Calzone
Gear Whore #1
- Local time
- 10:23 PM
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 16,953
- Location
- The Gateway To The Hudson Highlands
If the decision criteria is on image characteristics alone, I agree.
However, having moved to the M-P typ 240 after having the M9 for three years use, I find the other benefits of moving to the typ 240/246 series cameras to be compelling enough that I'd upgrade anyway, given the resources to do so. The improved responsiveness, quieter shutter, and more ergonomic controls alone make it for me, never mind the potential of Live View and optional EVF, or the other stuff. That's my personal opinion.
Of course, if I couldn't afford it, I'd keep going with what I had. 🙂
G
G,
The 2 GB buffer, the larger screen, and Live view to possibly use the camera as a scanner with a chrome 90 Macro Elmar I already own are further reasons. I actually like the extra weight of the M-240.
On one hand I still love my MM9, and if I could it would be great to own and use two monochrom M-bodies, but that might be a huge stretch.
A possible and sensible solution for both me and Leica is to offer a generous trade-in on my MM9 so I can upgrade. My sensor is still unspoiled and shows no hint of corrosion even though I am brassing through the anodize.
Perhaps this is why Leica didn't wait till the fall to release the M-246. In many ways good engineering is problem solving.
Cal