coelacanth
Ride, dive, shoot.
I need some advice. I am currently a 100% film shooter in all formats up to 8x10. For street I shoot Leica and TLR. I have decided to replace 135 film with digital or at least supplement it with digital because I am attracted to high ISO capabilities. The Monochrom is the only digital camera that has any interest to me. Now that the CCD version is being replaced I need to make a decision whether to jump now or wait for the new model to fall a bit in price. I have shot with Canon digital a decade ago and hated the plastic skin so decided to stick with film. Exactly how common is the CCD corrosion problem? I can get a mint CCD Monochrom for $3k less than the new camera. Since I have had very little interest in digital until this decision I have not been following the CCD issue so please forgive me for asking this question.
I don't think I can give you exact number/percentage of corrosion problem, but I was debating about jumping on to the original Monochrom vs M246, and went for the original MM for much lower price, and coming from shooting Tri-X regularly, I don't need any better high ISO performance than the original MM. I've had 5 or 6 M9 based digital M including original black chrome MM, 3 M8 variants in the past, and none of them had corrosion issue. I do live in pretty dry NorCal though.
Since Leica said that they'll replace the sensor with corrosion problem regardless of the age (and likely keep offering trade-in option as well), I figured I can live with the chance of corrosion happening and dealing with it when it happens.
Just my $0.02.
That said, I'm very much interested in what M246 can do, and will consider when the used market price becomes "reasonable" (read: $4K range).