Leica T "accidentally revealed"...

[Gabriel M.A.]

...on since-removed site. More interesting tidbits over on this site.

Let the bash...err...wild speculation begin...

 

[Rodchenko]

Looks usable.

 

[Black]

Meh.














.....

 

[Sparrow]

... is it under $1000?

 

[daveleo]

... is it under $1000?

Depends on how you define "under" .... 🙄

 

[YYV_146]

... is it under $1000?

$3k for the body, 4k for the kit allegedly.

I think I'll take two A7's for that money, and spend the change on beer 😀

 

[Keith]

........... 😱

 

[YYV_146]

Having gone through the specs, I don't see where this camera outperforms the already out of production Sony NEX-5N...Lenses are better, but there's only two.

Maybe Leica really is too rich for my blood 🙁

 

[rbelyell]

question really is accidentally revealed vs accidentally released.

 

[Keith]

I think the thing's ugly personally ... which is pretty big coming from someone who really likes the styling of the Sigma DPMs! 😛

 

[ruby.monkey]

That's a lovely Samsung.

 

[hepcat]

I'm sure they'll find a market for it. It won't be me, however.

 

[Highway 61]

........... 😱

Too bad I sold my yelllow Vespa long ago... 😛

 

[kbg32]

Looks like there will be a M - T mount adapter and "Visoflex".

 

[Bobfrance]

Looks like there will be a M - T mount adapter.

Or are they just making more 'M - T' promises? 😀

 

[jsrockit]

Too little too late for photographers... but probably will go over with fashion folks. Well, and those that are lucky enough to spend $4000 like I'd spend $200 (not judging either).

 

[Thardy]

... as expected.

 

[hipsterdufus]

I will not buy this camera. There is no way that this camera can be 6 times ($3000 vs. $500) better than my X-E1.

 

[B-9]

Ugly as sin, Ide be ashamed to admit that was a Leica.

 

[wilonstott]

Damnit. Why can't they make something cool?