Let's compare... Post your pictures. ONLY f1.2 and below!

Another shot on Efke 25. Again, F0.95 at 1/1000.

Farmer+Bob+0_95.jpg


Jim B.
 
The day in question was spent with an evil SLR sporting a 50mm f/1.2L Canon lens. I'm pretty sure these 3 were at 1.2. The middle photo is related to a strange sighting. There's a place in Ventura called Surfers Point. It's at Seaside Park. Exposed on the pebble beach were the remnants of ancient autos. I've visited that beach plenty of times but never saw these skeletons. They're like motor vehicle versions of finding bleached whale skeletons.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0631--700.jpg
    IMG_0631--700.jpg
    27.9 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_0602--700.jpg
    IMG_0602--700.jpg
    44.2 KB · Views: 0
  • Analysis of Classical Art.jpg
    Analysis of Classical Art.jpg
    34.8 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
wow. the zuiko oof seems like the utter cream. Im very interested in it but dont think I have another pair of hand for this system 🙁

heres some more from the 0.95 on canon 7 body:

3097714793_69cf0b88ba.jpg


3025236338_ca24155af6.jpg


2968430962_a6124086a6.jpg


3024229163_ace0e53650.jpg


sorry for the out-pour of bokeh but I think this is what this lens is for ;D

sensational photos !
 
Hello dovevadar, I usually use tri-x for 80% of my work....but a local camera store just got some xp-2 in and it is quite rare to find it in Bangkok, so I bought some....I tend to use tri-x more for work and for "serious photos" instead of just around my neighborhood.....but, I bought some xp-2 to try out with my new lens (35mm nokton 1.2)...thanks for the compliment....cheers, michael
 
Back
Top Bottom