zoom2zoom
Established
my second post on this forum.
I just acquired my M6 classic and 50 Noctilux which I enjoy quite a bit, but this is my only lens so far and I would like to try out other focal length lenses.
The issue is I am looking for afforable lenses that is compact, easy to carry around.
Thank you for your recommendations.
I am looking at 35mm, 75mm, 90mm lenses.
I just acquired my M6 classic and 50 Noctilux which I enjoy quite a bit, but this is my only lens so far and I would like to try out other focal length lenses.
The issue is I am looking for afforable lenses that is compact, easy to carry around.
Thank you for your recommendations.
I am looking at 35mm, 75mm, 90mm lenses.
back alley
IMAGES
the cv 35/2.5 and the 75/2.5 are small, light and incredibly sharp.
look no further.
joe
look no further.
joe
peter_n
Veteran
What Joe said. And for the 90mm, a Leitz "thin" Tele-Elmarit f2.8, also small, light and incredibly sharp but affordable (for a Leica) at around $500.
tajart
ancien
i'm always amazed by the compact size of the "fat" tele-elmarit 90. and then too, there is the 90 elmar-c. both are great performers, but then too, the standard 90 elmarit is great though not nearly as compact.
if you want a really compact 35 how about a summaron 3.5, or look for an elmar 35/3.5 thread mount and an m-adapter. that would be really compact.
and, i keep plugging the vc 28/3.5 for something a bit wider, and an amazing performer.
if you want a really compact 35 how about a summaron 3.5, or look for an elmar 35/3.5 thread mount and an m-adapter. that would be really compact.
and, i keep plugging the vc 28/3.5 for something a bit wider, and an amazing performer.
MCTuomey
Veteran
I third what Joe said. My 35/1.7 and 75/2.5 are simply wonderful. I bought the 75 mostly on the strength of Joe, Peter, and a couple other RFFers. They are so right. For the money, I don't think you can do better for new or nearly new lenses.
Speaking of the "thin" tele-elmarit 90/2.8, anyone want to sell me theirs?
Speaking of the "thin" tele-elmarit 90/2.8, anyone want to sell me theirs?
Chaser
Well-known
the voigtlander line has small cheap lenses. the 35/2.5 classic is $229 and the 75/2.5 Color-Heliar is $295. i guess it all depends on what constitutes affordable, but both the voightlander lenses have a great reputation and are affordable when compaired to leica optics.
Chaser
Well-known
wow i am a broken record...i should have refreshed this page before typing my response...
Jun Yan
Member
I vote for cv 35/2.5 PII, very compact, light weight.
I just orderd one from cameraquest.com
BTW, I am a new Leica M(M4-P) user aswell
I just orderd one from cameraquest.com
BTW, I am a new Leica M(M4-P) user aswell
zoom2zoom
Established
I just picked up the Leica 90 f2.8 tele-elmarit 'thin' version.
anyone knows where I can find a used cv 35/2.5 and the 75/2.5 ? or willing to sell them to me... although new is very well priced.
anyone knows where I can find a used cv 35/2.5 and the 75/2.5 ? or willing to sell them to me... although new is very well priced.
peter_n
Veteran
What are the first four digits in the serial nr?zoom2zoom said:I just picked up the Leica 90 f2.8 tele-elmarit 'thin' version.
zoom2zoom
Established
peter_n said:What are the first four digits in the serial nr?
2728xxx
Why, may I ask...
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
Serial numbers are relatively reliable sources to date the lens.
You may also consider the Konica lenses. They`re a bit more expensive, but in par with Leica quality. I speak from experience because I have one uncommon Hexanon 35/2.
Kobalux also offers LTM glass, easily converted to the M mount with an adapter ring.
Now... I'm mistified: you bought a Noctilux? Can I inquire as to why?
Thanks!
You may also consider the Konica lenses. They`re a bit more expensive, but in par with Leica quality. I speak from experience because I have one uncommon Hexanon 35/2.
Kobalux also offers LTM glass, easily converted to the M mount with an adapter ring.
Now... I'm mistified: you bought a Noctilux? Can I inquire as to why?
Thanks!
Jun Yan
Member
zoom2zoom said:anyone knows where I can find a used cv 35/2.5 and the 75/2.5 ? or willing to sell them to me... although new is very well priced.
Check the cameraquest.com
Terence T
Where'd my Bessa go?
I got a 1 month old CV 35 P II in like new condition going for $300 shipped (in US). Drop me an email if interested.
peter_n
Veteran
When you get it, shine a penlight-type flashlight through the front lens element and look through the back element for an almost fungus-like etching in the rear element. It will be immediately apparent to you. Less than 5% of the earlier TE's were afflicted with this problem which came to be known as "TE disease".zoom2zoom said:2728xxx
Why, may I ask...
There's a link to a recent PN thread on how to identify the problem below. Don't be alarmed by this, there is over a 95% probability that your new lens is fine - if it doesn't show the problem now it never will - but you should check all the same.
Enjoy your new TE, I love mine! The lens truly deserves its great reputation.
What does TE disease look like?
richard_l
Well-known
Tele-Elmarit 90mm f/2.8 (thin version)
Summaron 35mm f/2.8 or f/3.5 (preferably the M2 version)
I don't know how these Leitz lenses compare with CV, but I do know that they are excellent, and each can be had for under $500. Unless you like lenses with goggles, avoid the M3 version of the Summaron.
Summaron 35mm f/2.8 or f/3.5 (preferably the M2 version)
I don't know how these Leitz lenses compare with CV, but I do know that they are excellent, and each can be had for under $500. Unless you like lenses with goggles, avoid the M3 version of the Summaron.
zoom2zoom
Established
SolaresLarrave said:Now... I'm mistified: you bought a Noctilux? Can I inquire as to why?
Thanks!
Well, I have been so fascinated with 'super' fast primes, and love 50mm focal length.
I currently use Canon and Nikon DSLR bodies and have the Canon 50mm f1.0L and Nikon 58mm f1.2 Noct.
The reason for the Leica Noctilux is I wanted the three fastest primes available, to use this lens, I needed to get the M6 RF.
back alley
IMAGES
you don't really need a 75 if you have a 90. they are pretty close, step up or step back.
joe
joe
Graybeard
Longtime IIIf User
If you invest in a Leica Bayonet/Screw adaptor, you'll be able to use some quite low cost lenses.
You mightr consider the Russian Jupiter-12, 35mm f2.8 which is commonly available for under $40. The Jupiter-12 has been favorably compared with the 35mm Summaron.
Similarly, the 90mm f4 LTM Elmar or the 100mm Canon screw mount lenses are often to be found for under $100. Avoid the Russian Jupiter-9 85mm f2; this lens is for gamblers only.
You mightr consider the Russian Jupiter-12, 35mm f2.8 which is commonly available for under $40. The Jupiter-12 has been favorably compared with the 35mm Summaron.
Similarly, the 90mm f4 LTM Elmar or the 100mm Canon screw mount lenses are often to be found for under $100. Avoid the Russian Jupiter-9 85mm f2; this lens is for gamblers only.
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
Joe is right. A T-E voids your need for a 75mm. Hence, if you're in a budget, the ideal combo would be 35-50-90. Considering you went ahead and had dessert before your meal (by getting the Nocti right away), get a 35/2.5 pancake and you'll have the dream team ready.
Good luck and congratulations!
Good luck and congratulations!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.