These are the serial numbers I've dug up over a few months.
"C" means the lens is engraved with a red C indicating coated.
No C means the lens doesn't have the red C engraving (but still coated).
Production is certainly very low. Perhaps as low as 1,200 - 1,500 lenses.
Has anyone got any other serial numbers to add?
181272 - C
181283 - C
181311 - C
181344 - C
181347 - C
181478 - C
181509 - C
181572 - C
181581 - C
181586 - C
181614 - C
181624 - C
181711 - C
181755 - C
181759 - C
181787 - C
181798 - C
181833 - C
181939 - C
181942 - C
181983 - C
182058 - C
182070 - C
182101 - C
182119 - C
182158 - C
182252 - C
182272 - C
182302 - no C
182403 - no C
182448 - no C
182456 - no C
182472 - no C
182511 - no C
182528 - no C
182576 - no C
182602 - no C
182620 - no C
182633 - no C
182680 - no C
182797 - no C
182803 - no C
182816 - no C
"C" means the lens is engraved with a red C indicating coated.
No C means the lens doesn't have the red C engraving (but still coated).
Production is certainly very low. Perhaps as low as 1,200 - 1,500 lenses.
Has anyone got any other serial numbers to add?
181272 - C
181283 - C
181311 - C
181344 - C
181347 - C
181478 - C
181509 - C
181572 - C
181581 - C
181586 - C
181614 - C
181624 - C
181711 - C
181755 - C
181759 - C
181787 - C
181798 - C
181833 - C
181939 - C
181942 - C
181983 - C
182058 - C
182070 - C
182101 - C
182119 - C
182158 - C
182252 - C
182272 - C
182302 - no C
182403 - no C
182448 - no C
182456 - no C
182472 - no C
182511 - no C
182528 - no C
182576 - no C
182602 - no C
182620 - no C
182633 - no C
182680 - no C
182797 - no C
182803 - no C
182816 - no C
pyeh
Member of good standing
Nice work, Jon. I read somewhere, and I think you also pointed it out to me, that "no C" can still mean the lens is coated. Certainly my "no C" lens, which you've captured in your list, looks coated.
Pete, that's correct, lenses without the red C engraving are coated.
Nikon dropped the engraving because by 1956-7, about when the red C was dropped, all manufacturers were coating their lenses and there was no longer any need to advertise the fact.
Nikon dropped the engraving because by 1956-7, about when the red C was dropped, all manufacturers were coating their lenses and there was no longer any need to advertise the fact.
richardHaw
junk scavenger
Thanks! This is "maniac" information 


MikeL
Go Fish
Thanks! This is "maniac" information![]()
Funny you should say that.
Most folks don't know this, but when Jon was on the professional wrestling circuit he was known as Johnny The Maniac Manjiro. Not the biggest guy out there, but one of the craziest!
cqing
Member
181283 - 182158 with 'C'
182456 - 182797 without 'C'
Information retrieved from:
http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/serialno.html
182456 - 182797 without 'C'
Information retrieved from:
http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/serialno.html
Thanks! This is "maniac" information![]()
Funny you should say that.
Most folks don't know this, but when Jon was on the professional wrestling circuit he was known as Johnny The Maniac Manjiro. Not the biggest guy out there, but one of the craziest!
Mike, please don't divulge too much of my past here, or I may have to break out some incriminating photos of you taken in Shinjuku that night we found you semi conscious in an alley in Golden-gai with your pants around your ankles.
Come to think of it, I may have taken those photos with an S-mount W-Nikkor 3.5cm 1:1.8... bummer, different serial number range.
181283 - 182158 with 'C'
182456 - 182797 without 'C'
Information retrieved from:
http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/serialno.html
Thanks! 182158 was already in the list so added the other three serial numbers.
MikeL
Go Fish
Mike, please don't divulge too much of my past here, or I may have to break out some incriminating photos of you taken in Shinjuku that night we found you semi conscious in an alley in Golden-gai with your pants around your ankles.
Come to think of it, I may have taken those photos with an S-mount W-Nikkor 3.5cm 1:1.8... bummer, different serial number range.
Okay, I'll keep quiet! And regarding Golden-gai, Gabor was in way worse shape than I was from too much shōchū. At least I still had my pants.
On a less serious note, I have 182511 with no C and in feet.
Were all of them in feet?
pyeh
Member of good standing
MikeL, that Jon is a real dangerous character. He'll lead us all astray at the drop of a hat. I hear also that his one-inch punch can knock a person six feet.
On the question of feet and metre scales, I had a look at my little collection of Nikkor LTM lenses and they all have feet scales only, including my "C" and "no C" 35/1.8's. Just as well I can think in both units.
On the question of feet and metre scales, I had a look at my little collection of Nikkor LTM lenses and they all have feet scales only, including my "C" and "no C" 35/1.8's. Just as well I can think in both units.
Jon, always feat, but sometimes no sea.
DSC07526.jpg by robertjag, on Flickr
DSC07527.jpg by robertjag, on Flickr
DSC06135.jpg by robertjag, on Flickr
DSC06134.jpg by robertjag, on Flickr




Gabor was in way worse shape than I was from too much shōchū. At least I still had my pants.
Were all of them in feet?
Shōchū too? I remember the beer, whisky, and sake... but not the shōchū. Gotta watch that shōchū! Yes, at least you still had your pants.
I think all of them were in feet.
I hear also that his one-inch punch can knock a person six feet.
Pete, these lenses may use imperial units only, but in Japan we use the metric system. That would be a 2.54cm punch that can knock a person 182.88cm.
Jon, always feat, but sometimes no sea.
Thanks for the serial no's Robert. For a moment there I thought that was a Hurricane Irma joke
benmacphoto
Well-known
Hi Jon.
My 35mm f1.8 LTM Nikkor just came back from service at DAG.
SN: 181344 red C
My 35mm f1.8 LTM Nikkor just came back from service at DAG.
SN: 181344 red C
Thanks Ben!
James24
Well-known
Here's mine, Jon.

Calzone
Gear Whore #1
Jon,
SN182119- "C"
Cal
SN182119- "C"
Cal
Thatspec
Established
Funny you should say that.
Most folks don't know this, but when Jon was on the professional wrestling circuit he was known as Johnny The Maniac Manjiro. Not the biggest guy out there, but one of the craziest!
I'd always wondered what happened to his eyebrows, now we know...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNAqpv9ecM0
An LTM 3.5/1.8 has been near the top of my list for a long time
raid
Dad Photographer
I have to check my lens out for its SN. I will post it here then.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.