M5 vs M6 recommendation

I like the M5 match-needle metering, the viewfinder telling you what shutter speed you just dialled in. But I must say the M6 meter is pretty good. I spent a lot of time second guessing many exposures with a hand-held meter incident readings when I was also using an M2, and just matching those two little red triangles in the M6 viewfinder seems to work so well with almost any subject. Has to be so, or the M7 would be giving dud exposures for a good bit of many rolls.
 
One thing that hasn't been mentioned is the tendency of the M6 rangefinder patch to flare. This is especially true in lower light situations where there is a strong light source from the side, I've found. This is fixable, but be forewarned -- it can be quite annoying.

I had it happen one time. Turn the camera to vertical, focus, then back to horizontal.
 
One thing that hasn't been mentioned is the tendency of the M6 rangefinder patch to flare. This is especially true in lower light situations where there is a strong light source from the side, I've found. This is fixable, but be forewarned -- it can be quite annoying.

Indeed. Upgrading the finder optics to the MP version. Won't flare and will increase the value of your rig. DAG,YYe and Sherry will all do it for you, in addition to Leica themselves.
 
I can't imagine why every camera doesn't have an overhanging shutter speed dial.

Yup, this state of affairs is rather interesting. I recently went for the M7. I made a choice between that, the M6 TTL, and the M5.

Due to the small dial, the M6 classic and the MP were not on the table. In fact, I don't really understand why Leica went back to the small dial with their current film bodies. I suspect their marketing scheme may involve nostalgia. 🙂

I dont´t see myself coping with the small dial though. The overhanging one in M5 makes it a viable option for those who need functionality.
 
Anyone knows if there is someone who repairs M5’s in Europe ?

Kamera Service in the Netherlands does - I asked them, mine will be sent when I get my M2 back from them. I'm sure many others like Paepke do too.

Great camera, always my default choice if going out to shoot 35mm. Never liked my M6, which metering display you can get in a Nikon FM2n for a eighth of the cost...
 
Some things are simply going to come down to yourself as a user. What appeals to me or anyone else for that matter might not appeal to you. Also, only you know just how demanding you'll be of the camera. Just how much do you plan to use it and how hard do you tend to be on your gear?

While I own a Leica camera, I do not consider myself to be a Leicaphile (no one can pick apart a Leica camera like Leica owners, lol). The sorts of things that many Leica owners concern themselves with just don't matter to me. I purchased my M6 TTL new back in 2000 and have been very happy with it. I didn't choose the M6 TTL over any other Leica M models. I bought the M6 TTL because it happened to be the model that Leica was producing at the time I was ready to buy a new Leica camera. Had Leica been making the M5 at the time then that's likely what I would have ended up with. The funny thing is these days I wouldn't swap my M6 TTL for any other Leica M camera even if offered a straight up trade for any other model in new or like-new condition despite the issues that some have with it.

Some of this likely comes down to the fact that I had never owned a Leica M camera before the M6 TTL. For example, I've never found the viewfinder in the camera to be cluttered. The only time I even think about this is when reading the comments of others regarding cluttered viewfinders, lol. Also, the flare in the rangefinder patch is practically a non-issue for me. This isn't a problem all that often and when it does occur I simply shift the positioning of my eye in relationship to the eyepiece (it only takes a minuscule adjustment) to avoid the flare — this occurs at a subconscious level. I've also never found myself questioning whether or not any of my images were degraded by the inaccuracy of the framelines.

Some of it comes down to ergonomics. What I really happen to like about the M6 TTL in particular is the shutter speed dial — both the size and positioning of it, as well as the direction it turns as it relates to the metering system. As this control is involved with every single exposure that I make with the camera it's a big deal to me. I also really like the metering system display found in the M6 TTL. While others might not care for LED displays, I actually really like them. The functionality of the display incorporating the dot combined with the two arrows works perfectly for me. In addition, my needs as a user are modest in comparison to others. Perhaps that's why I've never had a problem with the camera? It will likely continue to serve me well without issue for the rest of my life.

With all that said, if I were tasked with adding another Leica M body to the mix then the M5 would be my choice even though I don't care as much for match needle metering systems as some do. As with the M6 TTL, the design of the shutter speed dial found on the M5 would be the primary reason for this choice. (Plus I happen to really dig the looks of the M5.) My guess is that you'll be very happy with the M5. Good luck!
 
I own both and love both, but I would go the M6 route if money allows. My experience bears out the above-mentioned issue of repairability between the cameras. Youxin Ye can do just about anything that needs doing on an M6 for a few hundred dollars and the turnaround time is typically a few weeks. On the other hand, the metering arm on my M5 broke and the camera had to go back to Leica Germany for repairs (turnaround time over 6 months). However, I bought the M5 from KEH and their warranty covered the cost of repairs + shipping, so the only real cost was time. I'll be honest though, if I'm shooting something serious, I reach for the M6 because, while I love my M5, I don't quite trust it.
 
Thank you all for the advices . In the end i think i will go with an M5 (134+) and buy a lens for the difference in price to the M6 .

As photography is a hobby for me and i only shoot 2 or 3 rolls per month on average i think an M5 is more than enough for me right now .
 
Good solution Luke.

I own both of them and photography is a hobby for me too, not a business.

I too think M5 is more than enough for your needs. Usually I grab the M6 more than the M5 and many times I've been tempted to sell the M5 but for one thing or another I end up not selling. Its handling is very different than the M6 IMHO, in a good way. My eyes prefer M5 viewfinder too.

M6 is smaller but M5 heftiness is quite a delight.

Wish you luck with it.

Marcelo
 
So many times in life it seems that when we fail to go with our gut instinct we end up regretting it. While it might not be the path that others would have chosen for themselves and their needs, I’m guessing that you’ll be rewarded many times over for staying true to yourself.
I'm leaning more towards the M5 as I like it a bit more

I wish you the best of luck with whichever M5 you end up selecting to become your own! It is a very cool and unique camera.
 
Well , things have happened since my last visit .

I was very close to buying an M5 but the seller backed out at the last minute . While searching for another M5 to buy , Christmas came and my wonderful wife said to start looking for an M6 as that would be my Christmas present .

Now i found a camera but there are some things i found odd and hopefully the Leica connoisseurs here can shed some light .

From my limited knowledge it seems to be an early model , the serial number seems to be 166XXXX , however what i find odd is the lack of "Made in Germany" on the back .

From other M6's around the same serial I saw they had the Made in Germany on the back .



 
Your right. Mine is a 167XXXX and has "Made in Germany" imprinted/embossed vertically in the leatherette to the right of the hinged door.

Perhaps your covering was changed although it appears to be original.

Of course, there are always variations in design/manufacturing especially early in the product's lifecycle. The "Leitz" red dot was normal for early M6's - later changed to a "Leica" red dot.

Also, the serial number coloring seems to have an orange tint and seems curious to me. Also curious are the strap eyelet bumpers in your photo (perhaps installed after purchase)? Perhaps the camera was sent in for service and the top plate was replaced? Interesting questions.

Some comparisons: https://cameraquest.com/m6dif.htm
 
I have yet to buy the camera , i'm waiting for some additional pictures and details about it.

An interesting fact , the seller is from Wetzlar .
 
... From my limited knowledge it seems to be an early model , the serial number seems to be 166XXXX , however what i find odd is the lack of "Made in Germany" on the back . ...
The only question I would ask is when a CLA was last performed. The leatherette has obviously been changed out - no big deal.

It's very clean - I would buy it without hesitation.
 
Back
Top Bottom