gurtch
Established
Can someone who has looked at or reviewed the M8, can you tell us what kind of battery it takes ( brand name and or specs)? I want to start searching 2nd party battery suppliers to see if there is an inexpensive equivalent. I can see having at least one extra charged back up, possibly two.
I have found with several cameras I have that the 2nd party batterys are not only cheaper, but at least as good (or better) than the OEM's.
Thanks
Dave
I have found with several cameras I have that the 2nd party batterys are not only cheaper, but at least as good (or better) than the OEM's.
Thanks
Dave
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
It is a camera-specific battery which communicates with the camera and has been designed for this camera only. There are no 3rd party replacements. The battery costs 80 Euro.
rvaubel
Well-known
gurtch said:Can someone who has looked at or reviewed the M8, can you tell us what kind of battery it takes ( brand name and or specs)? I want to start searching 2nd party battery suppliers to see if there is an inexpensive equivalent. I can see having at least one extra charged back up, possibly two.
I have found with several cameras I have that the 2nd party batterys are not only cheaper, but at least as good (or better) than the OEM's.
Thanks
Dave![]()
Jeesh, you want a $5000 camera body and your already are worring about saving a few bucks on a 2nd party battery? Some RD1 fans thought the same way and ended up with dead shutters. Why take a chance?
Rex
Mark Norton
Well-known
Hopefully, it's not made by Sony...
I expect there will be compatibles in due course, from the more reputable suppliers like Haehne. I think 80 euro is fair price for the Leica battery but for my R-D1, I went for compatible batteries at 1/5 of the price with no ill-effects at all.
I expect there will be compatibles in due course, from the more reputable suppliers like Haehne. I think 80 euro is fair price for the Leica battery but for my R-D1, I went for compatible batteries at 1/5 of the price with no ill-effects at all.
rvaubel
Well-known
Mark Norton said:Hopefully, it's not made by Sony...
I expect there will be compatibles in due course, from the more reputable suppliers like Haehne. I think 80 euro is fair price for the Leica battery but for my R-D1, I went for compatible batteries at 1/5 of the price with no ill-effects at all.
While I believe that 2nd party batteries where not the cause of the RD1's shutter problem (or anything else), the OEM batteries worked well and had a good capacity. The Epson batteries cost $50 (admittedly a rip-off) and Mark's batteries cost 1/5 of that.
There was something disconcerting about going on a $10,000 vacation last summer with a $10 2nd party battery backup, so I opted for the Epson
I guess you can call me extravagent
Rex
Bob Ross
Well-known
Rex, You'll enjoy Adorama's $109.95 for an extra M8 batteryrvaubel said:There was something disconcerting about going on a $10,000 vacation last summer with a $10 2nd party battery backup, so I opted for the Epson![]()
I guess you can call me extravagent
Rex
I'm still looking for the price on the diopter correction lenses. There is apparently a new series (Leica #14 38x vs. #14 35x), implying that the eye piece might be different or they just redesigned the diopters.
Bob
rvaubel
Well-known
Bob Ross said:Rex, You'll enjoy Adorama's $109.95 for an extra M8 battery![]()
Bob
Cheapskates
Where did you say you found those $10 batteries again?
Rex
J. Borger
Well-known
The M8 battery price is far from unusual ... the batterys for Canon 1 D/Ds cameras are about the same pricerange .. never heard anybody complain about that.
I can't see why anybody would take a risk with a 5000$ camera.
My Hahma 2nd part battery for the R-D1 showed all kind of unusual behaviour, including freezing camera. Only reason i ever bought it was the Epson batterys were hard to get ....... i only use originals now .... It's not worth the risk!
I can't see why anybody would take a risk with a 5000$ camera.
My Hahma 2nd part battery for the R-D1 showed all kind of unusual behaviour, including freezing camera. Only reason i ever bought it was the Epson batterys were hard to get ....... i only use originals now .... It's not worth the risk!
Mark Norton
Well-known
Bob
The new diopter correction lenses 14 38x are for the new "Universal" finder; the existing 14 35x lenses are the same as before for the camera. The diopter range is the same (+/- 3) but only in whole increments where the camera ones are available in half-diopter steps.
The new diopter correction lenses 14 38x are for the new "Universal" finder; the existing 14 35x lenses are the same as before for the camera. The diopter range is the same (+/- 3) but only in whole increments where the camera ones are available in half-diopter steps.
robbegibson
Newbie
Well, a spare rechargeable battery for the Hasselblad H2 is $243.00 -granted it is part of the hand grip, but stil.......
Robbe Gibson
Robbe Gibson
peterc
Heretic
Jon Perry
Established
Jeez,
... and people keep telling me I will save money if I go over to the dark side (digital)!
Jon
... and people keep telling me I will save money if I go over to the dark side (digital)!
Jon
Bob Ross
Well-known
Thanks Mark and that now makes sense.Mark Norton said:Bob
The new diopter correction lenses 14 38x are for the new "Universal" finder; the existing 14 35x lenses are the same as before for the camera. The diopter range is the same (+/- 3) but only in whole increments where the camera ones are available in half-diopter steps.
Bob
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.