M8--what kind of battery?

gurtch

Established
Local time
3:46 PM
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Messages
61
Can someone who has looked at or reviewed the M8, can you tell us what kind of battery it takes ( brand name and or specs)? I want to start searching 2nd party battery suppliers to see if there is an inexpensive equivalent. I can see having at least one extra charged back up, possibly two.
I have found with several cameras I have that the 2nd party batterys are not only cheaper, but at least as good (or better) than the OEM's.
Thanks
Dave :rolleyes:
 
It is a camera-specific battery which communicates with the camera and has been designed for this camera only. There are no 3rd party replacements. The battery costs 80 Euro.
 
gurtch said:
Can someone who has looked at or reviewed the M8, can you tell us what kind of battery it takes ( brand name and or specs)? I want to start searching 2nd party battery suppliers to see if there is an inexpensive equivalent. I can see having at least one extra charged back up, possibly two.
I have found with several cameras I have that the 2nd party batterys are not only cheaper, but at least as good (or better) than the OEM's.
Thanks
Dave :rolleyes:

Jeesh, you want a $5000 camera body and your already are worring about saving a few bucks on a 2nd party battery? Some RD1 fans thought the same way and ended up with dead shutters. Why take a chance?

Rex
 
Hopefully, it's not made by Sony...

I expect there will be compatibles in due course, from the more reputable suppliers like Haehne. I think 80 euro is fair price for the Leica battery but for my R-D1, I went for compatible batteries at 1/5 of the price with no ill-effects at all.
 
Mark Norton said:
Hopefully, it's not made by Sony...

I expect there will be compatibles in due course, from the more reputable suppliers like Haehne. I think 80 euro is fair price for the Leica battery but for my R-D1, I went for compatible batteries at 1/5 of the price with no ill-effects at all.

While I believe that 2nd party batteries where not the cause of the RD1's shutter problem (or anything else), the OEM batteries worked well and had a good capacity. The Epson batteries cost $50 (admittedly a rip-off) and Mark's batteries cost 1/5 of that.

There was something disconcerting about going on a $10,000 vacation last summer with a $10 2nd party battery backup, so I opted for the Epson:rolleyes:


I guess you can call me extravagent

Rex
 
rvaubel said:
There was something disconcerting about going on a $10,000 vacation last summer with a $10 2nd party battery backup, so I opted for the Epson:rolleyes:


I guess you can call me extravagent

Rex
Rex, You'll enjoy Adorama's $109.95 for an extra M8 battery:eek:
I'm still looking for the price on the diopter correction lenses. There is apparently a new series (Leica #14 38x vs. #14 35x), implying that the eye piece might be different or they just redesigned the diopters.
Bob
 
The M8 battery price is far from unusual ... the batterys for Canon 1 D/Ds cameras are about the same pricerange .. never heard anybody complain about that.
I can't see why anybody would take a risk with a 5000$ camera.
My Hahma 2nd part battery for the R-D1 showed all kind of unusual behaviour, including freezing camera. Only reason i ever bought it was the Epson batterys were hard to get ....... i only use originals now .... It's not worth the risk!
 
Bob

The new diopter correction lenses 14 38x are for the new "Universal" finder; the existing 14 35x lenses are the same as before for the camera. The diopter range is the same (+/- 3) but only in whole increments where the camera ones are available in half-diopter steps.
 
Well, a spare rechargeable battery for the Hasselblad H2 is $243.00 -granted it is part of the hand grip, but stil.......

Robbe Gibson
 
Mark Norton said:
Bob

The new diopter correction lenses 14 38x are for the new "Universal" finder; the existing 14 35x lenses are the same as before for the camera. The diopter range is the same (+/- 3) but only in whole increments where the camera ones are available in half-diopter steps.
Thanks Mark and that now makes sense.
Bob
 
Back
Top Bottom