rfaspen
[insert pithy phrase here]
What is true is that a 50mm on an M4/3 camera will capture an image with the same angle of view as a 100mm lens on an FF camera but with greater DOF than the latter (The DOF is not because it is mounted on a M4/3 camera but simply because its a 50mm lens not a 100mm lens).
Yes. This. ^^
But now I don't know if the super takumar can be adapted to M-mount (with RF coupling). It would be nice, and I know others on this forum have adapted various 50mm SLR lenses. For a while Amadeo was adapting Zeiss QBM lenses to M (and I have one of those too), but no longer.
The M42 super takumar 50/1.4 is a fairly small and ergonomic lens for an SLR lens. Even if an adaptation was permanent, I would still opt for it. The lens just doesn't get use now as an adapted m4/3 lens and I have many other lenses that are more interesting adapted to the m4/3 body. However, I seriously doubt I have more lenses to choose from than raid. That guy must have 1,000's of lenses in his closet 😀