willie_901
Veteran
Actually I find sensor technology so good across the board that the question which camera has the “best” is wholly academic and only significant for pixel geeks. Even the complaints about the corners performance of Leica lenses on Sony cameras have a high Princess on the Pea content IMO.
This was my basically my point.
I disagree that the differences are only significant for pixel peepers. Some people actually make use of higher analog signal-to-noise ratios and dynamic range. Some people enjoy the convenience of making raw files with iso-invariant cameras.
I would say the trade-off between using a Leica optical RF and enjoying a purposefully curated M/LTM lens collection vs. having the highest SNR and DR is no longer worth thinking about. This was not always the case. While I choose not to own Leica product (it's not the money, I can afford them), I admire how they have continually improved their sensor technologies.
Unless one relies heavily on cropping as a composition tool or shows extremely large prints in galleries, the MP count is also barely relevant.
I have no idea how SONY is not playing fair. I could be convinced otherwise. Are there facts that indicate SONY or others refuse to sell Leica sensor technology?