jszokoli
Well-known
You are correct, the 28mm are coupled - don't know where I got that notion!
The original 25mm was uncoupled...
Joe
You are correct, the 28mm are coupled - don't know where I got that notion!
sorry but the summaron is worse than the ultron? they are both gorgeous renderings but the summaron ltm is my dream
35 i have yet to find in good shape/decent price.
Flashlight and look from different angles?
The original 25mm was uncoupled...
Joe
Thanks, I tried it but I'm not experienced enough to make a proper evaluation! I guess it is the first version, I bought it as soon as it was imported in Italy. # is 9040479!
Long time I do not use it, maybe I should give a try! Thanks everybody!
Only the first version. The second ltm-version has a different focusing ring, so it is easy to tell them apart (the first version has a more "flat" scalloping). I have this lens for about twenty years and there is no haze whatsoever. Great lens.
Erik, this in my LTM Ultron, which version do you think it is? Serial is 9050xxx. I have used this lens a lot, it performs well, and the rear-most elements do not appear to be hazy. I have taken this lens to bits a couple of times to clean off dust from various travels.
well the 2.8 😉f/3.5 or f/2.8?
Erik.
It is a great lens, it is difficult to find a fast 35mm with LTM. This one is almost as good as the later M-version (wich has however a more solid feel).
Erik.
It is a great lens, it is difficult to find a fast 35mm with LTM. This one is almost as good as the later M-version (wich has however a more solid feel).
Erik.
The Canon 35/1.5 is ltm, Erik.
I know, Raid, but the lens is very hard to get and out of my budget!
Erik.
The problem is that at this point, one would get such a lens for "character" only, since the new ones literally obliterate them in terms of performance, and paying even more than the modern ones for character is not always justifiable.