While the mininum number of cameras one should own is three...
Now you've got me reciting the usage instructions for the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch...
"Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three...."
rhl-oregon
Cameras Guitars Wonders
A camera for every year of anniversaries seems rational.
I'm coming up on 33 of the latter, so there's room to increase the former. Not much. but still....
I'm coming up on 33 of the latter, so there's room to increase the former. Not much. but still....
John Bragg
Well-known
Surely N=infinity ? in theory anyway ? The practical limit being the ammount of space available for their storage though.
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
I think the answer lies in the "Hitchhikers Guide" - the number is 42.
Minimum is not significant - but using 42 as an arbitrary number works for me - though I haven't counted them for a while - and they tend to multiply quietly.
Minimum is not significant - but using 42 as an arbitrary number works for me - though I haven't counted them for a while - and they tend to multiply quietly.
dave lackey
Veteran
While the mininum number of cameras one should own is three, the correct number is n+1, where "n" is the number of cameras currently owned. This equation may also be re-written as s-1, where "s" is the number of cameras owned that would result in your wife filing for divorce.
That is funny! One wonders how many would be the minimum if both spouses are photographers, though.
zuiko85
Veteran
I have about forty. From toy plastic cameras to toy plastic DSLR's (snide comment about digital). Only actually use two or three on regular basis.
Format range runs from 10X14mm Minolta 16II to 4X5 kit built view caamera.
PS; I become enamored for weeks with one camera, then switch to another for the next few weeks.
Format range runs from 10X14mm Minolta 16II to 4X5 kit built view caamera.
PS; I become enamored for weeks with one camera, then switch to another for the next few weeks.
Peter_wrote:
Well-known
who cares about the minimum. trying to reach the maximum...
As many as makes you happy. Right now for me, that is 4 cameras. I could cut it to one, but it wouldn't be as fun.
David Hughes
David Hughes
That is funny! One wonders how many would be the minimum if both spouses are photographers, though.![]()
And what's the number of spouses to have?
Regards, David
paulfish4570
Veteran
one ..............
Mongo Park
Established
Would you sell your wife for 40 camels or for 40 cameras you really really want? You needn't want them all in one go.
raytoei@gmail.com
Veteran
interesting thread... i have standardized on Polypan f 50 for slow film and Kentmere 400@800 for fast film. i try to use a different camera every day. so many affordable cameras now available and so little time...
redisburning
Well-known
one that works.
Tom Harrell
Well-known
What, there is a minimum? Why didn't someone tell me? I wouldn't have bought all of these cameras!
Tom
Tom
jwicaksana
Jakarta, Indonesia
Cameras to own would be ~ infinite depending on time, $$, space, etc, but number of cameras to use would be 3 for me..
thegman
Veteran
I'd say 2, even as an amateur. Had I gone on holiday a couple of years ago with just one of my cameras, I'd have come back with a load of unexposed film, because it broke. Since then, I've always had at least 1 backup, and really, more than 1.
bobkonos
Well-known
"While the mininum number of cameras one should own is three..."
Says who?
Says who?
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
I contend that the minimum cameras to own is equal to the number of cameras owned.
David Hughes
David Hughes
I contend that the minimum cameras to own is equal to the number of cameras owned.
+1 on that (total)...
Regards, David
porktaco
Well-known
the correct answer is "all"
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.