finguanzo
Well-known
I guess it depends on the number of bags you own....
Each bag hold at least 2 bodies..
Then there is the option of buying another bag..
Each bag hold at least 2 bodies..
Then there is the option of buying another bag..
Pioneer
Veteran
Three?
Like...
- 35mm
- MF
- LF?
Or:
- RF
- SLR
- TLR?
Or:
- Japanese
- German
- um, okay, oh yeah - Swedish
Or:
- film
- digital
- video
Actually that should be "And" not "Or". It comes to 162. I think I may be getting close!
raid
Dad Photographer
I refer you all to the thread on Ex wife and Ex girlfriend.
Posting there may be related to exceeding the limit s.
Posting there may be related to exceeding the limit s.
Phil_F_NM
Camera hacker
i
It's one of my favorite numbers and goes perfectly in this thread because the photograph is in the mind, not the gear.
Phil Forrest
It's one of my favorite numbers and goes perfectly in this thread because the photograph is in the mind, not the gear.
Phil Forrest
Addy101
Well-known
Forty two is the answer to everything. Don't forget to bring your towel thoughthe number is 42.
The minimum number of cameras to own is zero, as long as you have enough cameras you can use :angel:
Al Patterson
Ferroequinologist
the correct answer is "all"
I'd make that all*2, as you might need a backup body, and you can never predict which of all your cameras will fail just when you want it...
Dirk
Privatier
In my case, the answer is apparently 19.
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
Mininum Number of Cameras to Own
... is proportional to the amount of curiosity to be satisfied.
... is proportional to the amount of curiosity to be satisfied.
abo_1970
Member
2... One film and one digital...
But for future storage i think negatives are still better than digital... the chance that my house burns down is still alot smaller than the chance my harddisk crashes or my data gets corrupted after x transfers to another system... so curious to see if someone can come up with a device where one can transfer his digital image to a negative...
But for future storage i think negatives are still better than digital... the chance that my house burns down is still alot smaller than the chance my harddisk crashes or my data gets corrupted after x transfers to another system... so curious to see if someone can come up with a device where one can transfer his digital image to a negative...
Godfrey
somewhat colored
the minimum and the maximum number of cameras to own are the same number: whatever it takes for you to do the photography you want to do.
G
G
chris00nj
Young Luddite
I hope people realize that this is a joke/funny/satire aimed at many of our incessant need to buy new cameras and lenses.
Some people seemed to take it way too seriously.
Some people seemed to take it way too seriously.
There is an old guitar player joke that is appropriate here: Q: "How many guitars does a guitar player need?" A: "Just one more."
David Hughes
David Hughes
And how many back-ups do we need...
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.