rjjackson
Newbie
i can't seem to find a straight answer: will the 50/2 collapsing summicron safely collapse inside a CLE?
Beemermark
Veteran
Do you have a CLE now? Do you see a metering arm inside the body that a collapsed lens would hit? No, you don't see an arm? Then why the heck do you think a collapsible lens would harm the metering arm?
Why do people keep asking this over and over? Are you a climate change scientist?
Why do people keep asking this over and over? Are you a climate change scientist?
Paul T.
Veteran
And welcome to the forum, RJ!
(I too think your collapsible will be fine on the CLE)
(I too think your collapsible will be fine on the CLE)
rjjackson
Newbie
beemermark: let's see -- i think i can answer your questions: no; no; no; no; no; no. does it follow then that the answer to my question, also, is "no"?
you forgot to ask if i actually like the weather. for that, i can say "yes".
ok but in fact i didn't see any references to the collapsing summicron actually collapsed either on this site or elsewhere. please point me to the reference, if you don't mind.
paul: thanks! lovely place.
ok but in fact i didn't see any references to the collapsing summicron actually collapsed either on this site or elsewhere. please point me to the reference, if you don't mind.
paul: thanks! lovely place.
Palaeoboy
Joel Matherson
Beemermark Where does the OP mention anything about hitting a meter arm?
Graham Line
Well-known
Long long ago, when I had both a CLE and a collapsible Summicron, I put the shutter on B and carefully collapsed the lens while watching through the opening.
IIRC, and I could well be wrong, the clearance was so tight that I had no confidence in doing it in actual practice. I know I never used that lens on that camera and eventually sold the collapsible. The metering cells are at the bottom of the shutter space and I had no interest in screwing those up.
Beemermark is unable to distinguish between CL and CLE. It's like the difference between an R75 and a K75, sort of.
IIRC, and I could well be wrong, the clearance was so tight that I had no confidence in doing it in actual practice. I know I never used that lens on that camera and eventually sold the collapsible. The metering cells are at the bottom of the shutter space and I had no interest in screwing those up.
Beemermark is unable to distinguish between CL and CLE. It's like the difference between an R75 and a K75, sort of.
HuubL
hunter-gatherer
Dear Mr. Jackson,
Welcome to RFF. Don't be fooled by an initial impression that this might not be a very pleasant place to visit and enjoy the enthusiasm, knowledge and help of fellow photographers and collectors of fine cameras!
Please visit again!
Welcome to RFF. Don't be fooled by an initial impression that this might not be a very pleasant place to visit and enjoy the enthusiasm, knowledge and help of fellow photographers and collectors of fine cameras!
Please visit again!
George S.
How many is enough?
Mark,
Try the Decaf tomorrow morning!
Try the Decaf tomorrow morning!
robklurfield
eclipse
don't do it.
use some dymo-type label tape to prevent the lens from fully retracting, unless of course you'd like that CLE to become a meterless RF.
use some dymo-type label tape to prevent the lens from fully retracting, unless of course you'd like that CLE to become a meterless RF.
George S.
How many is enough?
Do they even make Dymo label tape anymore?
Fenwick
Established
Do you have a CLE now? Do you see a metering arm inside the body that a collapsed lens would hit? No, you don't see an arm? Then why the heck do you think a collapsible lens would harm the metering arm?
Why do people keep asking this over and over? Are you a climate change scientist?
Is this guy here just to tick people off
And what a great impression he makes on new members
rjjackson
Newbie
so the tally:
2 yes (by fiat)
1 maybe (with mod)
1 no (too close)
well, i'm a risk taker and ordered a CLE so i will soon see what happens. i don't really see how the barrel can damage the light meter bits since they seem to be embedded below the chamber where the lens barrel collapses. am i missing something from photographs?
2 yes (by fiat)
1 maybe (with mod)
1 no (too close)
well, i'm a risk taker and ordered a CLE so i will soon see what happens. i don't really see how the barrel can damage the light meter bits since they seem to be embedded below the chamber where the lens barrel collapses. am i missing something from photographs?
Graham Line
Well-known
so the tally:
am i missing something from photographs?
Nope. You got the $5 tour and then some. Let us know how it works for you.
For me, a collapsible was too fiddly and not the way to go.
MP/CLE
Established
...but the CLE and rokkor 40 are so small anyway...
rjjackson
Newbie
brief update: it fits, just. joe described it correctly. the clearance is extremely tight and if the lens barrel is loose when collapsed, it might bump against the baffle that protects the light meter. i can't see how it would touch the meter optics, though, unless something fell off the lens barrel.
the cle is a nice little camera. MP/CLE -- you're right, the 40mm is small indeed and i figure if the cle works for me i'll pick up a 40mm down the road.
thanks all,
rj
the cle is a nice little camera. MP/CLE -- you're right, the 40mm is small indeed and i figure if the cle works for me i'll pick up a 40mm down the road.
thanks all,
rj
Graham Line
Well-known
The CLE with the 28, 40 and 90 makes a nice versatile kit for anything but closeup work. Adding finders etc just drifts away from the designers' intent. I'm sure you'll like working with it.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.