Minolta SRT's -- Gotta Love 'Em.

mynikonf2 said:
You do not have to spend huge amounts of money trying to acquire the latest & greatest gear in-order to impress or express. 😀
Click to expand...

This statement by mynikonf2 sums up one of the main reasons why I am enjoying my Minolta system so much.





Here is yesterday's email from John Titterton: http://www.geocities.com/~titterington/camera-repair/


Dan,

I have looked at the lenses and this is what I have found:

28mm F2.5 Minolta MC W Rokkor-SI (has sticky blades) $35

35mm F1.8 Minolta MC W Rokkor-HH (has sticky blades) $40

35mm F2.8 MC W Rokkor-X HG (has sticky blades) $30

(2) 50mm F1.4 MC Rokkor-PF (both need CLA) $30 each

85mm F1.7 MC Rokkor-PF (has sticky blades) $40

100mm F2.5 MC Tele-Rokkor-PF (needs CLA) $30

Return postage via Priority insured mail $22

Please let me know what you think.

John



Makes sense to me to fix everything that needs work in one big shipment. Prices are great IMO and worth every penny. 😀😀
 
Here is my favorite SRT-101, with the Minolta +2 Eyepiece Corrector "clipped" into the back(It's the rectangular ocular surrounded by the rubber eyecup). Went out with this rig today, with the 200mm F3.5 MC Rokkor, and am liking how it all works out. Works great with my eyeglasses, there is no viewfinder cutoff and focusing is super-sharp. BTW I think these eyepieces fit almost all Minolta SLR and Digital cameras. 😎

Just found another +2 Corrector on Amazon, but if anybody here knows where I can find some more, please let me know. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 001.jpg
    001.jpg
    35.3 KB · Views: 0
In addition to collecting SRT-era bodies and lenses/accessories, I am also interested in collecting literature that relates to Minolta SRT.

Here is an article by Lief Ericksenn, on the Minolta 400mm F5.6 Apo-Tele Rokkor-X, with matching 2x Apo-Teleconverter (which I just bought recently). Lief really likes the lens, surprisingly it cost over $1500 back in 1977. I also learned something new about this lens; the flourite elements expand and contract at different temperatures, which explains why the lens has the ability to focus slightly-beyond infinity. This article is from the April 1977 edition of CAMERA35 magazine:

My 2x Apo-Converter is now at Greg Stelz's spa, he is replacing the springs in the front mount, to tighten the whole thing up.
 

Attachments

  • 400APO2.jpg
    400APO2.jpg
    69.4 KB · Views: 0
  • 400APO1.jpg
    400APO1.jpg
    67.1 KB · Views: 0
Nokton48 said:
This statement by mynikonf2 sums up one of the main reasons why I am enjoying my Minolta system so much.

Here is yesterday's email from John Titterton: http://www.geocities.com/~titterington/camera-repair/

Dan,

I have looked at the lenses and this is what I have found:

28mm F2.5 Minolta MC W Rokkor-SI (has sticky blades) $35

35mm F1.8 Minolta MC W Rokkor-HH (has sticky blades) $40

35mm F2.8 MC W Rokkor-X HG (has sticky blades) $30

(2) 50mm F1.4 MC Rokkor-PF (both need CLA) $30 each

85mm F1.7 MC Rokkor-PF (has sticky blades) $40

100mm F2.5 MC Tele-Rokkor-PF (needs CLA) $30

Return postage via Priority insured mail $22

Please let me know what you think.

John

Makes sense to me to fix everything that needs work in one big shipment. Prices are great IMO and worth every penny. 😀😀
Click to expand...

Did your lenses come back from Mr. Titterington yet? How are they?

Best,

Tom
 
Tom33 said:
Did your lenses come back from Mr. Titterington yet? How are they?

Best,

Tom
Click to expand...

Hi Tom,
There was a delay, I responded to John's email, but he didn't get it. But I'm not in a hurry, so all is well. He is working on them right now.

Greg Stelz is finishing up two more SRT101 bodies for me, as well as a 58mm F1.2 MC and my Apochromatic 2X Teleconverter. And Essex is just finishing up my XK and two Auto Exposure Prisms.

Repairs can sometimes take a bit. Will report back when all is received.
 
kyonthinh said:
Nokton, can I ask you about one thing?
I have Myopia -1,75. Should I buy eyepiece No 3,4 or No 7?
Click to expand...

I am honestly not sure, you might want to ask your optician, or whomever supplies your eyeglasses? Minolta, in the original instructions, says to try two, one at recommended strength, then add another enough to go up to the next strength. In other words, I tried a +2, then used the +1 to look through both at the same time, making the equivilent of a +3. These test should be done with the lens focused at infinity. In my case, I settled on the +2. Hope that helps.

No 6 is -1, No 7 is -2, and No 8 is -3.
 
Tom33 said:
Did your lenses come back from Mr. Titterington yet? How are they? Best, Tom
Click to expand...

Hey Tom,
The lenses are back from Mr. Titterton. I just looked them all over, helicals are smooth, diaphrams are very snappy, no oil on blades, all looking good through the camera, and they look as clean as they can possibly be. He had them ready in 24 hours after telling me he was starting on them, and even ran them to the post office that same evening, after emailing me that they were done. I am totally delighted and he will be getting more business in the future from me. Here are the lenses, everything back together, and now ready to use:
 

Attachments

  • 002.jpg
    002.jpg
    79.8 KB · Views: 0
Nice!

Nice!

The lens collection looks great. The X700 I bought from him is like new, and I am convinced he is a great resource. I am boxing up some lenses and bodies to send to John this week. I have an X-500, SRT-202, XE-7 and XD-11 that need CLAs, as well as a MD Rokkor 50/f1.2 and an AF 50/1.7 that needs CLA.

It is a black XD-11, and it will be getting a brown Crocodile recover (Aki-Asahi sourced) while it is in the shop. I hope to get it all in the mail tomorrow.

You have mentioned another Minolta camera repair source you use. How is that working out? Can you share particulars?

Best,

Tom
 
I met Greg Stelz on Flikr, he posts on the Minolta Forums, under the handle MOUNTAIN DAWG. I just talk to him through Flikr. He's in Durango Colorado, and he did an A1++ job on the first SRT101 body I sent him. Now he has two more of mine, but I think they are on their way back to me, at this point. http://www.flickr.com/photos/gstelz/7941601772/in/contacts/

Essex Camera Repair is fixing my XK and two Auto Prisms, I was not able to find another source for repairing it. They are a big busy shop, and they used to do all of my Canon RF lenses and bodies. They can fix about anything. The XK should be ready to ship about now, too. I called last week and they said it was "almost done". http://www.essexcamera.com/
 
All Repairs Are Now Back.

All Repairs Are Now Back.

Now I have three freshly overhauled SRT101's (by Greg Stelz), and all meters agree on high and low light levels! Nothing like having good reliable equipment. And my XK and Prism are back from Essex (the meter was way off) but now, it agrees with the other three SRT cameras, at least on high light levels. More testing will be required to determine the quirks.

Quite alot of photo firepower for not too much money 😎
 

Attachments

  • 001.jpg
    001.jpg
    68.7 KB · Views: 0
Really nice collection of cameras in the photo. Do you find the soft releases provide a large improvement in the shutter control on the Minolta SRT and XK bodies? I was considering purchasing one for my SRT 202. What make do you use?

Best,

Tom
 
Tom33 said:
Really nice collection of cameras in the photo. Do you find the soft releases provide a large improvement in the shutter control on the Minolta SRT and XK bodies? I was considering purchasing one for my SRT 202. What make do you use?

Best,

Tom
Click to expand...

Tom,
I like the way the SRT handles with the Abrahamsson Softie, TomA posts here at RFF quite a bit. I used to use these these with my Leicas, and yes, they improve the handling and steadiness IMO. The black nylon hairtie is my own invention, it prevents misfires and wasted frames.:bang:

http://www.rapidwinder.com/ to order. Get the Classic one, not the Mini.
 
Hmm strange, I bought a diopter number 4, but it seem i bought a wrong thing. I cant see clearly. But more strange is, when I look without glass normally, it is not as clear as when I look in the viewfinder without glass. I think the camera is already -1 or +1. I'm not sure.
 
Does the diopter have "4" stamped on it, and not some other number? Reason I asked, is that I bought some, with boxes properly marked, that had the wrong diopters inside :bang: Seems people -do- mix them up.

If you would like to sell your #4, I would be very happy to buy it. Send me a PM if you are interested.
 
kyonthinh said:
Ok I know why, maybe it's real +2, but as I research, +2 is for far sighted, and I must use -1 because I have near sighted. Do you have far sighted Nokton?
Click to expand...

Yes I am basically near sighted, because I cannot see well at distances, without thick eyeglasses. But, as I eyes are getting older, I now have "bifocal" lenses, for closeup viewing, such as reading, seeing computer screen viewing, etc. So as I age I will need stronger and stronger "reading" eyeglass corrections. On the plus side, with my new eyeglasses, I have excellent 20/20 vision at all distances.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom