roscoetuff
Well-known
Unfortunately, we don't have the ability here (to my knowledge) to do compound polls the way I'd like to separate 35mm and 120 rolls film. In part, there seems to be a difference by film type that gets confusing when folks don't specify, and I'm also curious to see if there are any legs to the Pyro and Pyrocat "buzz" vs. "reality" question some bring up. I'm also curious about "Standard", "High Dilution/Low Agitation", "Semi-Stand" and "Stand" choices... but we can't add all of these possibilities into one poll. So maybe in series? if there's a stomach for it? I'd also be curious how many here roll their own chemistry versus mix it up from a commercial or semi-commercial kit (some suggest Photo Formulary isn't really a commercial company... and I get that).
Pioneer
Veteran
Beutler or D23
Beutler or D23
I use Beutler or D23 most of the time, both of which are mixed up when needed. Always having fresh developer available is nice.
Beutler or D23
I use Beutler or D23 most of the time, both of which are mixed up when needed. Always having fresh developer available is nice.
sepiareverb
genius and moron
I've gotten pretty set in my ways with developers. HC-110 for some films, Rodinal or Studionol for others. And then a few specialized developers for a few films.
John Bragg
Well-known
Always HC-110 dilution H. (Minimal agitation)
Jake Mongey
Well-known
Usually use rodinol although its fallen out of favor with me with a recent change of aesthetic and its moving in favour of ID11 microphen and percepetol but rodinol is outlasting them as i shoot so much I just find myself running out of the others very quickly.
phrons
Established
I like the contrast of rodinal.
roscoetuff
Well-known
Hey Dan: Which Beutler are you using (I think there's Red and Blue)? Shots I've seen with D-23 seem to show really well.
FWIW, I'm using HC-110 as my main squeeze. I like the flexibility to use it in any number of ways. Not my favorite results, but very dependable. I've liked the results of FP4+ with Pyrocat-HD, but I like them with HC-110, too. Looking forward to trying some Rodinal with 120 where I hear the grain issues ...are negated by the negative's size.
FWIW, I'm using HC-110 as my main squeeze. I like the flexibility to use it in any number of ways. Not my favorite results, but very dependable. I've liked the results of FP4+ with Pyrocat-HD, but I like them with HC-110, too. Looking forward to trying some Rodinal with 120 where I hear the grain issues ...are negated by the negative's size.
johnf04
Well-known
I use Agfa Rodinal - I recently bought 2 unopened 500ml bottles, and I have half bottle I bought when Agfa went under. There should be enough there to see me out.
kiemchacsu
Well-known
HC-110 is so easy to use, cheap and shelf life is forever.
T-max is also a cool developer, especially for pushing. The only downsize is cost.
Verdict: HC-110 is king.
T-max is also a cool developer, especially for pushing. The only downsize is cost.
Verdict: HC-110 is king.
ellisson
Well-known
Usually DDX, sometimes D76, occasionally Perceptol.
kxl
Social Documentary
Historically, I would think that D-76 would be one of, if not the most commonly used B&W developer of all time. Back in the day, that was usually what was available in my high school darkroom, as well as public darkrooms.
It probably continues to be one of the most commonly-used developers to this day, along with HC-110 and Xtol -- all very good all around developers.
It probably continues to be one of the most commonly-used developers to this day, along with HC-110 and Xtol -- all very good all around developers.
sreed2006
Well-known
I am no expert, but for low speed films (below 100 ISO), I really like the results produced by Caffenol. For the last few dozen rolls of Tri-X, I've been using Rodinal. The results are not spectacular, but it's easy to mix up and use.
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
D-76; XTOL; and Other, specifically DD-X or Microphen.
anerjee
Well-known
I only shoot tri-x, usually at 250 (for daylight) or 640 (for indoors), and use Rodinal and Microphen respectively
sazerac
Well-known
I've gone through a couple phases over the years. Currently I have a bottle of TMax developer for Tri-X 35mm. I had been on an XTOL kick for a while because I could also use it for the TMax 100 4x5 film. I've also developed a lot with the different dilutions of HC-110. If I had to pick I might say that XTOL has my favorite look.
Last edited:
Chris101
summicronia
I use HC110, dilution b at 20C for almost every roll of black and white film I shoot, which is on average one roll a week. Occasionally, in the summer, the temperature is too high, and I use a nomograph to determine the equivalent time. I use time to control contrast coupled with the effective film speed.
I also clicked some other choices: For delta 100, I use D76. I have also experimented with caffeinol, and some speed increasing developer in a little tin can, back in the 1970s. These days it's always the hc110 though, mostly because pushing and pulling is linear.
I also clicked some other choices: For delta 100, I use D76. I have also experimented with caffeinol, and some speed increasing developer in a little tin can, back in the 1970s. These days it's always the hc110 though, mostly because pushing and pulling is linear.
Jockos
Well-known
Right now were switching from XTOL (W27) to FX-39 for a while, to see which we like better.
For large format, I use HC-110 for economy
For large format, I use HC-110 for economy
zuiko85
Veteran
For those of us who don't develop film regularly HC-110 has the keeping quality I need.
Bill Clark
Veteran
The developer I use varies.
Today I'm developing a 36 exp. roll of Pan F Plus in Adox (APH-09) similar to Rodinal.
Today I'm developing a 36 exp. roll of Pan F Plus in Adox (APH-09) similar to Rodinal.
Juan Valdenebro
Truth is beauty
Rodinal & Microphen... Sharp grain or nothing!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.