Most elegant rangefinder 35s of the ‘50’s? The Topcon 35-S & 35-L! No interchangeable lenses, but their form factor & performance are A+

Most elegant rangefinder 35s of the ‘50’s? The Topcon 35-S & 35-L.!
No interchangeable lenses, but their form factor & performance are A+

By Jason Schneider

Tokyo Optical Co., Ltd., historically known as Tōkyō Kōgaku Kikai K.K., is a major Japanese precision equipment manufacturer that today operates as the Topcon Corporation. Founded in 1932, the company earned its reputation as a premier supplier of optics for the Imperial Japanese Army (mirroring Nikon’s role for the Imperial Japanese Navy). In the postwar era, Topcon revolutionized the photography market by introducing such landmark cameras as the 1963 Topcon RE Super (marketed in slightly revised form as the Beseler Topcon Super D in the USA), the first 35mm SLR with built-in through-the-lens (TTL), full-aperture metering. The "Topcon" name was derived from Top Company of Nippon, or Tokyo Optical Co., and the company began making cameras for the international market in 1953. Ironically, the rugged Topcon RE Super bodies, valued for their durability, were adopted by the U.S. Navy in the 1960s, turning the company’s military legacy on its head! Faced with intense competition, Tokyo Optical ceased 35mm camera production in 1980 to focus on specialized industrial and optics, which it still manufactures under the Topcon Corporation brand.

Another view of my Topcon 35-L, one of the most elegantly understated rangefinder 35s in my c...jpeg
Front view of my Topcon 35-L. I think it's one of the most elegantly understated rangefinder 35s ever, but you're free to disagree.

The Topcon 35-S was released in 1956 and manufactured for only about a year. It features a specially designed Topcor 44mm f/2semi-wide angle and a Seikosha-MX inter-lens leaf shutter with speeds from 1 to 1/500 sec plus B. The lens is a superb Double-Gauss type with 6 elements in 4 groups (1-2-2-1), the same design as the highly regarded 50mm f/2 Topcor-S, and it has a 10-bladed diaphragm for smooth bokeh. The 35-S has an accessory shoe on the top cover and an MX sync terminal on the side of the lens housing. The viewfinder is a reflected Albada-frameline type with automatic parallax compensation over the entire focusing range down to 2.7 feet, and a 1:1 (life-size) magnification. Like the original Leica M3 of 1954, the Topcon’s lever advance mechanism is double stroke, claimed by Topcon to prevent the tearing of sprocket holes in film. At the time of its introduction the Topcon 35-S was priced at $109 in the U.S.A, equal to $1,298 in 2026 dollars!

My very own Topcom 35-L., a great high performance ramgefinder 35!..jpeg
My very own Topcon 35-L., a great high performance rangefinder 35 with a super 4.4cm f/2 Topcor lens and much more !

The Topcon 35-L (Beseler Topcon-L in North America) replaced the 35-S in 1957. Its specifications are the same as the 35-S; however, it was “upgraded” with a Seikosha-MXL leaf shutter that features the "new" LV (light-value) system that vintage camera shooters (including me) love to hate. Fortunately, it’s easy to bypass the dreaded LV scale (which was used in conjunction with a shoe-mounted selenium meter) by using the front-mounted mounted f/2 to f/16 aperture ring and the shutter speed ring atop the lens barrel. The bad news: The aperture diaphragm in the 35-L has only 5 blades, half as many as in the 35-S. True, you’re unlikely to notice much difference in terms of bokeh between the two models, but as an otherwise happy 35-L owner, it still annoys me. T e Topcon 35-L was sold together with a selenium light meter giving readings in LVs and was priced at about 10% more than the 35-S.

Lens diagram of 4.4cm f:2 Tipcor lens, a superb 6-element, 4-group Double Gauss type.jpeg
Lens diagram of 4.4cm f/2 Topcor lens, a superb 6-element, 4-group Double Gauss type based on the acclaimed 50mmm f/2 Topcor-S.

There was a third model in the Topcon 35 series. The Topcon 35-JL was released almost simultaneously with the 35-L. It is identical to its sister model, but it’s equipped with a 44mm f/2.8 Topcor and was slightly less expensive. The lens is a Heliar type with 5 elements in 3 groups (2-1-2), the same design as the one used in the 50mm f/2.8 Topcor. The 35-JL was phased out in late 1959 along with the 35-L, marking the end of the short but memorable 35mm rangefinder era at Topcon.

Lens controls illustration from Topcon 35-L manual, Note LV scale highlighted in yellow. Fort...jpeg
Lens controls from Topcon 35-L manual, Note LV scale highlighted in yellow. Yes, it's easy to set f/stops and shutter speeds separately.

Hands-on with my Topcon 35-L

I seldom wax poetic about the form factor of cameras. However, compared to other noninterchangeable-lens rangefinder 35s of the ‘50s and ‘60s, the Topcon 35-L (and its nearly identical predecessor, the 35-S) are drop dead gorgeous—minimalist masterpieces of understated style. Weighing in at a hefty 25.4 ounces (720 grams) the diecast all-metal bodied 35-L feels very solid and well balanced, and its roundish ends nestle comfortably in average-sized hands. Measuring a moderate-sized 5.2 x 3.1 x 2.5 inches (139 x 79 x 64mm) W x H X D, you can easily shoot for long stretches without undue strain, and the controls are logically (and conventionally) placed. The sole exception is the aperture scale on the front of the lens, which on the 35-L (but not the 35-S) requires a slight backward tilt of the camera to see and set properly.

Two-stroke wind lever of Topcom 35-L and 35-S is ergonomically comtoured, has very smooth act...jpeg
Two-stroke wind levers of Topcon 35-L and 35-S are ergonomically contoured, have very smooth action, but are not as fast as single-stroke levers.

Lens barrel of my Topcon 35-L. Front aperture ring is hart to set wiyhut tiltin the camera ba...jpeg
Lens barrel of my Topcon 35-L. Front aperture ring is hard to set without tilting the camera back a bit so you can see the f/stops.

The short throw left-handed focusing tab operates with silky smoothness and turns only 90∘ to cover the entire focusing range, which is marked to 2.7 feet but gets down to about 2.6 feet (unmarked). The beautifully contoured two-stroke wind lever is ratcheted and advances the film in one long 180∘ stroke and one shorter stroke of about 140∘. It too operates with consummate smoothness and there’s a distinctive low-pitched “clunk” at the end of the second stroke as the shutter is cocked and the subtractive coaxial frame counter counts down one notch. Of course, as with all two-stroke winding systems (e.g. the one on the first run of Leica M3s and all Konica IIIAs) it’s not as fast as a single stroke system, so the Topcon 35-S and 35-L are not ideal for shooting fast action or sports. The shutter release requires moderate finger force, and its action is so smooth and predictable it reminds me of the release on my mid ‘60s Leica M3. Another M3-like feature is the lift-and turn rewind knob, which measures about ¾ of an inch in diameter. This makes rewinding faster than with an M3 but still not as fast as a crank.

Topcon 35-L with box, manual, accessory selenium meter with LV readouts. jpeg.jpeg
Topcon 35-L with box, manual, accessory selenium meter with LV readouts. A kit in this condition is very hard to find and likely to see you back $500 plus.

Perhaps the nicest and most defining feature of the Topcon 35-L (and the other two models in the series) its big, bright 1:1 (life-size) range/viewfinder with reflected (Albada-type) parallax compensating frame line. With an actual and effective base length (EBL) of about 58mm, the rangefinder provides sufficient accuracy to focus the 4.4cm (44mm) f.2 Topcor lens while permitting fast focusing that covers the entire focusing range in a ¼ turn of the focusing ring. The yellowish rectangular focusing patch is well defined and it’s easy to bring the moving and stationary images of the coincident image rangefinder into perfect alignment. The yellowish parallax-compensating frame line at the extreme outer edges if the finder is hard to see in its entirety, especially fi\or eyeglass wearers, and achieving precise composition may require moving your eye around to determine all four borders of the frame. Once you get used to it, it’s not as bad as it sounds. However, it’s noteworthy that one of the Topcon’s archrivals, the Konica IIIA, has a much easier to see projected viewfinder frame line system that not only compensates for parallax error but also shrinks the filed if view as you focus closer to compensate for the increase in effective focal length that narrows the field of view. Of course, the Konica IIA has its own issues, like an idiosyncratic two-stroke vertical film wind lever perched on the front of the camera that I’ve never learned to love. Chacun à son goût.

Topcon 35-S outfit with boxes, fitted leather case. Orginal 1956 U.S. selling price: $109!.jpeg
Topcon 35-S outfit with boxes, fitted leather case. Orginal 1956 U.S. selling price, $109!

Despite its imperfections and quirks, the Topcon 35-L is one of my very favorite walk-around cameras and its on-film performance, even at the widest apertures, is just shy of spectacular. I’d love to have a Topcon 35-S, which has no accursed LV ring and doeshave a 10-bladed lens diaphragm, but I haven’t been able to find a clean one without issues at an attractive price. Speaking of prices, you can snag a reasonably clean working Topcon 35-L or 35-S for about $150, and a near mint one for $300 to $350, but the vast majority are offered by Japanese sellers that now add a hefty shipping charge that includes prepaid customs duties for U.S. buyers only.

User reviews of the Topcon 35-L

(most of the following comments also apply to the Topcon 35-S)

Topcon 35-L rangefinder camera: users praise its excellent build quality and outstanding lens. However, some users note its heavy weight and quirky design, which may make it less suitable for everyday use.

Key Takeaways from User Reviews

Build Quality:
The camera is widely described as being "built like a tank," with a very solid, all-metal construction and smooth operation. The internal mechanics, such as the film advance, are often noted for their precision and durability, comparable to more well-known high-end brands like Leica, Nikon.

Optics: The noninterchangeable Topcor 4.4cm f/2 (or 44mm f/2) lens receives high acclaim for its optical quality. Topcor lenses in general have a strong reputation among collectors and users for producing sharp images with good contrast and color rendition.

Viewfinder: The original 35-L features a bright 1:1 Albada viewfinder with automatic parallax correction. A later, modified version of the finder is brighter overall but has less eye relief, which may be an issue for eyeglass wearers. The rangefinder patch itself is functional but may not be exceptionally bright.

Handling & Ergonomics:

Pros:
Users appreciate the smooth, predictable action of the shutter release, that reduces camera shake. The double-stroke film winding mechanism is praised as sturdy and smooth.

Cons: The camera is heavy and bulky ("a brick") compared to many contemporaries. Its unique design can be quirky and awkward for some users, making it more of a "change of pace" camera than a daily user.

Reliability & Repair: While durable, these cameras are vintage, so finding fully functional models can be a challenge (e.g., shutters may be slow, or focusing stiff). Given their relative rarity and the general scarcity of repair parts and specialists, repairs can be difficult or uneconomical.

Historical Context & Value: The Topcon 35-L is considered a "forgotten gem" or an "under the radar" classic. Because they were vastly outsild by rivals like Nikon, Konica, and Canon they can sometimes be found at lower prices than comparable competitor models, offering good value for collectors and enthusiasts.

Overall: users who appreciate a robust, well-engineered mechanical camera and high-quality vintage optics tend to be very satisfied with the Topcon 35-L, provided they can overlook its substantial size and ergonomic quirks. (I agree!) You can view sample photos taken with the camera on the Lomography site.

A site for hard core nerds who want to know more about the Topcon 35-S

To find out more than you ever wanted to know about the Topcon 35-S go to the Oreate AI Blog (oreateai.com) and find Yoshio Oze’s Analysis of The Topcon 35-S Camera Technology From Tokyo Optical (1956). It’s comprehensive all right but fair warning, a PhD in physics really helps!
 
Last edited:
I must be honest here, aesthetically, these cameras are simply par for the course as concerns Japanese rangefinders. If I were to name an "elegant" one, I'd probably suggest something like the Kowa Kallo 35. Of course beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and all that.
 
I must be honest here, aesthetically, these cameras are simply par for the course as concerns Japanese rangefinders. If I were to name an "elegant" one, I'd probably suggest something like the Kowa Kallo 35. Of course beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and all that.
The Kowa Kallo with f/1.4 lens looks elegant to me; the other models listed as Kowa Kallo 35 not so much. As you note not everyone agrees on esthetics or, as the Romans said, de gustibus non est disputandem!
 
You've got me looking critically at my collection of fixed lens rangefinders. The old ones didn't have particularly bright or large finders and most have dimmed over the years along with my eyesight.
Among my Retinas the IIc has the brightest finder. Oddly, the Retina II had parallax correction, which was dropped in later models.
Several later cameras including the Yashica Lynx and the Minolta 7S have big, bright finders and parallax correction, but they are exempted from the elegant category by their size and weight.
I have to admit I was completely unaware of the Topcons.
 
The Topcon rangefinders are indeed great cameras. For a long time my favorite fixed lens rangefinder was Konica IIIA and IIIM. I still love those, but I find the Topcon 35S and 35L to be my favs. The finders are really wonderful. The lenses are great.
It is interesting that the Konica and Topcon (and others, too) put lenses on their fixed lens rangefinders that were as good as, or the same as, the lenses for interchangeable lenses cameras. I have adapted a Konica III 48 f2 to use on my Nikon ZF and I’m enjoying it immensely.
 
The Topcon rangefinders are indeed great cameras. For a long time my favorite fixed lens rangefinder was Konica IIIA and IIIM. I still love those, but I find the Topcon 35S and 35L to be my favs. The finders are really wonderful. The lenses are great.
It is interesting that the Konica and Topcon (and others, too) put lenses on their fixed lens rangefinders that were as good as, or the same as, the lenses for interchangeable lenses cameras. I have adapted a Konica III 48 f2 to use on my Nikon ZF and I’m enjoying it immensely.
Thanks for your thoughts. The Konica IIIA is an awesome camera except for that klunky vertical, front-mounted double-stroke wind system. Overall the viewfinder frame lines are better than the single continuous frame in the Topcon 35-L or 35-S and the rangefinder is roughly equal. They say the one with the 50mm f/1.8 Hexanon is a tad better than the 48mm f/2, but the camera's proportions look better with the slightly slower lens.
 
Last edited:
Back in the early 2000’s I ran across the Topcon 35-L on Ebay and decided it looked like a fixed lens camera I would enjoy carrying instead of the changeable lens RF’s I had already purchased in my early days of vintage cameras. It was my first introduction to the Topcon name and has cost me dearly with my 20+yrs of collecting and using Topcon lenses for my range of Leotax cameras and my recent passion for Topcon SLR’s and their accompanying lens range.
But back to the 35-L… I took it on a vacation to CA and shot 2-3 rolls through it, and discovered how much I fell in love with it’s understated elegance and after processing the film, it’s exceptional optical quality. The meter was handy and completed the “look” and once I found it’s original lens hood, it became one of my favorites.
Many years under the bridge, I now have 2 35-L’s and 2 35-S’s just because… Have never shot the 35-S but would assume it has the same optics other than the aperture blade difference which I was not aware of.
Always thought it was interesting that Topcon made the lens 4.4cm instead of the much more common 4.5 or 4.8. Don’t really know if that is truly the exact focal length but certainly is odd.
I also have Kallo’s, the 140 and Wides as well as Konica 111, 111A, and 111M and other than the 111M which I find totally unique with the built in meter and a beautiful camera which draws more attention than most any other RF I have ever carried, the Topcon 35-L is still my fave…
Just my 2 cents, Jason😉
 
Never seen one before, looks very sleek and solid.

Jason, IYHO, what happened to Topcon, why didn't they keep up with Nikon and Canon? Perhaps that's a different thread, never mind.

It does look less clunky than my Konica IIIA, but clunky or not, mine did every well by me for all of Junior High School and the first year of High School.

Thanks.

B2
 
Back in the early 2000’s I ran across the Topcon 35-L on Ebay and decided it looked like a fixed lens camera I would enjoy carrying instead of the changeable lens RF’s I had already purchased in my early days of vintage cameras. It was my first introduction to the Topcon name and has cost me dearly with my 20+yrs of collecting and using Topcon lenses for my range of Leotax cameras and my recent passion for Topcon SLR’s and their accompanying lens range.
But back to the 35-L… I took it on a vacation to CA and shot 2-3 rolls through it, and discovered how much I fell in love with it’s understated elegance and after processing the film, it’s exceptional optical quality. The meter was handy and completed the “look” and once I found it’s original lens hood, it became one of my favorites.
Many years under the bridge, I now have 2 35-L’s and 2 35-S’s just because… Have never shot the 35-S but would assume it has the same optics other than the aperture blade difference which I was not aware of.
Always thought it was interesting that Topcon made the lens 4.4cm instead of the much more common 4.5 or 4.8. Don’t really know if that is truly the exact focal length but certainly is odd.
I also have Kallo’s, the 140 and Wides as well as Konica 111, 111A, and 111M and other than the 111M which I find totally unique with the built in meter and a beautiful camera which draws more attention than most any other RF I have ever carried, the Topcon 35-L is still my fave…
Just my 2 cents, Jason😉
Wow--that's more like a buck and a half, not 2 cents! For reference, 43.27 is the actual diagonal measurement of the 24 x 36mm format, so theoretically, a 44mm (4.4cm) lens is pretty close to "normal." However, for historical reasons (namely its cinematic origins) 50mm has come down to us as the normal lens for full-frame 35mm still photography and a 44mm lens (or a 43mm or a 45mm) is cosidered "semi-wide." FYI the Topcon 35-S is the same great camera as the 35-L and, in my arrogant opinion, the omission of the LV ring and its 10-bladed (instead of 5-bladed) lens diaphragm make it slightly better overall then the 35-L. Despite my dislike of its front-mounted vertical wind lever the Konica IIIA is a superb camera with an awesome projected-frame-line viewfinder and a great 50mm f/1.8 or 48mm F/2 Hexanon lens. Conceptually, the Konica dual-frame IIIM is even more impressive but they um "messed" it up by adding that ridiculous hinged flip-up selenium cell meter, thereby transforming what should have been a landmark into an unreliable kludge. If you check the online auction listings for the Konica IIIM you'll discover that only about 10% of them have working meters, and that a fair number of users have removed that ugly meter cell. Suggestion: run som film through your Topcon 35-S's--you'll love 'em!
 
There are so many ‘50s rangefinders that most elegant is tough. I have no experience with Topcon’s of any version, but I really like the early and mid 50’s Mamiya 35’s. The picture show a 35 I from 1949, top left; a 35 II from 1955; a 35 III wide from 1957 bottom left, and a more common 35 III also from 1957, bottom right.

The 35 I was odd in that it moved the film plane instead of the lens by turning a thumb wheel on the back, but it did have a coupled rangefinder and a bright viewfinder. The lens is a Konishiroku Hexar 50/3.5. It is interesting, but could not be called elegant. The advance knob also cocks the shutter. It has “made in occupied Japan” embossed in the back leatherette.

The 35 II is much smaller and simpler in design and operation. It lacks an advance lever, and has a Seikosha MX shutter and a Setagaya Koki Sekor S 45/3,5 lens. This would be my choice for best looking or elegant of the 3 versions, but I really miss no strap fixings, and the 3.5 lens is a bit limiting. I found a Stereo Realist Series V hood and filter adapter that work perfectly for the 31.5 OD of the filter ring

The 35 III is slightly more advanced and has adopted the LVS shutter. I don’t mind this at all since I got into these rangefinders late and just learned how to use it with a meter that reads out exposure values. The 35 III wide has a Mamiya Sekor 35/2.8 lens, and the regular 35III has a M/S 48/2.0 lens, though some came with a 2.8.

They all have very smooth advance and shutter cocking, are very quiet, and have bright rangefinder patches in a nice pink. The III’s have frame lines added.

If the 35 II had strap fixings I would use it more, since it is so simple and (in my opinion), elegant. The 35 I is fun but since it is rare and funky, I have not used it with film yet. I plan to do one roll just to see what the Hexar lens is like. My go to Mamiyas for an out the door walk are the 35 III’s, since they have faster lenses and just feel good, finish is beautiful, and they are mechanically well done.

I have a few later 60’s Mamiya rangefinders but they got bigger and more blocky and complex with mostly non functional coupled meters or even planetary gearing that I don’t even want to get into, (again). I also have a few Aires rangefinders and I like what they can do with the Coral lenses they use, but the Mamiyas just feel nicer.


IMG_2208.jpeg

.IMG_2209.jpeg
 
Here are my favorites from that period. I have had trouble figuring the dates but the earlier ones started in 1957.

The Balda Gang by Neal Wellons, on Flickr
I have a Balda rangefinder 35 with built-in selenium meter like the right-hand one in your photo and I like it very much, especially its (for lack of a better word) Bauhaus form factor, but its lens (a decent 50mm f/2.8 Baldanar or Isco) is not in the same league as the superb 4.4cm f/2 Topcor on the Topcon 35-L or 35-S.
 
Last edited:
There are so many ‘50s rangefinders that most elegant is tough. I have no experience with Topcon’s of any version, but I really like the early and mid 50’s Mamiya 35’s. The picture show a 35 I from 1949, top left; a 35 II from 1955; a 35 III wide from 1957 bottom left, and a more common 35 III also from 1957, bottom right.

The 35 I was odd in that it moved the film plane instead of the lens by turning a thumb wheel on the back, but it did have a coupled rangefinder and a bright viewfinder. The lens is a Konishiroku Hexar 50/3.5. It is interesting, but could not be called elegant. The advance knob also cocks the shutter. It has “made in occupied Japan” embossed in the back leatherette.

The 35 II is much smaller and simpler in design and operation. It lacks an advance lever, and has a Seikosha MX shutter and a Setagaya Koki Sekor S 45/3,5 lens. This would be my choice for best looking or elegant of the 3 versions, but I really miss no strap fixings, and the 3.5 lens is a bit limiting. I found a Stereo Realist Series V hood and filter adapter that work perfectly for the 31.5 OD of the filter ring

The 35 III is slightly more advanced and has adopted the LVS shutter. I don’t mind this at all since I got into these rangefinders late and just learned how to use it with a meter that reads out exposure values. The 35 III wide has a Mamiya Sekor 35/2.8 lens, and the regular 35III has a M/S 48/2.0 lens, though some came with a 2.8.

They all have very smooth advance and shutter cocking, are very quiet, and have bright rangefinder patches in a nice pink. The III’s have frame lines added.

If the 35 II had strap fixings I would use it more, since it is so simple and (in my opinion), elegant. The 35 I is fun but since it is rare and funky, I have not used it with film yet. I plan to do one roll just to see what the Hexar lens is like. My go to Mamiyas for an out the door walk are the 35 III’s, since they have faster lenses and just feel good, finish is beautiful, and they are mechanically well done.

I have a few later 60’s Mamiya rangefinders but they got bigger and more blocky and complex with mostly non functional coupled meters or even planetary gearing that I don’t even want to get into, (again). I also have a few Aires rangefinders and I like what they can do with the Coral lenses they use, but the Mamiyas just feel nicer.


View attachment 4886627

.View attachment 4886628
I also have this Mamiya Wide E which has the best of both worlds if you like the Mamiya brand. It has a Topcor 3.5cm/F2.8 lens, probably the same optical formula that Topcon made for their interchangable lens used with Leotax RF's. It is quite similar to the Mamiya Wide but has replace the RF capability with a built in meter. I believe the Mamiya Wide has a Mamiya-Secor 3.5cm/F2.8 lens? Probably a toss up as to which is a better optic, but I do love the Topcor lenses.
 

Attachments

  • Mamiya-Mamiya-35-Wide-E.jpg
    Mamiya-Mamiya-35-Wide-E.jpg
    15.9 KB · Views: 2
There are so many ‘50s rangefinders that most elegant is tough. I have no experience with Topcon’s of any version, but I really like the early and mid 50’s Mamiya 35’s. The picture show a 35 I from 1949, top left; a 35 II from 1955; a 35 III wide from 1957 bottom left, and a more common 35 III also from 1957, bottom right.

The 35 I was odd in that it moved the film plane instead of the lens by turning a thumb wheel on the back, but it did have a coupled rangefinder and a bright viewfinder. The lens is a Konishiroku Hexar 50/3.5. It is interesting, but could not be called elegant. The advance knob also cocks the shutter. It has “made in occupied Japan” embossed in the back leatherette.

The 35 II is much smaller and simpler in design and operation. It lacks an advance lever, and has a Seikosha MX shutter and a Setagaya Koki Sekor S 45/3,5 lens. This would be my choice for best looking or elegant of the 3 versions, but I really miss no strap fixings, and the 3.5 lens is a bit limiting. I found a Stereo Realist Series V hood and filter adapter that work perfectly for the 31.5 OD of the filter ring

The 35 III is slightly more advanced and has adopted the LVS shutter. I don’t mind this at all since I got into these rangefinders late and just learned how to use it with a meter that reads out exposure values. The 35 III wide has a Mamiya Sekor 35/2.8 lens, and the regular 35III has a M/S 48/2.0 lens, though some came with a 2.8.

They all have very smooth advance and shutter cocking, are very quiet, and have bright rangefinder patches in a nice pink. The III’s have frame lines added.

If the 35 II had strap fixings I would use it more, since it is so simple and (in my opinion), elegant. The 35 I is fun but since it is rare and funky, I have not used it with film yet. I plan to do one roll just to see what the Hexar lens is like. My go to Mamiyas for an out the door walk are the 35 III’s, since they have faster lenses and just feel good, finish is beautiful, and they are mechanically well done.

I have a few later 60’s Mamiya rangefinders but they got bigger and more blocky and complex with mostly non functional coupled meters or even planetary gearing that I don’t even want to get into, (again). I also have a few Aires rangefinders and I like what they can do with the Coral lenses they use, but the Mamiyas just feel nicer.


View attachment 4886627

.View attachment 4886628
I guess I should have read this a bit closer before posting a reply, but I do see you have a Mamiya Wide which does have the 3.5cm/F2.8 Mamiya-Sekor. I have a couple of the Mamiya's from this period with my favorite being the interchangeable back Mamiya Magazine 35. Even had the F2 version of this camera before a sold it to another RFF Member a number of years ago. Great cameras also....
 
I really like the Mamiya wide, since I take quite a few landscape photos, plus it works in tight rooms better than the 48mm. It has a slight light leak unless I use the bottom half of its ER case. i got it from a seller who did not realize it was not easily found. I just thought it fit the elegant description Jason started this thread for.
I have to confess I just got a Mamiya Magazine 35 in great shape, (2.8), though I have not used it yet. I also found a spare back for it. I don’t think it really looks “elegant” but more functional, though it is a mid 50’s rangefinder. I hope to try it out when the weather warms up a bit.
 
Back
Top Bottom