Didier
"Deed"
Received the replacement R-D1s
Received the replacement R-D1s
I have received the replacement R-D1s this week. The sensor and framelines are OK (I mean are not tilted), the rangefinder adjustment is, as Jon Cuff of RW had tested himself, within the specs of Epson (1 inch tolerance at close focus wide open, measured with a Color Skopar PII 35/2.5), but not really spot on on close focus with my 35 summilux asph, 50 summicron, 40 Nokton and 50/1.2 Canon; which have the the sharpness 2-5cm after the plane where I was focused.
This leads to endless discussions about focusing tolerances of each lens, as I believe this may vary from sample to sample. For instance, I owned the 35 Skopar PII two years ago, and it overfocused very strongly at infinity (on a CLA'd M6).
The horizontal alignment of the R-D1s was spot on at infinity, but after only 70 shots, it is slightly disaligned again. The vertical alignment was already slightly off when I opened the box.
To conclude, the camera is in a better state than the one I sent in, but still not 100% satisfying. Additionally, I encountered unexpected problems with focusing the Summilux 75. Not that I use this lens much on the Epson, but anyway I would have liked to use it from time to time.
Nevertheless I decided to keep the Epson, because of two reasons: the alternative digital rangefinder, the M8, is out of my financial reach (and not without flaws, too); and selling the whole M/LTM gear to jump into a DSLR system would not suit my photographing philosophy (and selling my M/LTM glass would break my heart).
Didier
Received the replacement R-D1s
I have received the replacement R-D1s this week. The sensor and framelines are OK (I mean are not tilted), the rangefinder adjustment is, as Jon Cuff of RW had tested himself, within the specs of Epson (1 inch tolerance at close focus wide open, measured with a Color Skopar PII 35/2.5), but not really spot on on close focus with my 35 summilux asph, 50 summicron, 40 Nokton and 50/1.2 Canon; which have the the sharpness 2-5cm after the plane where I was focused.
This leads to endless discussions about focusing tolerances of each lens, as I believe this may vary from sample to sample. For instance, I owned the 35 Skopar PII two years ago, and it overfocused very strongly at infinity (on a CLA'd M6).
The horizontal alignment of the R-D1s was spot on at infinity, but after only 70 shots, it is slightly disaligned again. The vertical alignment was already slightly off when I opened the box.
To conclude, the camera is in a better state than the one I sent in, but still not 100% satisfying. Additionally, I encountered unexpected problems with focusing the Summilux 75. Not that I use this lens much on the Epson, but anyway I would have liked to use it from time to time.
Nevertheless I decided to keep the Epson, because of two reasons: the alternative digital rangefinder, the M8, is out of my financial reach (and not without flaws, too); and selling the whole M/LTM gear to jump into a DSLR system would not suit my photographing philosophy (and selling my M/LTM glass would break my heart).
Didier
Last edited: