Pascal
Member
I have 2 contax N1 bodies (almost new) with 24-85mm, 28-80mm, 70-200mm, 70-300mm, and 50mm f1.4 lenses. Both N1 bodies have databacks and the grid screens. Also have two TLA360 flash units to go with the camera bodies. ... and spare screens, eyecups, etc... just about all accessories I would need. All lenses have their respective hard to find hoods also.
I also have 2 like new G2 bodies (both have about as perfect focus as I could ask for) and have the following lenses: 21mm, 28mm, 45mm, 90mm, and 35-70 zoom. Again, both bodies have the GD-2 data backs on them. Also have two TLA 200 flash units and all the accessories needed for the system including replacement eyecups and what not. Again, all lenses have hoods and cases, etc.
Both systems as far as I have used them seem complete to me and each lens/ body/accessory was handpicked from the choices I had so i would get the sharpest/best of the lot.
I need to let go of one system and am having a tough time deciding which one to keep :bang:
I shoot mostly family / everyday stuff including kids, landscapes, buildings, indoors etc.... general stuff. Both camera's seem to give decent images but deep down i know the N1 system is more versatile and images out of the N1 system seem to come out better for me than when I use the G2 system.
Of course, I know the limitations of the G2 system with lens focal lengths. On the N1, I can use a tele zoom up to 300mm while with the G2, 90mm is as far as it will go.
Both serve well for portrait shots.
I love the fact that I could get nice clean shots taken at sundown with the G2 with a shutter speed as low as 1/15th which I know there is no way I can get with the N even with the 50mm f1.4 lens.
Then there's what closet fondler's like me like to see as the "coolness factor" of the G2.
Also love the fact that the G-system with flash and lenses, takes up a lot less room than the N. But there is no denying for me that the N system pictures are easier for me. Maybe I simply need to spend more time with my G2 system... who knows.
What do users of both systems recommend.... which one would you keep.
I also have 2 like new G2 bodies (both have about as perfect focus as I could ask for) and have the following lenses: 21mm, 28mm, 45mm, 90mm, and 35-70 zoom. Again, both bodies have the GD-2 data backs on them. Also have two TLA 200 flash units and all the accessories needed for the system including replacement eyecups and what not. Again, all lenses have hoods and cases, etc.
Both systems as far as I have used them seem complete to me and each lens/ body/accessory was handpicked from the choices I had so i would get the sharpest/best of the lot.
I need to let go of one system and am having a tough time deciding which one to keep :bang:
I shoot mostly family / everyday stuff including kids, landscapes, buildings, indoors etc.... general stuff. Both camera's seem to give decent images but deep down i know the N1 system is more versatile and images out of the N1 system seem to come out better for me than when I use the G2 system.
Of course, I know the limitations of the G2 system with lens focal lengths. On the N1, I can use a tele zoom up to 300mm while with the G2, 90mm is as far as it will go.
Both serve well for portrait shots.
I love the fact that I could get nice clean shots taken at sundown with the G2 with a shutter speed as low as 1/15th which I know there is no way I can get with the N even with the 50mm f1.4 lens.
Then there's what closet fondler's like me like to see as the "coolness factor" of the G2.
Also love the fact that the G-system with flash and lenses, takes up a lot less room than the N. But there is no denying for me that the N system pictures are easier for me. Maybe I simply need to spend more time with my G2 system... who knows.
What do users of both systems recommend.... which one would you keep.