Rhodes
Time Lord
I wrongly expose a LGPro 400 at iso 64 today. I went for a walk and decide to end the last frames of a kodachrome 64. Since the day was cloudy and toke a legacy pro 400 to experiment, but only a few moments ago I remember that i didn't change the lightmeter seting. :bang:
To help, I also decided to use my yellow filter, arrghhhh! And I did not got before since the light metter gived me f/8 or f/11 at 1/250 or 1/125, so normal for a iso 400 film, etc. Oh my giddy ant...
Any chance to save the film? I was thinking of developing in XTOL 1:1 when I end it!
To help, I also decided to use my yellow filter, arrghhhh! And I did not got before since the light metter gived me f/8 or f/11 at 1/250 or 1/125, so normal for a iso 400 film, etc. Oh my giddy ant...
Any chance to save the film? I was thinking of developing in XTOL 1:1 when I end it!
Roger Hicks
Veteran
2-1/2 stops over?
Should be OK, especially with a fine grain developer where the true ISO falls and you're less than 2 stops over.
Do you scan or wet print?
Cheers,
R.
Should be OK, especially with a fine grain developer where the true ISO falls and you're less than 2 stops over.
Do you scan or wet print?
Cheers,
R.
Last edited:
Rhodes
Time Lord
I scan the negatives (still no room for the rest)!
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Scanty development (-15%) should make scanning easier.
Cheers,
R.
Cheers,
R.
Rhodes
Time Lord
From the time for iso 400, isn't?
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Rhodes
Time Lord
Thank you very much!
Freakscene
Obscure member
The Kodak data sheet for Xtol has times for very overexposed films - including Neopan 400 shot down to Ei100. I accidentally shot a roll of Neopan 400 (same thing) at EI 50 last year and developed from the Kodak time and it worked fine; the tonality was a bit strange but the sharpness and detail were surprisingly well maintained. My guess is that your roll of film will be fine.
Marty
Marty