Thardy
Veteran
I'm impressed that it 's going to have a 35 mm full frame sensor which takes lenses made for crop cameras.
Last edited:
Chris101 said:With all due respect, this 'secret friend with inside connections' bit has been done to death.
igoesmyth said:18 MP is fine but a full frame (24mmx36mm) sensor that will not vignette a DX lens is mathmatically and physically immpossible.
igoesmyth said:Nikon gets it's sensors from SONY.
Sony does not make a FF sensor.
So where would Nikon be getting it?? Kodak?
You won't have to worry about saving for soon as this is a fantasy.
david
MadMan2k said:I'm thrilled with my 4mp sensor in my 6 year old camera, and I still run punch cards in my 3,000 square foot mainframe. It took me 6 hours to write this post.
fdigital said:Also, I like using my 24mm lens or 28mm lens or 35mm lens for its intended use, not as a standard focal length on the crop sensor. That irritates the crap out of me.
Tuolumne said:It apparently has a switch that flips it back and forth from full-frame mode to 1.5x crop-factor mode. I assume that means it would have lower resolution in the 1.5x crop factor mode.
/T
Tuolumne said:I was talking to a friend today. Well connected in the Nikon world from previous industry experience. He was telling me about a new high end Nikon coming this September. 18 megapixels, full frame 35mm sensor with no crop factor, backward compatible with lenses made for 1.5x crop factor. I love my D200. I guess I better start saving for this baby.
/T
NB23 said:Chris,
Beating to death, if not done with a stinking wet rotten sock, is not enough.
Tuolumne said:Remember, sensor technoloy obey's Moore's law.
/T
sepiareverb said:Too late for me- Nikon dropped the ball with the first generation of DSLR's that wouldn't meter with Ai or AiS lenses. I couldn't justify a new camera AND new lenses. Leica and Zeiss have my business now.
Seems that if Nikon is to survive they'll have to admit that Canon was right to go full frame and continue what WAS great about the Nikon system- the nearly complete backward compatability of the F mount.
Socke said:Moore's law is about getting more into less, i.E. smaller chips with more tranistors.
Making bigger chips is not covered by this.