horosu
Well-known
A lot of people would pay premium prices for high-performance lenses.
Let's imagine that Zeiss would come out with a 35/1.4 that would have almost zero distortion (like the 35/2 Biogon), no flare (ditto) and high-resolving power, while being accetably large.
And: no focus shift 😉
I think that there definitely is a market for upscale lenses. The M9 has reinforced that trend IMHO.
Let's imagine that Zeiss would come out with a 35/1.4 that would have almost zero distortion (like the 35/2 Biogon), no flare (ditto) and high-resolving power, while being accetably large.
And: no focus shift 😉
I think that there definitely is a market for upscale lenses. The M9 has reinforced that trend IMHO.
I beleive the reason that Zeiss don't have faster ZM lenses is that they won't compromise image quality. i.e. if going wide causes the resulting MTF figures to fall outside their standards, they won't do it. BUT it's possible they are going to relax their standards to appeal to the consumerist tendancies of the M Mount market. We'll just have to be patient instead of wildly speculating just like the average consumer.
remember those zeiss lenses ( except 16 and 85/2) are not made by zeiss. Cosina/voightlander make em and aren't good enough for zeiss to let them do the 16 and 85/2. So if zeiss were to make very high performing 1.4 lenses, would they be any better than voightlander lenses and if not then why bother because everyone would buy the voightlander cos they are cheaper. But if zeiss makes em then they will cost a lot of money and therefore compete directly with leica on price.
And how many people here have got the zeiss 85/2 and 16? Not many becuase they don't like the pricing. And how many who want 1.4 lenses will pay new prices for them if made by zeiss?