silent1
Well-known
My CLE has arrived yesterday, I'm so happy! 
My first impression just after I unwrapped it was: My, that's so little! And light! Compared to my M6TTL, the little CLE is about 15-20% smaller! Good thing as I plan to use it as my everyday camera.
My currently setup includes a Nokton 40mm f1.4 which I learnt to love lately.
The only thing which bugs me is the LH5 hood which being noticeably larger than the lens itself partially obscures the light-in window, preventing the light to fully illuminate the RF patch which is kind of dim in the lower part. Does anybody else have the same problem? Apart from that, this combo looks just perfect!
My first impression just after I unwrapped it was: My, that's so little! And light! Compared to my M6TTL, the little CLE is about 15-20% smaller! Good thing as I plan to use it as my everyday camera.
My currently setup includes a Nokton 40mm f1.4 which I learnt to love lately.
The only thing which bugs me is the LH5 hood which being noticeably larger than the lens itself partially obscures the light-in window, preventing the light to fully illuminate the RF patch which is kind of dim in the lower part. Does anybody else have the same problem? Apart from that, this combo looks just perfect!

filmtwit
Desperate but not serious
I run mine without hood.
Is your Nokton single or double coated?
I ask, because if it's double coated, you'll probably not need the hood most of the time.
Is your Nokton single or double coated?
I ask, because if it's double coated, you'll probably not need the hood most of the time.
silent1
Well-known
I run mine without hood.
Is your Nokton single or double coated?
I ask, because if it's double coated, you'll probably not need the hood most of the time.
It is indeed single coated.
I shot some 4-5 rolls last weekend without using the hood. Will see if flare is a problem.
lxmike
M2 fan.
Well done on getting a CLE, would love to own one
sol33
Established
The only thing which bugs me is the LH5 hood which being noticeably larger than the lens itself partially obscures the light-in window, preventing the light to fully illuminate the RF patch which is kind of dim in the lower part. Does anybody else have the same problem?
Have a look here:
http://www.cameraquest.com/voigt4014.htm
and here:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=942931
If it really bothers you, you can file the hood down or else get a different hood. I have no personal experience on this because I do not own a Nokton...
umboody
Established
I haven't shot much on my Nokton 40/1.4 SC (which I've just recently sold), but I've never really had any issues with it flaring under normal working conditions.
silent1
Well-known
Have a look here:
http://www.cameraquest.com/voigt4014.htm
and here:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=942931
If it really bothers you, you can file the hood down or else get a different hood. I have no personal experience on this because I do not own a Nokton...
Thanks! That was an interesting reading.
MP/CLE
Established
silent1...some of my best shots were taken with my CLE with rokkor 40 in Roma in '06. Enjoy!
Etabeta
Member
In my experience the hood is not an issue. I prefere to keep it on, as a better protection of the lens. But I shot not less than 2 hundred photographs in India with my Nokton f1.4 without hood and, in spite of the scorching sun, I couldn't notice any flare at all. By the way, I own two CLE bodies and I take both on my trips in order to shoot 50 and 400 ISO. Just three lenses (Ultron f/2 and TeleElmarit M 90mm f/2.8, plus the Nokton of course), a few filters and the tiny CLE electronic flash. All my gear can be stuffed into a small unobtrusive bag.
silent1
Well-known
In my experience the hood is not an issue. I prefere to keep it on, as a better protection of the lens. But I shot not less than 2 hundred photographs in India with my Nokton f1.4 without hood and, in spite of the scorching sun, I couldn't notice any flare at all. By the way, I own two CLE bodies and I take both on my trips in order to shoot 50 and 400 ISO. Just three lenses (Ultron f/2 and TeleElmarit M 90mm f/2.8, plus the Nokton of course), a few filters and the tiny CLE electronic flash. All my gear can be stuffed into a small unobtrusive bag.
Yes! That's what I like about my new CLE, the compactness!
AE and self timer are a very nice plus.
Btw, nice to know there are other CLE owners in Rome, if you meet me in the street with the CLE hanging from my neck say hi
I've used my 40 Nokton SC only on my CLE's, at first with no hood, then I got the LH-5 hood for it. I'm a little puzzled by the reports of blocking the RF window, as I didn't notice that problem using the hood... 
PS: I got my first CLE new in 1982, and it's been a fond favorite ever since. Lovely little camera!
PS: I got my first CLE new in 1982, and it's been a fond favorite ever since. Lovely little camera!
silent1
Well-known
I've used my 40 Nokton SC only on my CLE's, at first with no hood, then I got the LH-5 hood for it. I'm a little puzzled by the reports of blocking the RF window, as I didn't notice that problem using the hood...
PS: I got my first CLE new in 1982, and it's been a fond favorite ever since. Lovely little camera!
It does not block the RF window, but the light collecting window, resulting in a dim RF patch, at least in the lower half of the patch.
Sad, because I also looked for a LH-5 hood to complement my 40mm, and now that I finally found it I can't actually use it
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.