jpberger
Established
It also wet prints well-- it's a very good match for the Fuji crystal archive paper (which is what most people are using since you can't get the kodak in cut sheets anymore) The only issue is that the grain structure is hard to focus on with low magnification grain focusers (a problem with other kodak colour film as well). The grain in prints is about equal to the fuji 160s I used to use and it has more shadow detail at 800 than fuji 800z did- so it replaces both of these films for me. I really miss the 800z colour palate though) Have not had a chance to try the new 160 yet.