JoeFriday
Agent Provacateur
yeah, when are we invited out?Flyfisher Tom said:
New Member
- Thread starter Mike Stoesz
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 32
- Views 1K
R
ray_g
Guest
George S. said:
It's nice to hear that, George. I started a NW thread on PNet 2 days ago for OM photos, and I was beginning to think no one else uses them anymore!
dreilly
Chillin' in Geneva
- Local time
- 12:17 PM
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2004
- Messages
- 1,045
Welcome, Mike!
I'm the guy who recommended Mike check us out. I'm glad you're all giving your normally-warm welcome. I'd also love to hear some details comparing the VI-L and the P, since Joe's (P)ropoganda is making me to look on the Canon side of the world.
cheers
doug
I'm the guy who recommended Mike check us out. I'm glad you're all giving your normally-warm welcome. I'd also love to hear some details comparing the VI-L and the P, since Joe's (P)ropoganda is making me to look on the Canon side of the world.
cheers
doug
back alley
IMAGES
(P)ropoganda
ooh, i like that!
🙂joe
ooh, i like that!
🙂joe
Goodyear
Happy-snap ninja
ManGo - 'the missus' has suggested that a donation of ten or twenty quid from each of you would go a long way to rehabilitating me. She is a doctor - she should know these things.Manolo Gozales said:
Please do PM me for my Paypal account.
😀 😀
/edit: she actually did, as well! 😱
JoeFriday
Agent Provacateur
does Paypal take quid? isn't that the same as Monopoly money? 😉
Mike Stoesz
Member
Howdy from rainy Wyoming;
It is nice to have a bit of rain when the annual precipitation averages less than 25cm.
There seems to be a discussion about Canon P vs. VI going on now days.
I like both, but since I wear tri-focals or progressive lenses, I prefer the P most of the time. The VI-L finder is, as someone said earlier, a bit squinty. It is not nearly as difficult as the III, IIIa however. My P seems a bit brighter but the RF on the VI-L is a bit easier to see in some light conditions. In use, I usually have a 35 or 100 on the P and 50f1.2 on the VI-L.
In my opinion, the VI and the P are the best built and most functional of all the Canon RF's. I have yet to have a 7 or 7s or 7s2 that would take the stresses of hard PJ work.
On another topic, one I am not to mention, the worst selling decision I have made with RF cameras is to sell a Leica M-2 with 35f2.5 Nikor and 90mm Elmar for about $400.00.
Regards, Mike
It is nice to have a bit of rain when the annual precipitation averages less than 25cm.
There seems to be a discussion about Canon P vs. VI going on now days.
I like both, but since I wear tri-focals or progressive lenses, I prefer the P most of the time. The VI-L finder is, as someone said earlier, a bit squinty. It is not nearly as difficult as the III, IIIa however. My P seems a bit brighter but the RF on the VI-L is a bit easier to see in some light conditions. In use, I usually have a 35 or 100 on the P and 50f1.2 on the VI-L.
In my opinion, the VI and the P are the best built and most functional of all the Canon RF's. I have yet to have a 7 or 7s or 7s2 that would take the stresses of hard PJ work.
On another topic, one I am not to mention, the worst selling decision I have made with RF cameras is to sell a Leica M-2 with 35f2.5 Nikor and 90mm Elmar for about $400.00.
Regards, Mike
Goodyear
Happy-snap ninja
Why don't you try it and see?JoeFriday said:
FYI, 1 quid ~ 1.8 bucks 😉
Goodyear
Happy-snap ninja
Mike, don't make me retract my welcome.Mike Stoesz said:
:bang:
JoeFriday
Agent Provacateur
is a quid the same as a pound?
Goodyear
Happy-snap ninja
Yes.JoeFriday said:
😉
Mike Stoesz
Member
Howdy Goodyear,
If I take one in trade in the next year, I will deliver it to you in person.
Mike
If I take one in trade in the next year, I will deliver it to you in person.
Mike
Mike Stoesz
Member
Howdy Goodyear,
If I take one in trade in the next year, I will deliver it to you in person.
Mike
If I take one in trade in the next year, I will deliver it to you in person.
Mike
Similar threads
- Sticky
