porktaco
Well-known
hehehehehe
hehehehehe
ANd dont get me started on dorky oversized hoods. My God, the hoods get bigger and bigger every year.!
The 35/1.4 summilux is tiny in comparison.
This is illogical; why would SONY have Zeiss make such a monstrous lens for the digital camera?
The 35/1.4 summilux is tiny in comparison.
This is illogical; why would SONY have Zeiss make such a monstrous lens for the digital camera?
Have you seen the other Zeiss lenses in the full format wide angle area. They seem not to be capable (at their price point) to come up with something reasonably compact. I was looking at the 35 mm Zeiss Nikon options. That's a joke. Sorry. The NEX needs neat small native lenses. Can't see any.
Rgds
Ivo
Have you seen the other Zeiss lenses in the full format wide angle area. They seem not to be capable (at their price point) to come up with something reasonably compact. I was looking at the 35 mm Zeiss Nikon options. That's a joke. Sorry. The NEX needs neat small native lenses. Can't see any.
Rgds
Ivo
The 25 Summilux is a more appropriate comparison, and it is closer in size, and it doesn't have an af motor or auto aperture. Zeiss isn't going to design lenses with massive distortion like m4/3 that need software correction.
Good thread about the design of the new Zeiss: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1000&message=39223743&changemode=1
Until they figure out how to produce small and high quality small sized fast lenses, use legacy lenses with the NEX.