Sejanus.Aelianus
Veteran
So long as good men do nothing, the evil will continue.
That being the case, I'm going to stay on the dark side and enjoy myself 😀
That being the case, I'm going to stay on the dark side and enjoy myself 😀
One thing that strikes me about the DF marketing is that it's the first camera specifically marketed to the older Baby Boomer generation, retirement aged people. For everything that has gone before, cameras and most all consumer goods have aimed at a vibrant young audience by using attractive, youthful models in exciting lifestyles (surfing, skiing, etc.). But for the DF we get a lone camper not doing much of anything around his campfire... and the promo videos are of AARP members like McNally and Krist rather than Chase Jarvis chasing snowboarders.
Not to make you feel old or anything but I bet we're going to see a lot more of this as the boomers hit retirement. While hipsters may desire this camera in the same way they want Lomo Petzvels, most of them simply can't afford it... where gramps simply has to cut back on his meds or sell a few painkillers to raise the coin.
I just confirmed the price in Australia.
$3,500 with the lens. 🙄
Just over £2k, so how come we get to pay another £700 on top for the combo? I reckon there's more enthusiasts in the UK than Australia per capita. Someones taking the mickey.
Because Nikon wouldn't make much money from selling manual lenses.
It works different - most noticeably, the focus area and confirmation do not coincide, you have to look somewhere on the margin LCD to see whether you are in focus and which way you are out. That is ok - or even superior - for critical tripod focusing, but it is next to useless for manual focus handheld work. From the F4 on all new Nikons I got in the past twenty-something years had a electronic focus indicator - I have purchased and used a split finder screen on all of them nonetheless.
FWIW, I am quite convinced that the screen on the DF will be (supposedly service) replaceable, as it is on the vast majority of Nikon DSLRs - if Nikon does not offer a split screen, third party makers will jump in, just like they did on all the consumer/prosumer DSLRs so far.
So the new camera is no easier to focus ai glass on than a D800, 700 or D600? Or am I missing something?
They only still make a handful and I wouldn't be surprised if they are new old stock or made from existing parts.
But I doubt that is the reason why. After all it even supports metering with non-AI lenses and they are pushing that in their advertising. It just doesn't make any sense that the screen is fixed and can't be swapped. This has been a unpredictable trend with Nikon since the D700. It just seems like an incredibly bad design choice.
Import taxes are one thing, VAT is another. In Spain, VAT is 21%, in Belgium it may be as high as 33% (25% VAT plus 8% "luxury taxes"). I would have to check if the VAT in Belgium is still as high, but I dout it has come down recently.
Thus 3,000 USD easily becomes 3,000 Euros or more.
About 20 years ago I visisted Japan and bought a 105mm micro Nikkor. It was half the price of what I would have paid for in a Belgian shop. The difference in price paid for my trip and two weeks stay.
Off topic but Harry how do you replace the D800 screen, I cannot find any 3rd party screen for it.
And no, not everyone with a real interest in this camera is a baby boomer about to retire, as some have pointed out. I haven't even turned half a century yet. Most of the cameras I use are older than me. 😎
But - can you be a poser before you turn 50 ? I'm afraid I own a Tivoli One wireless already... 😀
the whole controlled leaks and youtube teasers backfired on nikon. people's expectations were raised unrealistically, everyone expected a digital fm2, what they got instead is neither retro nor modern, its a bling camera.
Sony's A7 at half the price is 8mp more with focus peaking and light weight --- nikon is in trouble.
Import taxes are one thing, VAT is another. In Spain, VAT is 21%, in Belgium it may be as high as 33% (25% VAT plus 8% "luxury taxes"). I would have to check if the VAT in Belgium is still as high, but I doubt it has come down recently.
Thus 3,000 USD easily becomes 3,000 Euros or more.
About 20 years ago I visisted Japan and bought a 105mm micro Nikkor. It was half the price of what I would have paid for in a Belgian shop. The difference in price paid for my trip and two weeks stay.
Sorry, that never was true. There are 4 VAT rates in Belgium: 0, 6, 12 and 21%.
For luxury goods such as cameras, it is 21%.