Nikon DF

Do you perhaps have a Cosina Voigtlander 40mm f2.0? I would be really interested in seeing this lens on the Df.

Out of respect to Nikon, perhaps the 45/2.8 or 50/1.8 AIS pancake might be better to illustrate the Df with a compact lens so long as you are a beta tester.

No access to those pancakes at the moment. But I'm on my way home now and if family time permits I will put F3/Df/D800 together for your perusal and... errr... discussion 🙂 I can slap Ai-S 50/1.2 on it, smallest I got.
 
Vital (for me) functions located at the back:
- Menu button
- Review button
- Zoom in/out buttons
- Info button (not vital, but I like a quick overview of key settings at a glance and ability to change some non-direct setting without diving into menus)
- Metering switch
- AF/AE lock
- And indeed, very important, the focus point switch 🙂 I don't use center-point only, and I do use AF.

That pretty much covers most buttons on the back. And I'm not arguing against your requirements, i see your point. But the sacrifices you're willing to make in order to arrive to more "pure" experience are not applicable to me. Different strokes.
Thanks, this is nice to discuss. 🙂

I agree that some direct access buttons can't be removed on a serious DSLR :

- Menu
- Review
- Trash bin
- Zoom in/out
- WB

On a camera like the Df, the AE lock can be removed (this is what half-depressing the shutter is designed for on such a camera aimed to be used in A and M modes mainly). If the P mode was removed too, this would make plenty of sense.

The AF-lock is another question. But it could be combined with the AF L-switch.
The metering switch could easily be a collar around the shutter release, couldn't it ?
The focus point switch/multicontroller can stay.
The info button is useless if you can access the Info quickly through the main menu.

I'm not a Leica nut whatsoever but if you look at the rear panel of the M typ 240 you've got an idea of what Nikon could do with the Df2.

And no connectors doors everywhere on the next model please... for instance on the Df, gathering the battery and SD card doors is an excellent choice !

According to Nikon USA, the Df is compatible with the DK-17M magnifying eyepiece.

http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Product/Eyepieces/4793/DK-17M-Magnifying-Eyepiece.html

This is essential for me for optimal manual focus with my D700 bodies.

If this confirms, this is excellent news. I have myself loudly advertised the DK-17M some posts above. This may be the best alternative to any third party split-prism screen. It's now staying on my D700 eyepiece all the time. I wear glasses all the time too, but had no problem using the DK-17M to see the entire frame so far.

Yet the Df eyepoint is 3mm shorter than the D700 one... only a real life test can tell how the DK-17M works on the Df.
 
Here you go, side-by-side. Excuse the quality of the quick kitchen table top shot. No time to set up a "studio".


item.JPG



item.JPG



item.JPG





Disclaimer for the old and bitter among us: no robberies, banking scams, capitalisation on the poor and unfortunate have been performed, affiliation with governments bureaucracies established, trust funds used, or anything unethical or morally questionable involved in acquisition of these cameras. In fact besides F3 and the two MF lenses none of them have been really "acquired".

As a side-note: I never fully understood fascination with F3 (partially - yes). Sure, it's a great camera, built like a tank, functions wonderfully, but too small, too awkward to hold. Df feels much better in hand.
 
@Phantomas - thank you for the picture comparisons. Very interesting.

You know, Nikon has demonstrated that they can put EVERYTHING into (onto ?) a camera body. I think the next evolution is to see what the remove to simplify the physical design.

IMO if they completely simplified backside except for the LCD and one push-push-push button to toggle what is shown on it, that would be a very attractive design.
 
I have big hands, F3 is OK for me when I add a grip but then it's huge and heavy.
the smaller cameras like the D60 and D40 are just too small in my hand. I use a D40x regurarly and it works best for me with a grip but then the grip makes the bottom too clumsy.

I think this would fit me good.
Thanks for going to the trouble of doing this.

Kiu
 
The Info button is under the AF joystick. I meant the i button located at the left bottom of the screen.


😱

😀

Having one info button would be very biased, no? But like this you get your info from the left side and from the right side, and make a balanced, informed decision 🙂

Kidding aside, right one gives you simple setting info. Left one let's you actually change the key settings. Don't ask. But I do like my left "I" button, very useful. (When Coolpix A came out that "I" button was my third favourite feature on the camera, after the DX sensor and fixed lens).
 
Just read this: Title of Blog Post:
Nikon Sales Have Fallen, The Nikon DF Is Not In High Demand
from the Phoblographer blog

Snip>>

In what we think is a significant moment, Nikons sales of their interchangeable lens cameras are down by about 14%.
This is in comparison to the same time last year. Demand for Nikon’s compact cameras have fallen about 30%.
This has led to Nikon’s imaging division reporting a 26% loss of income. The worst part of this is Nikon’s overall profits declined 57.5%.
We are not sure what this means for Nikon in the long run, but they have some decisions to make.
Nikon sales forecast has also been cut. The demand of photography hobbyist has fallen.
The Nikon DF may not be the Nikon fans were looking for.

<<Snip

many here have replied with a similar concern that the Df was not the right camera to increase sales..
Many wanted the Df to be more F3 sized.....
Copied from Post 911 (Phantomas)
item.JPG
 
Thanks for the picture, Phantomas.


I truly don't understand what everyone is complaining about.
The Df looks to be a very good camera with manual controls.
Isn't that what we've been waiting for?

Were I to be in a position to buy a digital full frame camera today, I'd never consider the blob on the right. 🙂
 
Frank... as an aside: What the heck do YOU need fast AF for?? Your models never looked like they move around all that much. 😛
- Jamie

You'd be surprised, especially with the smoke bombs and Airsoft guns I've gotten into.

But otherwise, why use a DSLR at all? Their only real advantages are 1. a nice full sized grip and control surfaces for mesomorph hands and 2. better focus tracking and overall speed. My 2007-era Nikon D300 runs circles around the Fujis and m4/3s I've tried. What's wrong with this picture is that it's six years later and Nikon hasn't improved on that, at least with any affordable camera (other than maybe the D4).

If I am stuck with a choice of only using center focus points and a hum-drum AF system (DF or D600) then I might just as well go with a mirrorless camera... put a grip on a Sony or something so it doesn't slip.

I look at the pictures in the galleries and such and most are pretty darn static, which is a shame. Some of this technology is really wonderful in that it really does allow us to track running children or birds in flight and get a stream of well-exposed, in focus photos at ridiculously high ISOs, all of which would be unimaginably back in the film days. Why not use a tool to its best capability? Not saying that the DF needed to be a sports or wildlife camera but I am kind of sick of paying more for less.
 
Back
Top Bottom