Nikon S2 vs Nikon S3?

How does the S3-2000 compare with the S2 or S3? This is all I have for Nikon RF cameras.

Camera Quest has this to say about it: "In February 2000 Nikon surprised the rangefinder world by introducing the S3 2000, a near duplicate of their classic 1958 S3 in chrome finish. In June 2002 the black paint S3 2000 was introduced, with a production of 2000. Nikon discontinued their rangefinder line in 1964. For hardcore Nikon Rangefinder collectors, who had given up on the idea of ever buying a classic new Nikon Rangefinder decades ago, this was a dream come true. So far other classic Nikon Rangefinder bodies and lenses have not been announced by Nikon. Very surprisingly Cosina Voigtlander introduced a trio of multi-coated 21, 25, and 35 wide angles in Nikon rangefinder mount in 2001. Hmm. Maybe the venerable Nikon Rangefinder mount is not dead after all.

Introduced with the S3 was a new formula multicoated 50/1.4 Nikkor lens. It is the only multi-coated normal yet made in Nikon rangefinder mount, and is presumably the sharpest ever, the beneficiary of over four decades of optical improvements. "
 
raid said:
How does the S3-2000 compare with the S2 or S3? This is all I have for Nikon RF cameras.

Camera Quest has this to say about it: "In February 2000 Nikon surprised the rangefinder world by introducing the S3 2000, a near duplicate of their classic 1958 S3 in chrome finish. In June 2002 the black paint S3 2000 was introduced, with a production of 2000. Nikon discontinued their rangefinder line in 1964. For hardcore Nikon Rangefinder collectors, who had given up on the idea of ever buying a classic new Nikon Rangefinder decades ago, this was a dream come true. So far other classic Nikon Rangefinder bodies and lenses have not been announced by Nikon. Very surprisingly Cosina Voigtlander introduced a trio of multi-coated 21, 25, and 35 wide angles in Nikon rangefinder mount in 2001. Hmm. Maybe the venerable Nikon Rangefinder mount is not dead after all.

Introduced with the S3 was a new formula multicoated 50/1.4 Nikkor lens. It is the only multi-coated normal yet made in Nikon rangefinder mount, and is presumably the sharpest ever, the beneficiary of over four decades of optical improvements. "
Click to expand...

Raid, that same site also has this:

https://www.cameraquest.com/NRFS3 2000.htm

The 2000 is a new (now 20 years old new!!) slightly improved S3. In black it is one of the sexiest cameras ever. After my Zenit 212K.
 
raid said:
How does the S3-2000 compare with the S2 or S3?
Click to expand...

Comparing the S3-2000 with the S2 would sound a bit weird, Raid, but if you want my grain of salt when it comes to comparing the S3 made in the late 1950's with the S3-2000, let's say that :

- the original S3 viewfinder may now have a faded RF patch (but it can be cleaned and rejuvenated easily in most cases) but has thinner and more nicely etched 35-50-105 frames (the etched frames in the S3-2000 viewfinder are very Cosina-like),
- the original S3 chrome finish is smoother and nicer (the S3 2000 has a dull and a bit unpleasant chrome finish which reminds me the Nikkormat matte chrome finish),
- the original S3 shutter curtains material ("Habutae silk") is almost undestructible while the S3-2000 shutter curtains fabric may suddenly develop holes which are not sun burnt,
- the general feeling of the original S3 is that of a real Nikon while the S3-2000 rather feels like a replica (not bad, but not as well made : for instance the focusing helicoid is way more pleasant on the orginal S3 than on the S3-2000 even with a bit of liithium grease added between the threads).

The black paint version of the re-issue S3 may be a bit better made than the chrome one - this, I don't know. I have handled one in a shop once, but for too short to tell.

I have owned a S3-2000 (chrome) and re-sold it without many regrets and without having really used it. I had an original S3 which I sold out at a time I was in need of cash and very quickly regretted it although it was not a mint example. A few years later and thanks to some members here I could put my hands on another one, fortunately. Combined with the small and humble yet wonderful black Nikkor-H-C 50mm f/2, this is my daily camera, it's always in my bag even when I only go to the office. It has been with me as my only 24x36 camera for many trips to Italy.
 
Thanks for the link! I oonce bought a S3-2000 set just to get my hands on the 50/1.4 Millenium lens.


Differences between the S3 2000 and the original S3

Classic S3 serial numbers begin with "63xxxx." S3 2000 serial numbers begin with "S3 20xxxx" for chrome bodies and "S3 30xxxx" for black bodies.

The black S3 2000 has a duller paint finish than the original, and does not appear to be sprayed on like the original

Film reminder is "24/36" instead of "20/36"

Film speed reminder is calibrated in "ISO" instead of "ASA"

The baseplate has "MADE IN JAPAN" on the bottom near the tripod socket, instead of "Japan" on the back opening / closing latch.

The back has no patent numbers inside, the original has 6 patent numbers

The film advance lever is Nikon F style, larger and solid, instead of being hollow underneath.

The film counter top is Nikon F style with 6 concentric rings on top, instead of 3

The interior of the PC connection is slightly different

Stainless steel strap lugs larger than original

The knob on the rewind lever is slightly larger

Different boxes and camera cases

There are probably other differences as well, especially internally
 
Highway 61 said:
Comparing the S3-2000 with the S2 would sound a bit weird, Raid, but if you want my grain of salt when it comes to comparing the S3 made in the late 1950's with the S3-2000, let's say that :

- the original S3 viewfinder may now have a faded RF patch (but it can be cleaned and rejuvenated easily in most cases) but has thinner and more nicely etched 35-50-105 frames (the etched frames in the S3-2000 viewfinder are very Cosina-like),
- the original S3 chrome finish is smoother and nicer (the S3 2000 has a dull and a bit unpleasant chrome finish which reminds me the Nikkormat matte chrome finish),
- the original S3 shutter curtains material ("Habutae silk") is almost undestructible while the S3-2000 shutter curtains fabric may suddenly develop holes which are not sun burnt,
- the general feeling of the original S3 is that of a real Nikon while the S3-2000 rather feels like a replica (not bad, but not as well made : for instance the focusing helicoid is way more pleasant on the original S3 than on the S3-2000 even with a bit of lithium grease added between the threads).

The black paint version of the re-issue S3 may be a bit better made than the chrome one - this, I don't know. I have handled one in a shop once, but for too short to tell.

I have owned a S3-2000 (chrome) and re-sold it without many regrets and without having really used it. I had an original S3 which I sold out at a time I was in need of cash and very quickly regretted it although it was not a mint example. A few years later and thanks to some members here I could put my hands on another one, fortunately. Combined with the small and humble yet wonderful black Nikkor-H-C 50mm f/2, this is my daily camera, it's always in my bag even when I only go to the office.
Click to expand...

I bought the set to get the lens. I use an adapter with the lens for Leica M.
I have not once used the camera so far.
 
raid said:
I bought the set to get the lens. I use an adapter with the lens for Leica M.
Click to expand...

The "Millenium Nikkor" is nice but at the end of the day it's too large and too heavy for a 50mm RF lens without any built-in focusing helical. You would be surprised with what the somehow underrated, old and relatively cheap Nikkor-H-C 50mm f/2 can do even by modern standards when compared with the expensive "Millenium Nikkor" (okay it's a f/2 not a f/1.4 but... it is so small and so good).

There used to be test shots to show this here at some point, in a thread by Jonmanjiro.
 
I also use the "old and relatively cheap" Nikkor-H-C 50/2. It is an excellent lens.
Sometimes, we buy stuff because at the time it felt the thing to do. Maybe I did not really need the Millenium 50/1.4.
 
Highway 61 said:
Such a viewfinder has the Canon P, too.

For instance see this and (or versus) that. Old (by the Internet age standards) but still good personal pages.
Click to expand...

Thanks, I was unaware the P was life-size. How much extra is visible outside the frame on the P? The S3 frames are pretty close to the edge of the viewfinder.
 
I have had 3 of the S3-2000s, two chrome and one black. I found them to be superb. I've never owned an original S3, although I've had several SPs, including the SP 2005.

@Highway61's description above is accurate, in my view. Although I don't have first-hand knowledge of curtain differences, I found the handling and feel of the re-issues to be just as good as original Nikon RFs. Never had any problems with the helicals, although @jonmanjiro had several replaced, back in the day. There are probably threads that still exist that mention this...
 
Highway 61 said:
The "Millenium Nikkor" is nice but at the end of the day it's too large and too heavy for a 50mm RF lens without any built-in focusing helical. You would be surprised with what the somehow underrated, old and relatively cheap Nikkor-H-C 50mm f/2 can do even by modern standards when compared with the expensive "Millenium Nikkor" (okay it's a f/2 not a f/1.4 but... it is so small and so good).

There used to be test shots to show this here at some point, in a thread by Jonmanjiro.
Click to expand...


Agreed with regards to the size of the Millenium. Great optic, but I didn't need an f/1.4 lens, so now use a perfect example of the much smaller f/2.
 
splitimageview said:
Thanks, I was unaware the P was life-size. How much extra is visible outside the frame on the P? The S3 frames are pretty close to the edge of the viewfinder.
Click to expand...

The 35mm frame on the Canon P is also tough to see, even without glasses on. The camera has a lot of nice features though, putting it at the top of any LTM-compatible cameras in terms of usability.
 
Not much love here for the separate slow speed selector. It's a bit charming, I think. Represents a different era.
 

Attachments

  • IMAG7105~2.jpg
    IMAG7105~2.jpg
    29 KB · Views: 0
  • IMAG9328-1~2.jpg
    IMAG9328-1~2.jpg
    39.7 KB · Views: 0
  • IMAG9020-1~3.jpg
    IMAG9020-1~3.jpg
    31.8 KB · Views: 0
I agree that the S2 is the better user. I had an S3 and didn't like it very much. The 35mm view is near damn useless even when I'm not wearing glasses you still have to roll your eyes to see the entire frame. Somehow (I guess due to the larger size of the eyepiece) the Canon P is a bit better in this department, but either way I am not a fan of life-size 35mm finders.

I already looked at the thing that I want to photograph in life-size, with my own two eyes before I lift the camera to my face.

If money is no object and you hate external finders I'd recommend a Nikon SP. All the good points of the S3 with an actually usable 35mm finder and a bonus 28mm

Edit: Damn just saw the original thread start-date
 
Hmm. I never had to move my eyeball around to see the 35mm frames using an S3. I don't shoot with glasses, I could see that happening with the eye farther from the eyepiece however.

I used to shoot an M3 with a 35mm lens without an external viewfinder and using the 'roving eyeball' method for framing actually caused eyestrain, it was uncomfortable.
 
When I was considering getting a higher grade of rangefinder than what I had been shooting with, TomA steered me towards the S2. I got a black dial with the 50/2, and really can't find a reason to get any of the other models.

I upgraded the lens though to a 50/1.4 because the f2 was showing separation. However, after doing a test shoot with the f2, I actually didn't need to get the f1.4, but will have it for when the f2 does finally cave in.

PF
 
The S2 is very much like the Nikon F, more than the other Nikon rangefinders.

This one has the Skopar S 50mm mounted, the best 50mm for the Nikon rangefinders.

Erik.

31910190888_1a2a0a16b1_z.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom