Nokton 35/1.2 II + M9 = wow !!

optically very, very close. cool. and if the build quality is on par with v1 then there is nothing left to discuss about here. :D

Simon, you have no place in this discussion, cause your pictures are fine the way they are! :mad:

Bokeh shouldn't even be part of your vocabulary. Your images are always filled with (content) anything but bokeh...and keep it up mate! :D
 
While it's build is nicer than most CV lenses it's identical to the previous version, IMHO.

That's great. So, for once, everybody can be happy. Those that own the V1 will not feel compelled to upgrade. And those that bought the V2 will not feel that they have missed out.
 
I had the VI twice and was very disappointed with this lens...decided to give it a second chance with VII. All I can say is, I am very happy I sold my 35 Lux ASPH and replaced it with this lens. The sharpness wide open even at f/1.2 is simply remarkable...really. The contrast does seem to be better than what I remember. LOCA is extremely well controlled and I would say as good if not better than the 35 Lux ASPH. In addition, flare resistance is also remarkable. I didn't have much time tonight, but I think the few shots below will show the proof as they were tough shots for any lens. All shots below straight out of camera (M9) with NO post processing

First shot wide open with the sun over her left shoulder....notice how well flare is controlled. No adjustments in post to this file. I think LOCA is also very well controlled given the situation

L1000888-XL.jpg


Next shot is also taken wide open (f/1.2) with the sun directly behind her head. Look at how well CAs are controlled....very nice

L1000892-XL.jpg


100% crop - all I can say is WOW!!!!! Remember, NO post processing, no sharpening, NOTHING

L1000892-2-XL.jpg


a shot with the sun behind the head at f/2 showing how it sharpens up nicely

L1000898-XL.jpg


100% crop

L1000898-2-XL.jpg


some crappy pics showing flare....first shot at f/6.7 and second shot at f/4.8

L1000900-XL.jpg


L1000901-XL.jpg


Some infinity shots....first shot at f/2.8 with the 100% crop. Second shot at f/8 with the 100% crop

L1000904-XL.jpg


L1000904-2-XL.jpg


L1000907-XL.jpg


L1000907-2-XL.jpg


All in all I can say that I am more than pleasantly surprised.....I am shocked at how good this lens is. Some of you have had great luck with the VI and were expecting a great lens, but I was not in that boat. The sharpness at f/1.2 is really shocking to me and the bokeh is much nicer than the 35 Lux ASPH IMO. I was always a fan of the 35 Nokton bokeh, but the sharpness wasn't there compared to the 35 Lux ASPH. I think it is now. I would say that it is as sharp if not sharper than the 35 Lux ASPH wide open and clearly sharper stopped down. If you ask me the VII does seem contrastier than VI and just about perfect for how I would like it. If you are considering this lens, BUY IT before he runs out!!!!

Ryan
 
Kristian....I am seeing a big improvement in sharpness and a contrastier lens in VII in the crops you just posted above
 
Hot Damn Leicashot! It definitely looks like the vII is an improvement over the vI. Thanks for posting these images!
 
Guys don't jump the gun yet. There is nothing definitive about the results shown here. We still need brick walls, newspapers and cat pictures to be sure of anything ;)
 
Guys don't jump the gun yet. There is nothing definitive about the results shown here. We still need brick walls, newspapers and cat pictures to be sure of anything ;)

Don't forget the focus charts.. ;)

Thanks a lot for posting all these images, I bet they have made many rffers drool in front of the screen. If it's not to ask a lot, I wonder if you could take a low light shot wide open to show how light balls look like with the V2. The one thing I don't really like about the V1 is its bullseye effect on light balls, and ever since the V2 was announced I got very curious as to how it would render these... something like this:


onion rings by Marcelo Colmenero, on Flickr

Pretty please? :)
 
Guys don't jump the gun yet. There is nothing definitive about the results shown here. We still need brick walls, newspapers and cat pictures to be sure of anything ;)

Sorry, I'm new here. Next time I will post the obligatory brick wall and cat test shots.
 
Don't forget the focus charts.. ;)

Thanks a lot for posting all these images, I bet they have made many rffers drool in front of the screen. If it's not to ask a lot, I wonder if you could take a low light shot wide open to show how light balls look like with the V2. The one thing I don't really like about the V1 is its bullseye effect on light balls, and ever since the V2 was announced I got very curious as to how it would render these... something like this:
onion rings by Marcelo Colmenero, on Flickr

Pretty please? :)

What causes that effect?
 
It's focus now goes down to 0.5M, that's 20cm closer, although the M rangefinder does not couple that close so you'll 'need to remember' this when shooting.
(...)When I want to get close I usually twist the focus ring all the way to 0.7M and line up the rangefinder patch. You can't do it that way with this one, so extra care must be taken.

Can someone embellish a little on this? What happens, or how does it look, in the viewfinder (focus patch) of a trad M when you focus on something at 0.7m and then turn the lens to 0.5m? Is there any room for errors here?
I also incorporate the the same way of getting close as leicashot where I just turn the lens all the way to 0.7 and move forward and backward to get things in focus..
 
In the crop of the leaf the latest version definitely looks sharper to me!
 
What happens? Nothing happens. Once the RF has reached its near limit it stops moving.

So if you focus on something at 0.7 and have that in focus, but keep turning the focus ring on the lens to 0.5 it'll appear in the vf that things are still in focus?
I'm trying to picture how much this will affect me in a real life situation.. Right now it seems as a possible chance of oof subjects..
I am, however, very drawn to the fact that v2 is sharper...
Hmm.. one thing I'm certain of, I will be getting one of these babies for sure.
 
Last edited:
Guys don't jump the gun yet. There is nothing definitive about the results shown here. We still need brick walls, newspapers and cat pictures to be sure of anything ;)

The hot damn was directed more at your extensive post! ;)

I think I may wait on upgrading. I recently got distracted by a 90/2 that I am borrowing from a friend...

I'm looking forward to seeing more images from the vII!
 
Wobba,

Thanks for taking the time to make these tests available to us. But if you have distortion-corrected them in LR afterwards; what kind of lens test is it then? Further; an issue with the M9 and non Leica lenses are the 'Italian flag' issue, typical with non Leica fast lenses/wide angles. Have you corrected for the Italian Flag too?

Please note that all lenses have a focus shift. Due to physical laws. But they can only be seen on very fast lenses.
 
Back
Top Bottom