Not bad - not especially good.
Feet are hard to photograph. They often look unattractive and the soles of feet more so. Best concealed or made less obvious.
The model looks uncomfortable - not relaxed. It's not a natural pose. I think that's always a test - is the pose one that the model might easily adopt if clothed and not being set up for a photograph? Nude shots for some reason often use exaggerated poses that don't look natural or comfortable. Some look like contortionists - is it "art"?
Another factor is the awkward placing of the chair in the corner, (I mean, what the heck is she doing there?) and the tile background does nothing to improve the situation. The variation in lighting on the back is, I think, partly a result of natural tanning but more so the effect of the light setup reflecting back from the skin surface closest and most nearly parallel to the film plane.
Bum crack? Yes, a little more side-on might have overcome that issue.
All in all it's a shot that would probably bear trying again, but those workshops are notoriously difficult to operate in with other photographers trying to get "their shot". I've stopped going to them as I was never very pleased with the results and to hire a model and studio on my own was too expensive to consider.
I think the chair is actually a very good 'prop' and it would be worth trying to do the shot again with a plain background, a two-source light setup and also try some different poses using the chair. Maybe shoot a little more from the side rather than the flat-on back view. And watch those feet!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.