One camera, one lens, one film

Hmmm…having just bought a Mamiya 6.

But I'd take the Leitz M6 Classic and Nikkor 35/2.5 ( Amedeo adapted ) and I guess Ilford XP2.
 
keep them coming, one camera one lens, one film doesn't just have to be down a bunker, you might want to escape the disaster up a mountain or indeed on a desert island, y choice would be an island off the coast of Scotland or Northumberland...a camera that could handle cold would be good
 
Canon L1 with 12mm Ultra Wide-Heliar

Canon L1 with 12mm Ultra Wide-Heliar

U776I1474482159.SEQ.0.jpg


Assuming the bunker's rather small I'd choose the 12mm Ultra Wide-Heliar mounted on my 1957 Canon L1. It's probably going to be dark in there so my film is Tri-X, rated at 1600 and developed in stock D76 for 11 minutes at 20C.

PS. Just read the post above. I'd stick with this combo anyway as islands off the coast can also be dark and damp and the Canon L1 can handle anything.
 
Assuming the bunker's rather small I'd choose the 12mm Ultra Wide-Heliar mounted on my 1957 Canon L1. It's probably going to be dark in there so my film is Tri-X, rated at 1600 and developed in stock D76 for 11 minutes at 20C.

PS. Just read the post above. I'd stick with this combo anyway as islands off the coast can also be dark and damp and the Canon L1 can handle anything.

good choice😎
 
I would love to say Leica, lenses are the best, bodies are high maintenance.

Nikon digital lenses remain to be seen long term, manual focus are decent, lub seems to last forever, they don`t fog up, both of which are against Leica old lenses, new ones seem not to have these defects.

I have bought two Nikon F2 recently, gently used, they work no issues. 1978 models. Numerous digital ones and no issues.

Film or digital. After "disaster," can we process film and get prints. How about electricity to charge batteries.

Let me assume I am saving kit from a fire. I would grab the bag with my Leica.

Nuclear war, would not bother with any camera at all. Just food, first aid kit, a something to protect me and the first two from villains. I don`t know how to protect from world wide radiation or WMD. We will mostly all perish sooner or later.
 
5822278575_4042fb93f3_b.jpg
[/url]F840 #3 My "Walk about" kit by T&T and Mr B Abrahamsson, on Flickr[/IMG]

Decided to change my preference! Leica M2 and the Nokton 40mm f1.4 - either SC or MC. It can save as a 50 if you step closer - or a 35 it you back off 1/2 step. Sharp wide open - which could be an advantage in the post apocalyptic state. Still Kodak Double X and still IXMOO cassettes. Each can of 400 ft XX would give me 70-72 rolls - so three cans would be 200+rolls. Developer probably Td 201 + chemicals to replenish, liquid fix and a pair of good scissors. I am less worried about nuclear strikes etc - but we live in an earthquake zone.
 
I would love to say Leica, lenses are the best, bodies are high maintenance.

Nikon digital lenses remain to be seen long term, manual focus are decent, lub seems to last forever, they don`t fog up, both of which are against Leica old lenses, new ones seem not to have these defects.

I have bought two Nikon F2 recently, gently used, they work no issues. 1978 models. Numerous digital ones and no issues.

Film or digital. After "disaster," can we process film and get prints. How about electricity to charge batteries.

Let me assume I am saving kit from a fire. I would grab the bag with my Leica.

Nuclear war, would not bother with any camera at all. Just food, first aid kit, a something to protect me and the first two from villains. I don`t know how to protect from world wide radiation or WMD. We will mostly all perish sooner or later.

great answer
 
5822278575_4042fb93f3_b.jpg
[/url]F840 #3 My "Walk about" kit by T&T and Mr B Abrahamsson, on Flickr[/IMG]

Decided to change my preference! Leica M2 and the Nokton 40mm f1.4 - either SC or MC. It can save as a 50 if you step closer - or a 35 it you back off 1/2 step. Sharp wide open - which could be an advantage in the post apocalyptic state. Still Kodak Double X and still IXMOO cassettes. Each can of 400 ft XX would give me 70-72 rolls - so three cans would be 200+rolls. Developer probably Td 201 + chemicals to replenish, liquid fix and a pair of good scissors. I am less worried about nuclear strikes etc - but we live in an earthquake zone.

earthquake zone sounds very scary, the only danger l face round here is the odd wasp on the bus on the way to work😱 your M2 looks way too cool, love it
 
I considered a Nikon F.

A Rolleiflex is also tempting.

In the end, I would grab my little, overhauled, Jsolette folder with the Prontor shutter and as much TriX as I could pack.

The little Isolette is low tech enough that even I can repair it, but it still takes great photographs that do not necessarily need enlarging.

And, if all else fails, I'll turn it into a pinhole camera.

If this is long term it isn't the camera that is the potential problem, it is the film, paper and chemicals.

Or the Zombies.
 
I would love to say Leica, lenses are the best, bodies are high maintenance. . . .
Really? I've had (I think) two M repairs spread across 40+ years of owning M-series Leicas: I currently have M2-M4P-MP-M8-M9, and I've owned other M-series. The M9 is about to add another repair. But one per decade doesn't strike me as "high maintenance", and one of those was the result of rough handling from a cretin at security in LAX. Are you speaking from experience?

Cheers,

R.
 
Back
Top Bottom