One of my main reasons for liking film

Ted ... your link's not working for me ... or was that the effect you're refering to?

If so my M8 can match that occasionally! :p

[edit] ... ah, now it's working!
 
Last edited:
Still a favorite of mine, from the first roll I ever tried to develop.

2471028242_a1cde3d69f.jpg
 
ampguy said:
remember, I'm a purist, no photoshop for me. Just occasional Picasa :D
Click to expand...

That's sort of a strange attitude. Part of the whole point of digital is being able to easily manipulate it on a computer.

But if enough people really wanted that effect, it would be programmed to be available in-camera, in any of 255 shades of color, on any edge (or multiple edges) of the frame.

I guess I do get your point (sort of) about the fact that film errors and artifacts of process have to be simulated in the digital realm. Indeed, taking a "film" approach to digital information is one of the things Photoshop excels at.
 
russianRF said:
That's sort of a strange attitude. Part of the whole point of digital is being able to easily manipulate it on a computer.

But if enough people really wanted that effect, it would be programmed to be available in-camera, in any of 255 shades of color, on any edge (or multiple edges) of the frame.

I guess I do get your point (sort of) about the fact that film errors and artifacts of process have to be simulated in the digital realm. Indeed, taking a "film" approach to digital information is one of the things Photoshop excels at.
Click to expand...

Welll, I think it's all a very tongue in cheek approach. Are you good at that too? I hope so. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom