overexposed Reala 100

Peter_S

Peter_S
Local time
1:51 PM
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
886
Location
Trondheim (Norway); Tbilisi (Georgia)
Hi!
Yesterday I shot away happily with my Contax T and forgot to watch the meter...it was a sunny day and f/2.8 and 1/500 overexposed my Reala 100. Checking my lightmeter (too late)...ISO 64 at the same settings should have been the maximum here. Oups.

What now? Tell to store to pull the film or just have it developed normally?
 
Over exposing color negatives can produce intense high contrast colors. I over expose Ektar 100 to get the color the film deserves.
Develop normally and you might be surprised.

Leica M3, Summicron 90/2, Ektar 100 over exposed 1/2 stop
2014-06-02_09-21-25.jpg
 
Hi!
Yesterday I shot away happily with my Contax T and forgot to watch the meter...it was a sunny day and f/2.8 and 1/500 overexposed my Reala 100. Checking my lightmeter (too late)...ISO 64 at the same settings should have been the maximum here. Oups.

What now? Tell to store to pull the film or just have it developed normally?
Dear Peter,

With colour negative films, 1/3 stop is trivial. Many overexpose by at least that much as a matter of course.

Cheers,

R.
 
1/3 of a stop certainly won't be a problem, presuming that the Reala is approaching it's expiry date it might even do some good.

I always over expose film that's past it's date.

For future reference the Wiki page for DX coding shows you how to read what the over/under exposure latitude of your film will be

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DX_encoding
 
How old that Reala is, if it's not fresh then some overexposure is what is screams for. I have matured Reala which has bluish tint and looks bad if shot at box speed.
 
I've just had a roll of Reala bought in 2006/7 developed - fridged most of the time, but at room temperature in a camera for about eight months - and it was fine. I'd link to a scan, but my scanning efforts aren't up to the pro's gorgeous prints! 2012 is nothing to worry about either.

Adrian
 
Back
Top Bottom