JeffS7444
Well-known
I own a Horizon S3: The weight isn't bad, and as others have mentioned, the finder (with bubble level) is good. I'd expect it to be pretty reliable.
Looks like prices for the Xpan / TX1 are very high right now. Have you considered the alternative of a Mamiya 6 MF + 35mm film adapter? That's a super camera in it's own right.
Looks like prices for the Xpan / TX1 are very high right now. Have you considered the alternative of a Mamiya 6 MF + 35mm film adapter? That's a super camera in it's own right.
dourbalistar
Buy more film
Pali (posts as Netsoft2k here on RFF) makes 3D printed cameras. I think he's made cameras for other members here - not sure if that's who Corran is referring to:
https://6x14.netsoft2k.com/
https://6x14.netsoft2k.com/
filmtwit
Desperate but not serious
Noblex 150
Dale D
Member
Colton, I've been interested in the Bronica w/35mm pano back for a while. Seems like a decent, low cost way to get into panoramic. How easy is it to find the pano backs? I see a lot of ETRSi's for sale, but have never seen that back for sale.
Great shot of a great car, by the way. 442's were sweet.
Dale
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
More about cropping the pano image out of the 35mm frame: I use my Nikon SLRs for this. I take the focusing screen out of the camera, and with it on a lightbox, I draw pencil lines on it to mark my safe framing area. I use a 2:1 ratio, but you can use any ratio you like. I use a plastic C-Thru ruler with millimeter scale that won't scratch the screen to measure and to guide the pencil.
Swift1
Veteran
If the OP is wanting an Xpan and is considering getting a Horizon (or similar), I think it's important to point out that while the 2 are panoramic, they couldn't be more different.
The way that a swing lens camera (Horizon, Widelux) works is very different from the typical rectalinear camera. They definitely have their benefits, but it takes quite a bit to start "seeing" in the way that a swing lens camera sees.
The way that a swing lens camera (Horizon, Widelux) works is very different from the typical rectalinear camera. They definitely have their benefits, but it takes quite a bit to start "seeing" in the way that a swing lens camera sees.
Corran
Well-known
Pali (posts as Netsoft2k here on RFF) makes 3D printed cameras. I think he's made cameras for other members here - not sure if that's who Corran is referring to:
https://6x14.netsoft2k.com/
Yep that's the camera I use and would recommend. Mine is the 6x15 model.
aizan
Veteran
Before I got the Moment anamorphic lens, I was seriously considering a panoramic mask with 35mm adapter for the Pentax 67. I would have gotten a 45mm lens for it.
Swift1
Veteran
Colton, I've been interested in the Bronica w/35mm pano back for a while. Seems like a decent, low cost way to get into panoramic. How easy is it to find the pano backs? I see a lot of ETRSi's for sale, but have never seen that back for sale.
Great shot of a great car, by the way. 442's were sweet.
Dale
I see the 135W back for the ETR system quite often on ebay. I think there is one on ebay right now. There aren't inexpensive, but still a bargain compared to an Xpan
retinax
Well-known
If the OP is wanting an Xpan and is considering getting a Horizon (or similar), I think it's important to point out that while the 2 are panoramic, they couldn't be more different.
The way that a swing lens camera (Horizon, Widelux) works is very different from the typical rectalinear camera. They definitely have their benefits, but it takes quite a bit to start "seeing" in the way that a swing lens camera sees.
Major advantage of the swing lens: doesn't distort heads toward the edges of the frame, better for panoramas with people.
Swift1
Veteran
Major advantage of the swing lens: doesn't distort heads toward the edges of the frame, better for panoramas with people.
Yes, but they tend to distort everything else
retinax
Well-known
Yes, but they tend to distort everything else![]()
No free lunch
Jerevan
Recycled User
Thank you for all your suggestions! I am at the moment ruling out the swing lens panorama cameras, and will look into having something built. Thinking of going with a 90 mm on 6x12.
First off, I'll get a lens and see if it works for me with on the 4x5 I already have, with a converted filmholder.
First off, I'll get a lens and see if it works for me with on the 4x5 I already have, with a converted filmholder.
otveit
Newbie
I see the 135W back for the ETR system quite often on ebay. I think there is one on ebay right now. There aren't inexpensive, but still a bargain compared to an Xpan![]()
Does anyone know if this back could be used without a camera? Could be interesting for a diy scale or fixed focus camera
shawn
Veteran
A cheaper (and wider) way of doing something like that would be with a Mamiya Universal 6x9 back. The automatic back will properly advance 35mm film as it uses a separate roller to measure the films movement and 35mm will properly rotate that roller. You would probably have to unload it in a changing bag but as far as film advance it works fine with 120 to 35mm adapters.
Shawn
Shawn
snaefell
Established
i was in the same boat as you a few years ago. I kept my eyes and ears open. then 1 day a great fuji g617 came available for a great price and i jumped on it. if your patient you can find what you are looking for. the huge MF shot is far better than any 35mm pano shot. you can get a fuji g617 cheaper than an XPAN. the fuji is built like a tank and has no electric parts, so reliability and repairabilty should be much better than an Xpan
True, I have used the Fuji of a fried and it's a nice camera. I eventually got myself a Gaoersi 6x17 which is much cheaper and is still a fine camera. Mine can also be used as 6x15 and 6x12. Only downside: This camera is huge an heavy. But this is something which applies to all medium format panorama cameras.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.