Pentax 67 Gas!

[dourbalistar]

A little swirly, a little nervous... the bokeh I mean. 😉

Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 90mm f/2.8 LS, Fujifilm Fujicolor Pro 400H, expired in 2008, at E.I. 100.


2018.06.22 Roll #166-69870010.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr

 

[ASA 32]

77790003
by ASA 32,
on Flickr

Tucker
Pentax 67, Pentax 105mm f/2.4, Ilford Delta 400

 

[dourbalistar]

77790003
by ASA 32,
on Flickr

Tucker
Pentax 67, Pentax 105mm f/2.4, Ilford Delta 400

Beautiful pup portrait! 🙂

 

[dourbalistar]

Mercedes-Benz G-Wagen

Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 105mm f/2.4, Kodak Ektar 100.


2018.11.10 Roll #188-69900004.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr

 

[chasfreeland]

I'm set to purchase a Pentax 67 with 100mm macro lens + attachment. A package deal. If've been browsing through this forum, but find little or nothing about the 100mm macro. Anyone have it or has used it? Internet forums claim it's slightly sharper than the 105 f2.8, nor is it quite as heavy as the 105. I tried the lens in the shop; it is capable of very close focus, 1/2 life-size, but with the attachment, it's 1:1. Also: anyone have the 55 to 100 mm f4.5 zoom? That's supposed to be very good and would save on having to carrying two or three primes. Any comments? Thanks very much in advance.

 

[leicapixie]

I thought the Macro lens was "135mm" ?
I used it as my normal, plus the 75mm.
Used friends 55mm, all were stunning.

 

[johannielscom]

There is a 100mm macro, Pixie.

See here: https://www.johanniels.com/en/medium-format/153-pentax-67-lenses

 

[charjohncarter]

105 f4 wide open, expired Portra 160:

Portra 160 Expired (very) by John Carter, on Flickr

 

[Brad Bireley]

75mm f/4.5
Agfapan APX 100
Asaph Wild Area
Tioga State Forest, PA

 

[lcpr]

I'm set to purchase a Pentax 67 with 100mm macro lens + attachment. A package deal. If've been browsing through this forum, but find little or nothing about the 100mm macro. Anyone have it or has used it? Internet forums claim it's slightly sharper than the 105 f2.8, nor is it quite as heavy as the 105. I tried the lens in the shop; it is capable of very close focus, 1/2 life-size, but with the attachment, it's 1:1. Also: anyone have the 55 to 100 mm f4.5 zoom? That's supposed to be very good and would save on having to carrying two or three primes. Any comments? Thanks very much in advance.

I have the 55-100 zoom and it's a great lens, just as sharp as the equivalent primes and it focuses closer than the 105mm. Just very heavy, so while you you have a lighter bag weight compared to three primes your actual setup weight that you'll hanging off your neck/shoulder will be higher. I tend to use the primes more often as a result of that but the zoom has its place.

 

[chasfreeland]

Thanks, icpr. I was expecting the zoom to be heavy, and therefore not the best travel lens. Probably will stick to the smaller primes.

 

[Doug]

I have the 100 f/4 macro, one of the last lenses introduced for the P67 system. Lovely lens all-round. Here are a couple of shots with it...

 

[Doug]

I also have the 55-100mm f/4.5 zoom, very crisp for a zoom, and weighs a ton! Well, that would be 1210 grams... 🙂

 

[Abbazz]

I'm set to purchase a Pentax 67 with 100mm macro lens + attachment. A package deal. If've been browsing through this forum, but find little or nothing about the 100mm macro. Anyone have it or has used it? Internet forums claim it's slightly sharper than the 105 f2.8, nor is it quite as heavy as the 105. I tried the lens in the shop; it is capable of very close focus, 1/2 life-size, but with the attachment, it's 1:1.

Ctein loves it: TheOnlinePhotographer

Cheers!

Abbazz

 

[dourbalistar]

Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 105mm f/2.4, Kodak Ektar 100.


2018.11.10 Roll #188-69900002.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr

 

[dourbalistar]

Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 105mm f/2.4, Kodak 400TX, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 6 minutes.


2018.09.15 Roll #181-02953-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr

 

[Raskolnikov]

Untitled by t1m.h, on Flickr

The 55-100mm is awesome. Very sharp, versatile and close focus down to 0,6m. Yes, it’s heavy, but you don’t use the P67 for it’s light weight. 600 gr extra vs the 105mm isn’t be a deal breaker IMO.

 

[Creagerj]

Shot with the 45mm f/4 and tri-x. More shots from the same lens here and here.

 

[Raskolnikov]

Two more with the 55-100mm. Lugging this beast around Bologna for a few days, in the Mediterranean heat, was pretty tiring. But the negs make it all worthwhile.

Untitled
by t1m.h, on Flickr

Untitled
by t1m.h, on Flickr

 

[dourbalistar]

Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 105mm f/2.4, Ilford HP5+, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2018.09.29 Roll #184-02987-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr