dourbalistar
Buy more film
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 90mm f/2.8 LS, Kodak 400TX at E.I. 200, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.

2018.07.04 Roll #170-02683-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr

2018.07.04 Roll #170-02683-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Photon42
burn the box
I agree with charjohncarter. The color and tonality on this portrait is splendid. Bravo!
Thanks, guys.
dourbalistar
Buy more film
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 105mm f/2.4, Kodak 400TX, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 6 minutes.

2018.09.15 Roll #181-02962-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr

2018.09.15 Roll #181-02962-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
aizan
Veteran
Waiting patiently for a 300mm f/4 non-ED. The examples of bokeh on Flickr are soft as buttah. 
Abbazz
6x9 and be there!
There is one in Excellent+ condition available from Keh.com. I don't know what do you want to use the lens for but it's not the best candidate for portrait work because of its rather long 5m minimum focus. And the dedicated close-up lenses are rare as hens' teeth..Waiting patiently for a 300mm f/4 non-ED. The examples of bokeh on Flickr are soft as buttah.![]()
Cheers!
Abbazz
aizan
Veteran
I got the other lens they had w/o case. 
Yes, I'm going to do portraits. They have dedicated close-up lenses? I was just going to get a set of extension tubes and see which one worked.
Yes, I'm going to do portraits. They have dedicated close-up lenses? I was just going to get a set of extension tubes and see which one worked.
dourbalistar
Buy more film
American LaFrance, 900 Series.
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 90mm f/2.8 LS, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.

2018.09.01 Roll #178-02816-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 90mm f/2.8 LS, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.

2018.09.01 Roll #178-02816-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Abbazz
6x9 and be there!
Sorry for the delay but I just saw your post.I got the other lens they had w/o case.
Yes, I'm going to do portraits. They have dedicated close-up lenses? I was just going to get a set of extension tubes and see which one worked.
Congratulations on the acquisition. For portraits, using a dedicated close-up lens is much easier than using extension tubes:
- A close-up lens does not require exposure correction, whereas extension tubes "absorb" light and require a longer exposure / faster aperture.
- Extension tubes need the lens to be removed first before being installed, while close-up lenses just screw on the front filter thread of the lens.
- Extension tubes are much bulkier than close-up lenses.
The only problem is that the T226 is not made anymore and its lucky owners don't want to part with their precious possession...
Cheers!
Abbazz
aizan
Veteran
The only problem is that the T226 is not made anymore and its lucky owners don't want to part with their precious possession...
It doesn't look like anyone else made a 67mm .44x diopter, either! So much for that. :bang:
DKimg
Established
Photon42
burn the box
Very nice. Can I ask: how did you successfully pair the 2/110 (Hassy mount?) with the 67?
DKimg
Established
Very nice. Can I ask: how did you successfully pair the 2/110 (Hassy mount?) with the 67?
The lens was previously converted to a PL mount so I took that off and tried to make my own mount from adapters. After realizing I couldn't get it slim enough so it can focus to infinity, I outsourced it to have someone recreate a new custom rear mount so it can focus properly. Other than changing the bodies mount, there's no quick DIY and/or adapter to use hassy lenses on pentax bodies.
dourbalistar
Buy more film
The lens was previously converted to a OK mount so I took that off and tried to make my own mount from adapters. After realizing I couldn't get it slim enough so it can focus to infinity, I outsourced it to have someone recreate a new custom rear mount so it can focus properly. Other than changing the bodies mount, there's no quick DIY and/or adapter to use hassy lenses on pentax bodies.
Interesting! Have you heard about The Bokeh Factory? Seems they do some custom lens mount conversions, including for Pentax 6x7.
Photon42
burn the box
The lens was previously converted to a OK mount so I took that off and tried to make my own mount from adapters. After realizing I couldn't get it slim enough so it can focus to infinity, I outsourced it to have someone recreate a new custom rear mount so it can focus properly. Other than changing the bodies mount, there's no quick DIY and/or adapter to use hassy lenses on pentax bodies.
Thanks for the insights. Very interesting. What is an OK mount?
DKimg
Established
Thanks for the insights. Very interesting. What is an OK mount?
Ops, I meant a PL mount. Used for a Cine Camera.
Interesting! Have you heard about The Bokeh Factory? Seems they do some custom lens mount conversions, including for Pentax 6x7.
Yes I have heard of them. At the time they were trying to convert the planar 80 f2 Contax lens and didn't work out. I've reached out to them for some help and resources and wasn't to their best interest to convert it.
Swift1
Veteran
jordan.dickinson
Jordan Dickinson
I got trapped by this thread and now own a Pentax 67 MLU w/90mm f2.8. I really want to get the 45mm f4 and a 105 f2.4 (just because of the reputation and images I've seen). I REALLY did not need another system, but these images and me missing my old Mamiya 7ii brought me back. Heading to Moab in a few weeks, so that might be the perfect time to try it out.
aizan
Veteran
The 105mm strikes me as meh. Wide open at medium distances makes pretty harsh bokeh. I’d recommend the 75mm f/2.8.
Scapevision
Well-known
The 105mm strikes me as meh. Wide open at medium distances makes pretty harsh bokeh. I’d recommend the 75mm f/2.8.
that's 'cause you're using it wrong
aizan
Veteran
that's just regular lens behavior. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
if a lens makes harsh bokeh wide open, it'll smoothen out if you stop down 2 stops.
the 75mm f/2.8 doesn't have that problem. on the longer end of things, the 150mm f/2.8 is really good, too.
if a lens makes harsh bokeh wide open, it'll smoothen out if you stop down 2 stops.
the 75mm f/2.8 doesn't have that problem. on the longer end of things, the 150mm f/2.8 is really good, too.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.