stewmander
Established
Just found an interesting article in Popular Mechanics about photographing public places...
http://www.popularmechanics.com/tec...in-public-places-is-not-a-crime?click=main_sr
http://www.popularmechanics.com/tec...in-public-places-is-not-a-crime?click=main_sr
migtex
Don't eXchange Freedom!
you may wanna look at this magazine site.
www.polkamagazine.com
quite interesting work on NYC finest.
www.polkamagazine.com
quite interesting work on NYC finest.
marcr1230
Well-known
A rough translation of the opening page of the article is that since Sept 11 and with this year's attempted Times Square bombing. Police in NYC have come to view photography as sort of a "public enemy"
http://www.polkamagazine.com/lecture/Polka_Magazine_9
http://www.polkamagazine.com/lecture/Polka_Magazine_9
stewmander
Established
Its a bit unfortunate that the police and security professionals that are on the front lines are so focused on ALL photography that they may actually be missing the "real terrorists" (who according to the Popular Mechanics article, do not use photography as part of their prep work for an attack). I liked the idea of more cameras in the hands of more people will make public areas SAFER and not the opposite.
Juan Valdenebro
Truth is beauty
Its a bit unfortunate that the police and security professionals that are on the front lines are so focused on ALL photography that they may actually be missing the "real terrorists" (who according to the Popular Mechanics article, do not use photography as part of their prep work for an attack). I liked the idea of more cameras in the hands of more people will make public areas SAFER and not the opposite.
That makes sense, and could help as a future argument for our freedom as photographers...
Cheers,
Juan
user237428934
User deletion pending
Reading this I was a little bit surprised. It sounds like the police can enforce an own interpretation of the law in the US. That's what normally happens in 3rd world countries or dictatorships I thought.
user237428934
User deletion pending
I liked the idea of more cameras in the hands of more people will make public areas SAFER and not the opposite.
If this leads to everybody is photographing everbody, I can't see that it makes things safer. Many people don't feel comfortable when they are being photographed in public. Many people in that mood don't make a safe and friendly environment.
Pickett Wilson
Veteran
Many people don't even like being looked at in public. Welcome to the 21st. Century.
Juan Valdenebro
Truth is beauty
I really think in some decades laws will be tough for photographers, all around the world...
Cheers,
Juan
Cheers,
Juan
David Murphy
Veteran
In 1972 I was filming (in 8mm) the police hassling a bunch of teenagers who where simply swimming in a local canal and bothering no one (a common and harmless activity then). This was in suburban Miami. The police told me to turn off the camera or be arrested. The cops in those days would often beat you within in inch of your life if they got you in jail so I capitulated. Today I'd probably stand my ground, but I was just 16 then!
stewmander
Established
I dont think people will be going around photographing everyone all the time in public places...I am just thinking that taking photos of buildings, streets, cars, etc. in everyday public places increases the odds that perhaps you will catch a suspecious character lurking about, or even in the act of a crime. The photo can then be used to identify, catch, or prevent a terrorist act. Like the article said, often times police ask the public to provide any information about a suspect, including any photos taken that might be valuable in finding the suspect or placing him at the scene of a crime.
btgc
Veteran
I gon't even get started on this.
Picket Wilson expressed trends well.
Picket Wilson expressed trends well.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.