fstop
Lurker
Could anyone recommend a polarizing filter for the 35 Summilux ASPH which allows the hood to be mounted? I got a B+W linear polarizer, but it is too thick.
Thanks.
Thanks.
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
The original Leica one comes with hood and swings 180 degrees to let you judge the effect in the viewfinder. Any other type is virtually unusable as you can't look through the lens prior to shooting.
fstop
Lurker
I use a second polarizer to preview the scene, then try to align the lens-mounted polarizer the same way. I know it's crude, but it works.
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
As far as I know nor Schneider, Heliopan nor B+W make slimline 46 mm filters....
Should you buy any, remember that Heliopan has an engraved scale on the side of the filter,making your method just that little bit easier.
Should you buy any, remember that Heliopan has an engraved scale on the side of the filter,making your method just that little bit easier.
Last edited:
Steve Hoffman
Leicanutt
You could get a real Leica unit; they still make them. It hooks to a 46mm or 39mm Leica M lens and a part swings over the viewfinder and back again. A nifty device but probably expensive.
N
Nikon Bob
Guest
A friend of mine oriented the polarizer in front of his eye and the just held it in that position front of the lens for the shot. Works for tripoded shots but probably a bear handheld. There really seems to be no easy way to use poloarizers or graduated ND filters on a RF. The swingout Leica solution is cumbersome and expensive. The solution for ease of use of these filters is likely an SLR.
Bob
Bob
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
There is a simple one: Use a step-up ring for a -say- 55 mm filter and grind a slit in the rim just in view of the viewfinder. You can see exactly what is happening to the filter through this slit.
N
Nikon Bob
Guest
Jaap
A very good thought and if you are not into homebrewed solutions here is a more expensive alternative http://www.konermann.net/steps.html . I still like your idea better.
Bob
A very good thought and if you are not into homebrewed solutions here is a more expensive alternative http://www.konermann.net/steps.html . I still like your idea better.
Bob
waileong
Well-known
Tough luck
Tough luck
You'll have to shell out big bucks for a slim polarizer-- if they exist in 46 mm. But if you use a step up ring, it acts like a hood once the thick polarizer is mounted, so there is no need for the hood.
Tough luck
You'll have to shell out big bucks for a slim polarizer-- if they exist in 46 mm. But if you use a step up ring, it acts like a hood once the thick polarizer is mounted, so there is no need for the hood.
fstop said:Could anyone recommend a polarizing filter for the 35 Summilux ASPH which allows the hood to be mounted? I got a B+W linear polarizer, but it is too thick.
Thanks.
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
Nikon Bob said:Jaap
A very good thought and if you are not into homebrewed solutions here is a more expensive alternative http://www.konermann.net/steps.html . I still like your idea better.
Bob
At any rate a lot cheaper....
N
Nikon Bob
Guest
Yeah, cheaper is good.
Bob
Bob
Steve Hoffman
Leicanutt
Do a little checking around. I found this new demo for under $150.00. It works great!
fstop
Lurker
Thanks for all the suggestions, guys. Looks as if I'll have to do without the hood when I use the polarizer. Might give jaapv's and waileong's methods a go.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.