back alley
IMAGES
if anyone cares to look...this thread was started in 2004!
i wish we had termination dates for threads sometimes.
i wish we had termination dates for threads sometimes.
back alley said:if anyone cares to look...this thread was started in 2004!
i wish we had termination dates for threads sometimes.
#FT2_8*fffg. said:Think what you like. I just think this is the kind of rotten bourgeoisie thing that's been killing the art for a long time with it's own set of pretensions. I hardly post here because it's ridden with it. Not that I'm a vile misanthrope. Crappy materialism bothers me, not people. .
...I see. Well, of course, this is just the sort of blinkered philistine pig-ignorance I've come to expect from you non-creative garbage. You sit there on your loathsome spotty behinds squeezing blackheads, not caring a tinker's cuss for the struggling artist. You excrement, you whining hypocritical toadies with your colour TV sets and your Tony Jacklin golf clubs and your bleeding masonic secret handshakes.
#FT2_8*fffg. said:I do shoot a Leica. It makes me uncomforatable. Very uncomfortable. I have the urge to go throw it off a very tall building.
Bertram2 said:😕 These 8 votes are absolutely amazing, there must be a colossal lack of information here about what history and which products are behind the name of Zeiss .
Seems Zeiss was and still is more an European "Ikon(e)" ? 😉
bertram
copake_ham said:Betram,
My magazines tell me that Cosina now licenses the Zeiss name for their cameras.
Bertram2 said:As I said : An amazing lack of information. 😛 Cosina does NOT license the Zeiss name for their products. And this was said 100 times already :bang: , here and elsewhere, in threads 3 miles and 20.000 views long .
Anyway, this Quatsch seems to be too well suited for a certain kinda anti- ZI propaganda to let some folks accept that it is simply wrong, even wronger than the "rebranded Cossie" crap.
I am a bit surprised that it is you who tries to revive that moldy body ? Thought it was buried already in some closed threads.
Regards,
bertram
copake_ham said:Betram,
I was only joking! 😀
.
Bertram2 said:As I said : An amazing lack of information. 😛 Cosina does NOT license the Zeiss name for their products. And this was said 100 times already :bang: , here and elsewhere, in threads 3 miles and 20.000 views long .
Anyway, this Quatsch seems to be too well suited for a certain kinda anti- ZI propaganda to let some folks accept that it is simply wrong, even wronger than the "rebranded Cossie" crap.
I am a bit surprised that it is you who tries to revive that moldy body ? Thought it was buried already in some closed threads.
Regards,
bertram
#FT2_8*fffg. said:Kmack is right, it was a silly rant (and partially meant to be)
Hence the ending. But I deleted it anyway, because I realize it's mostly bitter anger at collectors who've driven the prices to on everything. It is a well known fact the going rate of a Yashica Electro G is around 2,700,000 dollars, wheras it was about $10 a year ago. Coincidence? I think not. Clearly idle rich people loathing around and keeping thousands of cameras in closets are driving the prices up for all of us.
BTW, I would like to see more apartment buildings designed with serated blades and a completely modernized removal of blood from the tenants whose remains are wisked away into their cozy apartments. Of course I thought that was a great design.
You're alright, Kmack. And, Todd, I do shoot a Leica. It makes me uncomforatable. Very uncomfortable. I have the urge to go throw it off a very tall building.
OK, we get it, Honu. The record's kind of scratched.Honu-Hugger said:As for tossing the Leica; don't let me stop you 😀. Just get a picture of it going down to share with the rest of us.
"...idle rich people loathing around and keeping thousands of cameras in closets..." now that's really funny stuff. I like a market economy -- it works.