Post Bronica Photos... Any format. I just want to see Bronica photos

Nice. Colton, I think you see more antique cars in each week than I've seen in my 10 years in Charlotte. Why is Oregon so full of them? (Or do you just know where to look?)

--Dave
 
Argenticien said:
Nice. Colton, I think you see more antique cars in each week than I've seen in my 10 years in Charlotte. Why is Oregon so full of them? (Or do you just know where to look?)

--Dave
Click to expand...

Thanks Dave.
There are quite a few old cars and trucks around here. I've photographed some of them more than a few times too :)
 
Indeed I like the look from that 80. It has handled a very busy foliage background pretty well in that Hilux shot. But I'm not sure I would find it so much better than the usual Nikkor 75 that I'd be willing to spend $200(?) for one.

I notice the Toyota has a "14" sticker on the number plate. Still roadworthy! (Or someone's paying to keep it registered for no good reason.)

--Dave
 
Argenticien said:
Indeed I like the look from that 80. It has handled a very busy foliage background pretty well in that Hilux shot. But I'm not sure I would find it so much better than the usual Nikkor 75 that I'd be willing to spend $200(?) for one.

I notice the Toyota has a "14" sticker on the number plate. Still roadworthy! (Or someone's paying to keep it registered for no good reason.)

--Dave
Click to expand...

Dave,
I've not used the 80/2.4 enough to decide if I think it's "better" than the Nikkor-P 75/2.8
The Nikkor is currently my favorite lens and so I'm probably biased towards it.

I think that the owner of the Hilux is probably still using it, most likely just now and then to haul yard work type stuff.
 
Wowwww Colton, it's so great. Yes indeed the bokeh is what I like from the 80 but Nikkor P is not bad.
Argenticien said:
Indeed I like the look from that 80. It has handled a very busy foliage background pretty well in that Hilux shot. But I'm not sure I would find it so much better than the usual Nikkor 75 that I'd be willing to spend $200(?) for one.

I notice the Toyota has a "14" sticker on the number plate. Still roadworthy! (Or someone's paying to keep it registered for no good reason.)

--Dave
Click to expand...

It depends on people, but if you dont want to spend much, get it along with one camera, then sell the camera if you dont want.
 
kyonthinh said:
Wowwww Colton, it's so great. Yes indeed the bokeh is what I like from the 80 but Nikkor P is not bad.
Click to expand...
The 80 seems like a great lens, but the 75 Nikkor is superb as well.

Shab said:
Colton, the bokeh is great in the 80mm.

And, Which are your feelings with the EC?
Click to expand...

So far, I'm really liking the EC. Focusing is easier and much more accurate than my S2. It seems to be better balanced than the S2 as well.
Sadly, my EC seems to have a shutter capping issue. Two frames were cut off slightly. I'm gonna shoot another roll for now and see how it goes.


FWIW, the Nikkor-P has pretty awesome bokeh too.

11-24-13+Bronica+Ektar-001Nweb.jpg

Zenza Bronica S2
Nikkor-P 75/2.8
Kodak Ektar 100​
 
kyonthinh said:
It depends on people, but if you dont want to spend much, get it along with one camera, then sell the camera if you dont want.
Click to expand...

I thought of that too (as the lens often works out cheaper as part of a package), but I have no confidence in my ability to let go of a camera once I buy it:D, especially if it were an EC, since I don't have one yet.

Swift1 said:
So far, I'm really liking the EC. Focusing is easier and much more accurate than my S2. It seems to be better balanced than the S2 as well.
Click to expand...

And this doesn't make it any easier!

--Dave
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom