Post your foveon DP & SD1m Images

DP3, same subject

33o6rye.jpg


k21ow8.jpg
 
Wow, Samouraï, looks like you got some pretty serious vertical banding in that second image 😛

I like it and would crop a bit to show only the branches with their new foliage, perhaps increasing the contrast just a smidge.
 
noimmunity said:
Louis, the relatively dark ceiling area in that image you posted, which I like very much, leads me to pose a question. Under similar conditions (when there is a difference of at least 3 stops in the scene), I find the DP Merrills sometimes produce strange color casts. Have you noticed this, and if yes, what is your work-around? Thanks, Jon.
Click to expand...

Jon

You are indeed correct. In this photograph, the roof beams did exhibit some green colour cast in the original file (RAW). I used layers in photoshop to isolate that area and then desaturate to taste. It is an unfortunate aspect of an otherwise spectacular sensor.

The reason I am willing to live with such issues is that to date I have not owned a digital camera which can cope with such a wide dynamic range. In most cases, either the window highlights would have been blown or the shadow areas a mass of dark noise. With the DP2M the ability to simultaneously recover highlights and shadow areas is in my experience unique.

Your 'Alpenglow' picture is wonderful - the light on the buildings and the subtelty of the sky tones is excellent.

LouisB
 
Thanks, Louis, you've saved my sanity...and pointed me towards something I've always tried to avoid: working with layers.

With skyscapes, desaturation is less effective. I did try some selective desaturation through control points ("layer-lite" for the photoshop-impaired), but that created other problems.

I'm just starting to become aware of the problem, so it will certainly take some trial and error to devise work arounds.


louisb said:
Jon

You are indeed correct. In this photograph, the roof beams did exhibit some green colour cast in the original file (RAW). I used layers in photoshop to isolate that area and then desaturate to taste. It is an unfortunate aspect of an otherwise spectacular sensor.

The reason I am willing to live with such issues is that to date I have not owned a digital camera which can cope with such a wide dynamic range. In most cases, either the window highlights would have been blown or the shadow areas a mass of dark noise. With the DP2M the ability to simultaneously recover highlights and shadow areas is in my experience unique.

Your 'Alpenglow' picture is wonderful - the light on the buildings and the subtelty of the sky tones is excellent.

LouisB
Click to expand...
 
noimmunity said:
Thanks, Louis, you've saved my sanity...and pointed me towards something I've always tried to avoid: working with layers.

With skyscapes, desaturation is less effective. I did try some selective desaturation through control points ("layer-lite" for the photoshop-impaired), but that created other problems.

I'm just starting to become aware of the problem, so it will certainly take some trial and error to devise work arounds.
Click to expand...

Jon

I felt the same way - the solution was pointed out to me by a talented photographer friend.

"Scott Kelby's 7 Point System for Adobe Photoshop". I guarantee if you spend a couple of hours reading only first chapter of his excellent book you will become a pro with layers.

Louis
 
louisb said:
Jon

I felt the same way - the solution was pointed out to me by a talented photographer friend.

"Scott Kelby's 7 Point System for Adobe Photoshop". I guarantee if you spend a couple of hours reading only first chapter of his excellent book you will become a pro with layers.

Louis
Click to expand...

Thanks for the tip, Louis.
Hava good one !
Jon
 
Nice shots everyone keep them coming.
- Nlubis, the first b&w I like the best
- Louisb, thanks for the hints on the use of layers, now I know how you got such a nice range in that shot
- Samourai like the second better
- Jscooter - nice interesting shot... Your daughter?
- Keith, now we are talking. I like it.
- Jon, the Pano stitch looks great..I can c the glow.
- bk1970, I think your influence is showing in terms of abstract shots. I like the second pic.

Gary
 
Keith said:
😱 ... a cat shot!

Foveon cat though. 😀

SDIM0047a_zps4fa1383a.jpg
Click to expand...

Is it me or is there something special about the way the foveon
renders hair?
It's special and I really like the look. I noticed it in
the early photos in this thread and noticed in the girls portrait above this post. The RX, XE, OMD, X100 etc. never appealed to me but I might have to try this camera. Not just for hair but the unique overall look. Great pictures from all the contributors.
 
Last edited:
palmerfralick said:
Is it me or is there something special about the way the forveon renders hair?
It's special and I really like the look. I noticed on the early photos in this thread and noticed in the girls portrait above this post. The RX, XE, OMD, X100 etc. never appealed to me but I might have to try this camera. Not just for hair but the unique overall look. Great pictures from all the contributors.
Click to expand...


My thoughts exactly about the hair thing and it's what made me take a second look at the DPM series.

Incredible resolution without that overly detailed digital look ... it must be unique to the sensor I agree. 🙂
 
Keith said:
😱 ... a cat shot!

Foveon cat though. 😀

SDIM0047a_zps4fa1383a.jpg
Click to expand...

Is it me or is there something special about the way the forveon renders hair?
It's special and I really like the look. I noticed on the early photos in this thread and noticed in the girls portrait above this post. The RX, XE, OMD, X100 etc. never appealed to me but I might have to try this camera. Not just for hair but the unique overall look. Great pictures from all the contributors.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom