Robert Lai
Well-known
There was a thread not long ago (which I can't seem to find now), in which someone asked if the 1.35V battery adapter made in Thailand by Pratedthai was any good.
Someone else claimed that the Thai adapter was a fraud because he measured the voltage with a battery inserted in the adapter, and the voltage was 1.5V.
To verify whether the accusation is justified, I tested the following:
CRIS MR9 adapter
Pratedthai adapter (abbreviated PThai)
Wein Cell
Alkaline 625 cell
in the following meters:
Leica MR-4, Canon 7s, Canon FX
All of the cameras and meters have been recently overhauled, and read accurately.
I used a GB GDT-11 multimeter in the 2V measuring range to obtain the voltages put out by the various combinations.
Here are open circuit (essentially no load) voltages using new Everready 386 1.5V silver oxide batteries in the adapters. The Wein cell is a couple of months old in use.
CRIS - 1.52V
PThai - 1.52V
Wein - 1.345V
Alkaline - 1.94V
So, here you see that the CRIS adapter and the Pratedthai adapter behave the same way. With no load (or microampere currents), they don't reduce the voltage at all. However, a light meter will put a drain on the battery in the milliampere range. With that much current flow, they WILL reduce the voltage to the stated 1.35V.
Here are the results:
Wein Cell = CRIS = Pratedthai in all meters.
The battery check functions all indicated good batteries.
The meter needles read identically regardless of the cell or adapter used.
The odd one out was the Alkaline cell.
Although the no-load reading was very high at 1.94V, when placed in the meters, the cell failed in all of the meters.
Battery check indicated exhausted battery.
The meter needle barely moved, and indicate the wrong exposure (off by many stops).
My conclusion:
Wein Cell = CRIS adapter = Pratedthai adapter.
The Pratedthai adapters are not a fraud. They work, and work great. I no longer need to purchase Wein cells with their corrosion risk as a result.
Someone else claimed that the Thai adapter was a fraud because he measured the voltage with a battery inserted in the adapter, and the voltage was 1.5V.
To verify whether the accusation is justified, I tested the following:
CRIS MR9 adapter
Pratedthai adapter (abbreviated PThai)
Wein Cell
Alkaline 625 cell
in the following meters:
Leica MR-4, Canon 7s, Canon FX
All of the cameras and meters have been recently overhauled, and read accurately.
I used a GB GDT-11 multimeter in the 2V measuring range to obtain the voltages put out by the various combinations.
Here are open circuit (essentially no load) voltages using new Everready 386 1.5V silver oxide batteries in the adapters. The Wein cell is a couple of months old in use.
CRIS - 1.52V
PThai - 1.52V
Wein - 1.345V
Alkaline - 1.94V
So, here you see that the CRIS adapter and the Pratedthai adapter behave the same way. With no load (or microampere currents), they don't reduce the voltage at all. However, a light meter will put a drain on the battery in the milliampere range. With that much current flow, they WILL reduce the voltage to the stated 1.35V.
Here are the results:
Wein Cell = CRIS = Pratedthai in all meters.
The battery check functions all indicated good batteries.
The meter needles read identically regardless of the cell or adapter used.
The odd one out was the Alkaline cell.
Although the no-load reading was very high at 1.94V, when placed in the meters, the cell failed in all of the meters.
Battery check indicated exhausted battery.
The meter needle barely moved, and indicate the wrong exposure (off by many stops).
My conclusion:
Wein Cell = CRIS adapter = Pratedthai adapter.
The Pratedthai adapters are not a fraud. They work, and work great. I no longer need to purchase Wein cells with their corrosion risk as a result.
Last edited: