google turned up another recent story on rosie holtom, whose approach is different:
http://www.theguardian.com/artanddes...omeless-people
http://www.flickr.com/photos/68473745@N08/
makes for an interesting compare and contrast. what are your thoughts on how they approach their subjects as either "just another person like me" vs. "these people live in a very different world than me"?
I know just a little about homeless people, having worked with a charity that seeks to help them a long time ago. Here's the thing, they are not just the "pretty faces" of Holtom's work or the glossed over colour of Arnade's.
They are young, sometimes very young and middle aged and old. Most of them stink, because it's very difficult to keep clean if you sleep in a doorway several nights a week. A lot have mental problems, sometimes because they were ill and thus became homeless and some because the trauma of being homeless has made them ill. They also have plenty of physical illness, if only because they seldom get enough to eat.
Many of them are impossible to help because we simply won't put the facilities in place for the very great effort that would be required to do so. A small number
really don't want help because they've chosen this for themselves. All we can ever do for the latter group is give them a good meal, when they want it, and accept their decission.
Now, if things had gone just a little different for me, I might well have been one of those needing help, rather than one of the lucky people trying to help them.
So, I personally, do not think these pictures achieve anything for the homeless, the druggies, the prostitutes or any of the other "street people". Instead, I find myself suspicious of the motives of the photographers.
I'm sorry if this goes against anyone else's deep held beliefs about the power of the image or the redeemability of mankind but I feel that the realities are way beyond the ability of any set of pictures to make the slightest difference to the lives of these people and I think it to be the worst kind of arrogance to pretend that it could.