kshapero
South Florida Man
Do you miss not using a fast lens?i'm pretty much settled on a 28/50, 2 lens kit and the 40 as a one lens walk around combo.
back alley
IMAGES
Do you miss not using a fast lens?
i miss the big fifty...and hope to get another when my finances permit.
coqueiro
Member
Slightly off topic question though.
I'm really relatively new to shooting with rangefinders and currently I have only the Ultron 28/2. I'm leaning towards a wider focal length like the Super-Wide Heliar 15/4.5. The only thing stopping me is the speed of the Ultron. But then again, most of the time, I find myself shooting at F4 and above.
Will I really miss out on the F2 if I trade the Ultron for a Heliar?
I'm really relatively new to shooting with rangefinders and currently I have only the Ultron 28/2. I'm leaning towards a wider focal length like the Super-Wide Heliar 15/4.5. The only thing stopping me is the speed of the Ultron. But then again, most of the time, I find myself shooting at F4 and above.
Will I really miss out on the F2 if I trade the Ultron for a Heliar?
back alley
IMAGES
if i were to have only one lens for my rd1 and given the choice you offer, i would stick with the 28. it's a better 'all round' lens...even though i love the 15 on the rd1.
coqueiro
Member
if i were to have only one lens for my rd1 and given the choice you offer, i would stick with the 28. it's a better 'all round' lens...even though i love the 15 on the rd1.
Yeah? Thanks for the input. I'll hold off buying the Heliar then.
Cheers.
The Meaness
Well-known
The cv 15 is great. The only piece of gear I own that I haven't thought seriously about selling - including the R-D1. That said what makes it great is that it has a very dramatic perspective, and like Joe said, most people can't use that for 100% of what they shoot. 15/28 should be a great setup for you, just wait. Or you could find a cheap LTM version. Sometimes they go for around $200 without a finder.
back alley
IMAGES
back to thinking about this whole 2 lens kit...except that i am now thinking it needs to remain a 3 lens kit but with a switch of one lens.
i'm thinking that instead of a 50 i need to get another 15. i miss that wide angle and the abilty to point and shoot in a crowded area or on the street.
so, a kit with 2 bodies, and 3 lenses, a 28, the 40 and a 15.
translates to a 24/42/60 set up on full frame.
i'm thinking that instead of a 50 i need to get another 15. i miss that wide angle and the abilty to point and shoot in a crowded area or on the street.
so, a kit with 2 bodies, and 3 lenses, a 28, the 40 and a 15.
translates to a 24/42/60 set up on full frame.
usayit
Well-known
For a long time, my RD1 was outfitted with a Tri-Elmar 28-35-50. If the light is good, it works well on the RD1. I sold the tri-elmar to fund other things....
Lately, the CV 21mm and 50mm Summarit seem to spend good amount of time on the RD1.
Lately, the CV 21mm and 50mm Summarit seem to spend good amount of time on the RD1.
shadeofpale
Established
Wouldn't like to miss the Zeiss Planar, Joe.
It is my portrait lens- with the cam a very
calm and unobtrusive combination.
It is my portrait lens- with the cam a very
calm and unobtrusive combination.
noimmunity
scratch my niche
back to thinking about this whole 2 lens kit...except that i am now thinking it needs to remain a 3 lens kit but with a switch of one lens.
i'm thinking that instead of a 50 i need to get another 15. i miss that wide angle and the abilty to point and shoot in a crowded area or on the street.
so, a kit with 2 bodies, and 3 lenses, a 28, the 40 and a 15.
translates to a 24/42/60 set up on full frame.
I'd miss having a fast lens...
But that 28 and that 40 are made to go together...
So it's a tough decision...:bang:
Unless the parameters open up to a fourth lens :angel:
back alley
IMAGES
I'd miss having a fast lens...
But that 28 and that 40 are made to go together...
So it's a tough decision...:bang:
Unless the parameters open up to a fourth lens :angel:
down the road, i still hope to get another 50/1.1.
but at the moment that seems way off.
plus, i am determined to master that 40 sonnar...i think it has so much potential on the rd1.
noimmunity
scratch my niche
down the road, i still hope to get another 50/1.1.
but at the moment that seems way off.
plus, i am determined to master that 40 sonnar...i think it has so much potential on the rd1.
Yes, I think the 40 is a superb lens, and it's one of my most frequently used lenses. And because it shares the same barrel as the CV 28/3.5, I am always very tempted to get one of those again for a really sweet super light/compact daytime rig.
back alley
IMAGES
Yes, I think the 40 is a superb lens, and it's one of my most frequently used lenses. And because it shares the same barrel as the CV 28/3.5, I am always very tempted to get one of those again for a really sweet super light/compact daytime rig.
add the 50/2.5 and you have 3 look-a-like lenses.
noimmunity
scratch my niche
add the 50/2.5 and you have 3 look-a-like lenses.
Forgot about the 50 being like that, but with a 40 in the stable, it wouldn't appeal to me. (Curious why you'd keep your limited funds tied up in the 50?). Now if there were a slowish smallish 75 with the same filter size, that'd be magic!
back alley
IMAGES
Forgot about the 50 being like that, but with a 40 in the stable, it wouldn't appeal to me. (Curious why you'd keep your limited funds tied up in the 50?). Now if there were a slowish smallish 75 with the same filter size, that'd be magic!
been thinking the same thing.
a 50 translates to a 75 on rd1 and i like the fov...a 75 becomes a 114 or so.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.