tbarker13
shooter of stuff
If you don't need a meter, get an M2.
But as several folks have said, you can't really go wrong with any of the Ms.
But as several folks have said, you can't really go wrong with any of the Ms.
Bingley
Veteran
+1 on an M2 w/ CV 35/2.5 and Canon 50/1.8 (and some other lenses too 
). I don't have anything to add to the comments above on this combination and the excellence of those lenses.
I got my M2 from KEH, "bargain" grade, for $525, about three years ago. I was surprised at how good the condition was when it arrived. It didn't need a CLA, although I did have it CLA'd last year when I had the covering replaced. It's a joy to use.
). I don't have anything to add to the comments above on this combination and the excellence of those lenses. I got my M2 from KEH, "bargain" grade, for $525, about three years ago. I was surprised at how good the condition was when it arrived. It didn't need a CLA, although I did have it CLA'd last year when I had the covering replaced. It's a joy to use.
maddoc
... likes film again.
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
... Well, not exactly a correct guess.
Gabor, that's a gracious response.
I was smiling when I saw that guess put out to you.
It never ceased to amaze me that some still hold on to the myth of the "ultimate" classic M body.
And assume anyone who prefer the more "pedestrian" M4-P as inexperienced.