enochRoot
a chymist of some repute
i just saw a richard avedon exhibit at the local museum last week. it was the "in the american west" series. i'm sure most of you have seen the photos, but have you seen the actual prints?! absolutely amazing. larger than life size prints that are so captivating at any distance. and a LOT of them (78 i believe). it was quite moving. i loved walking around the space. i could stand back in the middle of the room, and take in all these huge faces looking back at me at once. or i could stand closer...and look intently at one print. but further...i could walk right up to it, and view the detail from 10 inches away. they were just stunning. you could not even see the seams where the paper was glued together to reach the needed width unless you were right upon it. whoever printed these was a master artisan in his own right. and naturally the photos themselves are amazing.
i was surprised that he "only" used an 8x10. the detail on these enlargements was ridiculous! all my wife and i could think was "you cannot do this with digital". this isn't meant to be a filim vs. digital thing at all. i'm just saying:
a: if this exhibit comes to your town...make sure you see it
b: i honestly think film (at least as a fine art medium) will stick around for a long while (for purposes such as this)
his view of this is pretty interesting too. i don't read tons of photographic critique or theory or anything. i prefer learing from the images, and discussing them with friends. but avedon's take on this is pretty interesting:
forward to "in the american west"
i was surprised that he "only" used an 8x10. the detail on these enlargements was ridiculous! all my wife and i could think was "you cannot do this with digital". this isn't meant to be a filim vs. digital thing at all. i'm just saying:
a: if this exhibit comes to your town...make sure you see it
b: i honestly think film (at least as a fine art medium) will stick around for a long while (for purposes such as this)
his view of this is pretty interesting too. i don't read tons of photographic critique or theory or anything. i prefer learing from the images, and discussing them with friends. but avedon's take on this is pretty interesting:
forward to "in the american west"