dleyva2
Established
lamap
Luis Albergaria Pacheco
raphaelaaron
Well-known
kdemas
Enjoy Life.
From my first outing with the new GR.
Descending Darkness.
Descending Darkness.
raphaelaaron
Well-known
awesome. wow. blown away.
kdemas
Enjoy Life.
Thanks, glad you like it!
2tigers
Established
kdemas...thanks for making me lust for the new GR 
kdemas
Enjoy Life.
GRD IV.
Less than.
Less than.
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
Yummy Good Kent...
Reminds me of something I would Shoot...poor fellow in hard Times
Though possibly its a tad overprocessed for my Taste...but such Great 'Feel'
The ricoh looks like a Winner to work with...
Reminds me of something I would Shoot...poor fellow in hard Times
Though possibly its a tad overprocessed for my Taste...but such Great 'Feel'
The ricoh looks like a Winner to work with...
rhl-oregon
Cameras Guitars Wonders
Kent, how are you finding the diff between the IV & V (presuming that's the "new GR" you mention)?
I'm in no rush for f2.8 after all this time with f1.9, despite the larger sensor. The first project I did with the III in 2011 was indoors, low light, and I shot a lot wide open @1600, and those results were what made me a GRD believer. The IV handles 1.9/1600 even better, with 3200 as needed.
Would love to hear your thoughts / see some side-by-sides, while I wait on my rebuilt IV to come home....
I'm in no rush for f2.8 after all this time with f1.9, despite the larger sensor. The first project I did with the III in 2011 was indoors, low light, and I shot a lot wide open @1600, and those results were what made me a GRD believer. The IV handles 1.9/1600 even better, with 3200 as needed.
Would love to hear your thoughts / see some side-by-sides, while I wait on my rebuilt IV to come home....
kdemas
Enjoy Life.
Robert,
I like them both a great deal. The new GR (APS-C) gives a little more file to work with with the ability to push it more in post. That said I think both are superb and frankly the dual focusing and shake reduction on the IV make it a staunch competitor, regardless of sensor size. 3200 on the V is absolutely no problem with higher ISOs usable on the BW side for sure.
I'll take and pop up some comparisons this week, happy to. I can say that I still like the IV form factor more but the 5 was a pleasure to shoot with.
KD
I like them both a great deal. The new GR (APS-C) gives a little more file to work with with the ability to push it more in post. That said I think both are superb and frankly the dual focusing and shake reduction on the IV make it a staunch competitor, regardless of sensor size. 3200 on the V is absolutely no problem with higher ISOs usable on the BW side for sure.
I'll take and pop up some comparisons this week, happy to. I can say that I still like the IV form factor more but the 5 was a pleasure to shoot with.
KD
kdemas
Enjoy Life.
Yummy Good Kent...
Reminds me of something I would Shoot...poor fellow in hard Times
Though possibly its a tad overprocessed for my Taste...but such Great 'Feel'
The ricoh looks like a Winner to work with...
@Helen - It is pretty "cooked" from a processing point of view, definitely not for everyone's sensibilities. I was definitely trying to maximize the "feel, not necessarily the overall IQ.
Here's a more conventional one from the IV.
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
Oh no Kent, I do Love the Shot.... I'm just not as daring with post processing
'cooked' is Fine, lol...really the shot Works Supreme
Best to You - H
