K
Kyle
Guest
Nachkebia said:Yes it was an exaggeration Kyle 🙂
OK, thanks for clearing that up. I do feel a bit stupid... not the first time thats ever happened, though.
Nachkebia said:Yes it was an exaggeration Kyle 🙂
ray_g said:Has anyone any experience with the Fuji F30?
malland said:Someone early in this thread stated that the pcitures from the GR-D are "plascticky": no way -- one can't believe everything one reads on the web -- as others have stated, the noise at higher speeds looks remarkably like film grain.
shutterflower said:15 seconds is the write time for Raw files, from what I read.
I'll wait for the GR-D II. Till then ,the SD700is will be a welcome tool.
ChrisN said:Hi Mitch - welcome to the forum. I think the earlier reference to "plasticky" was to the appearance of the camera, not to the appearance of the pics made by the camera.
There's some very nice pics from it in this thread. "Black & White Photography" magazine (the english one) had some nice things to say about it in their April 06 issue, but also commented on the RAW write times as ridiculously slow.
sirius said:
Given my experience with my own GR1, I'm not at all surprised – they packed a lot of performance in that little camera, which is still my all-time favorite compact.malland said:BTW, Ricoh technical support told me that one could not expect a print larger than A4 from an 8M camera. But, then, people on the Leica Forum will tell you that 35mm pnegatives cannot be printed larger than 8x10 or 11x14 inches. Moriyama Daido, however, now prints his Tri-X and Neopan 1600 negatives from the GR1 at 100x150cm on the Epson 9800--and the prints look great. Anyone who is in Sydney should make sure to see the room at the Sydney Biennale where he is exhibiting 59 pictures this size (Gallery of NSW).
--Mitch/Bangkok
sirius said:Sorry Ray, my posting wasn't a terse response to your question. I thought that link would be helpful for anyone evaluating the camera. There are a number of sample images on the site.