Rodinal clone and current HC-110 shelf-life?

Correct, Sino produced the new version which is water-based not glycol based. The old version is not produced by anyone anymore.

Marty
I have some bottles of HC110 made by SINO and TETENAL
Just looked through to confirm and found out that SINO version is EXACTLY THE SAME as the TETENAL one, which is glycol base.
I snap the ingrdients for proof,
check it out. The first photo is snap of TETENAL bottle to compare. 1712758618427.png

1712758495744.png

1712758558185.png
 
I have some bottles of HC110 made by SINO and TETENAL
Just looked through to confirm and found out that SINO version is EXACTLY THE SAME as the TETENAL one, which is glycol base.
I snap the ingrdients for proof,
check it out. The first photo is snap of TETENAL bottle to compare. View attachment 4835985

View attachment 4835983

View attachment 4835984
This is a list of contents, not a formula. They are not the same. The proportions of the organic alkalis are different and the principal solvent in the Sino version is water which contains sulfite, not glycol containing liquid sulfite as an organic complex. Measure the viscosity, or the sodium content. The proportions of catechol (1,2 benzene diol) and hydroquinone (1,4 benzene diol) also differ.

The MDS for each product demonstrates much of this:

Detailed and discussed here:

The results are the same but the formulas are different.

Analysed here:

Marty
 
Last edited:
This is a list of contents, not a formula. They are not the same. The proportions of the organic alkalis are different and the principal solvent in the Sino version is water which contains sulfite, not glycol containing liquid sulfite as an organic complex. Measure the viscosity, or the sodium content. The proportions of catechol (1,2 benzene diol) and hydroquinone (1,4 benzene diol) also differ.

The MDS for each product demonstrates much of this:

Detailed and discussed here:

The results are the same but the formulas are different.

Analysed here:

Marty

I totally got your point here that the OLD and NEW formulars are different.
But the key point here is: we are not sure whether SINO was making the OLD for NEW formula.
Looking at the viscosity I found the SINO one and TETENAL one are no different and it's quite thick.
That's why i SUSPECTED that it's the old version.
A guy here also share the same thought with me.
 
I totally got your point here that the OLD and NEW formulars are different.
But the key point here is: we are not sure whether SINO was making the OLD for NEW formula.
Looking at the viscosity I found the SINO one and TETENAL one are no different and it's quite thick.
That's why i SUSPECTED that it's the old version.
A guy here also share the same thought with me.
The Sino Promise bottle I had was definitely the new formulation with much lesser viscosity. Sino might have packaged or labelled the end of the Tetenal manufacturing run, but I doubt they had the technology to manufacture the old formula. If you really want to know, check the water content of the developer you have using copper (II) sulfate or cobalt chloride.

Marty
 
Some further research uncovered some interesting evidence:

IMG_5894.jpeg

This is a “Made in Germany for SinoPromise” bottle of HC-110. It is the old formula (and I see it being sold as such in several places). It is possible that there are other variants, but the product I looked at in the round SinoPromise bottle with Made in China on it was the new formula, and I really doubt that SinoPromise made any of the old formula, but who knows how what was packed and labelled?

As I said, test for water, or measure the viscosity against a known standard.
 
Some further research uncovered some interesting evidence:

View attachment 4836051

This is a “Made in Germany for SinoPromise” bottle of HC-110. It is the old formula (and I see it being sold as such in several places). It is possible that there are other variants, but the product I looked at in the round SinoPromise bottle with Made in China on it was the new formula, and I really doubt that SinoPromise made any of the old formula, but who knows how what was packed and labelled?

As I said, test for water, or measure the viscosity against a known standard.
My German made HC-110 for SINO is also the last batch of the old formular in old shape bottle that I have (EXP 2023),
Current SINO made in China has expire date of 2025. Still no way to test for water as I dont have any special tool for that.
Just pure my judgement from looking of the color and the viscosity.
 
I am currently using Ilfotec HC (1 litre bottle decanted into 100ml medicine bottles) and it is 3 years old with no sign of deterioration. I use Calpol childrens paracetamol bottles and they come with an oral medicine syringe and fitted stopper.


Untitled_254019GB by E.J. Bragg, on Flickr
how long does your stock mixture last though? you know, the "mix x amount of concentrate with y amount of water. then use the below chart to make the working solution"
 
how long does your stock mixture last though? you know, the "mix x amount of concentrate with y amount of water. then use the below chart to make the working solution"
Most users these days omit making a stock solution and measure syrupy developers using a syringe and dilute directly from syrup. That way the longevity of the stock doesn’t matter.
 
Last edited:
Most users these days omit making a stock solution and measure syrupy developers using a syringe and dilute directly from syrup. That way the longevity of the stock doesn’t matter.
what, and not follow the ilford directions... thats heresy i say, heresy. Ill bring the torches. someone else needs to bring the pitchforks
 
You are following Ilford’s directions, just skipping the less stable stock solution.
all of ilford directions for making that final working solution come FROM diluting the stock solution. I know its popular for HC-110 users to do straight from syrup but mathematically it only works for specific dilutions.

I can get over developed negs on xp2 super using 50ml of stock to my paterson tank... id hate to see what comes from using 50ml of straight up syrup in a paterson tank.
 
I have checked the old type Kodak HC-110 and the HC-110 made in Germany for Sino, both in the same type bottles but there is a difference in viscocity. In general the same chemicals are used but somehow they are different. BTW Tetenal was already (again) in bankruptcy last year.
 
Currently on Taobao, there is HC-110 Clone which is "KOIMAGE HC-110" Has anyone tried this one? The bottle shape is similar to the SINO rounded one.
 
About the Rodinal/R09. The old Agfa-Photo Rodinal you could keep for a very long time. After 15 years you could see some difference with a standard APX 100 film measured out with a densitometer, so most people would not see any difference. It was sold in a Silar bottle. The old Calbe OrWo R09 from the DDR you could also keep long but after 4 years it reaches a critical point. Foma is using this receipt and Compard too. I know that Fotoimpex has used it too but in thin bottles so it had a shorter life span. No idea what they are using now for packing under Adox brand.
 
I was getting thin negs from an old bottle of R09. Nothing that couldn't be "fixed" by adjusting development times or post process on the computer. What a difference though when using a fresh bottle. The old R09 was probably opened 2 years ago, purchased probably 3 years ago. I tend to buy two bottles at a time. Maybe a bit older; I always use Rodinal as a back up to my more time sensitive developers. In the normal course of events it would probably have been used up a year ago, but life events had me take a break from photography. Now I wonder about the bottle of old formula HC-110 sitting on the shelf. It's got to be 5 years old. Probably has lost some effectiveness. Maybe just toss it.
 
I was getting thin negs from an old bottle of R09. Nothing that couldn't be "fixed" by adjusting development times or post process on the computer. What a difference though when using a fresh bottle. The old R09 was probably opened 2 years ago, purchased probably 3 years ago. I tend to buy two bottles at a time. Maybe a bit older; I always use Rodinal as a back up to my more time sensitive developers. In the normal course of events it would probably have been used up a year ago, but life events had me take a break from photography. Now I wonder about the bottle of old formula HC-110 sitting on the shelf. It's got to be 5 years old. Probably has lost some effectiveness. Maybe just toss it.
The HC-110 will work. Give it away if you don’t want it, maybe, that way it’s not wasted.
 
The HC-110 will work. Give it away if you don’t want it, maybe, that way it’s not wasted.
Ok, thanks. My opened bottle of HC-110 is maybe more than 5 years old. It's when they changed the formula. I got a bottle of the old formula then, but don't use it much. My fave developer (Clayton F76) has a pretty short shelf life. That's why I keep Rodinal and HC-110 around. If the Hc-100 is still good, I'll just use it up.
 
Ok, thanks. My opened bottle of HC-110 is maybe more than 5 years old. It's when they changed the formula. I got a bottle of the old formula then, but don't use it much. My fave developer (Clayton F76) has a pretty short shelf life. That's why I keep Rodinal and HC-110 around. If the Hc-100 is still good, I'll just use it up.
I am still using a bottle of HC-110 from 1987. It looks like raspberry jelly/jell-o. It has lost maybe 5-10% activity compared to new. The old formula lasts a _long_ time.

Marty
 
Back
Top Bottom